Iran Disregards Ongoing Protests, Expects Riot to Subside

A police motorcycle burns during a protest in Tehran (Reuters)
A police motorcycle burns during a protest in Tehran (Reuters)
TT

Iran Disregards Ongoing Protests, Expects Riot to Subside

A police motorcycle burns during a protest in Tehran (Reuters)
A police motorcycle burns during a protest in Tehran (Reuters)

On the 56th day of the Iranian riots, a senior security official expected the protests "to subside," while the Iranian judiciary threatened to establish courts to "firmly handle" those who cause "turmoil" or "commit crimes" during the anti-government protests sweeping the country.

The protests constitute one of the biggest challenges facing the country's rulers since the Islamic Revolution in 1979. Demonstrations against the regime have continued for eight weeks despite strict security measures and severe warnings issued by the security forces.

According to social media, the authorities escalated strict security measures in Tehran and deployed a group of policemen on horses to quell the protests.

The Iranian authorities used police cavalry to control the protests that erupted following the death of Mahsa Amini while the morality police were holding her.

Women led the protest movement, removing and burning their headscarves while chanting anti-regime slogans and confronting security forces in the streets despite the crackdown that killed dozens.

- Government denial

About two months after the protests, numerous videos on social media showed security forces using live ammunition, tear gas, and even paintballs.

The government imposed Internet restrictions, including blocking access to Instagram and WhatsApp, and waged a campaign of mass arrests.

Government spokesman Ali Bahadori Jahromi said, "it would have been a piece of cake for police forces to use live rounds on the protesters," and people would be afraid to leave their homes.

Jahromi argued that the government will not resort to such actions because youths on the streets are not enemies but "our wrongdoer children."

The state-run Mehr news agency quoted the Head of Passive Defense, Brigadier General Gholamreza Jalali, saying that the "sedition and riots" are subsiding, noting that the violence has overpassed terrorism.

Sit-ins were renewed in several universities in Tehran.

The Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) published the students' chant "Death to the regime" and "there will be deaths among the IRGC ranks."

Meanwhile, the former professor at Tehran University, Zahra Rahnavard, wife of reformist leader Mir Hossein Mousavi, called for ending the crackdown on protesters, including students.

Rahnavard, who has been under house arrest with Mousavi since February 2011, called for releasing all detained students and stopping threatening, depriving, and expelling students.

Vice-president for parliamentary affairs Mohammed Hosseini was interrupted by angry students during a speech at Tarbiat Modares University in central Tehran. Hosseini was trying to restore calm and contain the situation at the universities.

The state-run ISNA news agency said the students chanted "Women, Life, Freedom" and "Release the detained students."

Hosseini addressed the students and asserted that he was there to listen to them, noting that a university is a place for dialogue, and there is no need to chant slogans if things are discussed within reason.

The lawmaker commented on requests to hold a referendum on the policies, precisely the form of the regime, similar to the referendum that took place after the 1979 revolution. He said that the Iranian regime is the only one elected based on a referendum. However, the system's origin cannot be put to a referendum.

- Overthrow and disintegration

Presidential advisor on legal affairs Mohammad Dehghan said the recent developments in Iran were "beyond protest" and that the enemy seeks to use the unrest to disintegrate Iran.

Dehghan warned that the enemy, using everything in its power, especially the media, is seeking to disintegrate Iran through regime change.

The call for a new referendum was first made by Iran's leading Sunni cleric Molavi Abdulhamid, based in the south-eastern city of Zahedan.

Abdulhamid condemned the Iranian state for making accusations of "separatism" against the protesters, asserting: "we are all Iranians, and we feel brotherhood."

He blamed the officials' performance saying that 43 after the revolution, women, sects, and minorities faced discrimination and inequality.

Iranian officials accuse the United States of inflaming tensions, and hardliner lawmakers urged the judiciary to "deal decisively" with the perpetrators.

HRANA reported that nearly 15,000 had been arrested, pointing out that 429 university students had been charged.

The organization said late Monday that the death toll had reached 321 people, including 50 children, in 136 cities and 135 universities that witnessed protests.

The organization indicated that 38 members of the police forces, Basij forces, and security services had been killed in the campaign.

The judiciary vows

Judiciary spokesman Masoud Setayeshi said the court is about to issue a verdict against the two journalists, Niloofar Hamedi and Elaheh Mohammadi, who are detained in Evin prison.

During his weekly press conference, Setayeshi said that Hamedi and Mohammadi are under pre-trial detention for propaganda against the regime and conspiracy against national security.

Last week, Iranian intelligence accused the two journalists of being "foreign agents" and considered their status as journalists nothing but a "cover."

Hamedi worked for the pro-reform Sharq daily and was the first to signal to the world that all was not well with Amini with a photo of her parents hugging each other in a Tehran hospital.

Mohammadi covered Amini's funeral in Saqez, where the protests began.

Setayeshi asserted that Iran's courts would deal firmly with anyone who causes disruption or commits crimes during a wave of anti-government protests.

More than 1,000 people have been indicted in Tehran Province alone in connection with what the government calls "riots."

"Now, the public, even protesters who are not supportive of riots, demand from the judiciary and security institutions to deal with the few people who have caused disturbances in a firm, deterrent, and legal manner," Setayeshi said.



Harris, Trump Offer Starkly Different Visions on Climate Change and Energy

Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a debate, Oct. 7, 2020, in Salt Lake City, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks during a debate, June 27, 2024, in Atlanta. (AP Photo)
Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a debate, Oct. 7, 2020, in Salt Lake City, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks during a debate, June 27, 2024, in Atlanta. (AP Photo)
TT

Harris, Trump Offer Starkly Different Visions on Climate Change and Energy

Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a debate, Oct. 7, 2020, in Salt Lake City, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks during a debate, June 27, 2024, in Atlanta. (AP Photo)
Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a debate, Oct. 7, 2020, in Salt Lake City, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks during a debate, June 27, 2024, in Atlanta. (AP Photo)

As the Earth sizzled through a summer with four of the hottest days ever measured, Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump have starkly different visions on how to address a changing climate while ensuring a reliable energy supply. But neither has provided many details on how they would get there.

During her acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, Harris briefly mentioned climate change as she outlined “fundamental freedoms” at stake in the election, including “the freedom to breathe clean air and drink clean water and live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis.”

As vice president, Harris cast the tie-breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction Act, President Joe Biden’s landmark climate law that was approved with only Democratic support. As a senator from California, she was an early sponsor of the Green New Deal, a sweeping series of proposals meant to swiftly move the US to fully green energy that is championed by the Democratic Party’s most progressive wing.

Trump, meanwhile, led chants of “drill, baby, drill” and pledged to dismantle the Biden administration’s “green new scam” in his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention. He has vowed to boost production of fossil fuels such as oil, natural gas and coal and repeal key parts of the 2022 climate law.

“We have more liquid gold under our feet than any other country by far,” Trump said at the RNC, The AP reported. “We are a nation that has the opportunity to make an absolute fortune with its energy.”

‘Climate champion’ or unfair regulations? Environmental groups, who largely back Harris, call her a “proven climate champion” who will take on Big Oil and build on Biden's climate legacy, including policies that boost electric vehicles and limit planet-warming pollution from coal-fired power plants.

"We won’t go back to a climate denier in the Oval Office,'' said Lena Moffitt, executive director of Evergreen Action.

Republicans counter that Biden and Harris have spent four years adopting “punishing regulations” that target American energy while lavishing generous tax credits for electric vehicles and other green priorities that cost taxpayers billions of dollars.

“This onslaught of overreaching and outrageous climate rules will shut down power plants and increase energy costs for families across the country,'' said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo. "Republicans will work to stop them and fight for solutions that protect our air and water and allow our economy to grow.”

Democrats have a clear edge on the issue. More than half of US adults say they trust Harris “a lot” or “some” when it comes to addressing climate change, according to an AP-NORC poll conducted in July. About 7 in 10 say they have “not much” trust in Trump or “none at all” when it comes to climate. Fewer than half say they lack trust in Harris.

A look at where the two candidates stand on key climate and energy issues:

Fracking and offshore drilling Harris said during her short-lived 2020 presidential campaign that she opposed offshore drilling for oil and hydraulic fracturing, an oil and gas extraction process better known as fracking.

But her campaign has clarified that she no longer supports a ban on fracking, a common drilling practice that is crucial to the economy in Pennsylvania, a key swing state and the nation’s second-largest producer of natural gas.

“As vice president, I did not ban fracking. As president, I will not ban fracking,'' Harris told CNN Thursday in her first major television interview as the Democratic nominee. "We can grow ... a thriving clean energy economy without banning fracking.''

Kevin Book, managing director at ClearView Energy Partners, a Washington research firm, said Harris’ evolving views show she is “trying to balance climate voters and industry supporters,″ even as her campaign takes ”an adversarial stance″ with the oil and gas industry overall.

Harris and Democrats have cited new rules — authorized by the climate law — to increase royalties that oil and gas companies pay to drill or mine on public lands. She also has supported efforts to clean up old drilling sites and cap abandoned wells that often spew methane and other pollutants.

Trump, who pushed to roll back scores of environmental laws as president, says his goal is for the US to have the cheapest energy and electricity in the world. He’d increase oil drilling on public lands, offer tax breaks to oil, gas and coal producers and speed the approval of natural gas pipelines.

Electric vehicles Trump has frequently criticized tough new vehicle emissions rules imposed by Biden, incorrectly calling them an electric vehicle “mandate.″ Environmental Protection Agency rules issued this spring target tailpipe emissions from cars and trucks and encourage — but do not require — sales of new EVs to meet the new standards.

Trump has said EV manufacturing will destroy jobs in the auto industry. In recent months, however, he has softened his rhetoric, saying he’s for “a very small slice” of cars being electric.

The change comes after Tesla CEO Elon Musk “endorsed me very strongly,” Trump said at an August rally in Atlanta. Even so, industry officials expect Trump to roll back Biden’s EV push and attempt to repeal tax incentives that Trump claims benefit China.

Harris has not announced an EV plan but has strongly supported EVs as vice president. At a 2022 event in Seattle, she celebrated roughly $1 billion in federal grants to purchase about 2,500 “clean” school buses. As many as 25 million children ride the familiar yellow buses each school day, and they will have a healthier future with a cleaner fleet, Harris said.

The grants and other federal climate programs not only are aimed at “saving our children, but for them, saving our planet,″ she said.

Climate law, jobs Harris has focused on implementing the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law passed in 2021, as well as climate provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, which provided nearly $375 billion in financial incentives for electric cars, clean energy projects and manufacturing.

Under Biden and Harris, American manufacturers created more than 250,000 energy jobs last year, the Energy Department said, with clean energy accounting for more than half of those jobs.

Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, deride climate spending as a "money grab'' for environmental groups and say it will ship Americans' jobs to China and other countries while increasing energy prices at home.

“Kamala Harris cares more about climate change than about inflation,” Vance wrote in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal.

Goodbye Paris? Trump, who has cast climate change as a “hoax," withdrew the US from the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. He has vowed to do so again, calling the global plan to reduce carbon emissions unenforceable and a gift to China and other big polluters. Trump vows to end wind subsidies included in the climate law and eliminate regulations imposed and proposed by the Biden administration to increase the energy efficiency of lightbulbs, stoves, dishwashers and shower heads.

Harris has called the Paris Agreement crucial to address climate change and protect “our children’s future.″

The US returned to the Paris Agreement soon after Biden took office in 2021.

LNG pause After approving numerous projects to export liquefied natural gas, or LNG, the Biden administration in January paused consideration of new natural gas export terminals. The delay allows officials to review the economic and climate impacts of natural gas, a fossil fuel that emits methane, a potent greenhouse gas.

The decision aligned the Democratic president with environmentalists who fear the recent increase in LNG exports is locking in potentially catastrophic planet-warming emissions even as Biden has pledged to cut climate pollution in half by 2030.

Trump has said he would approve terminals “on my very first day back” in office.

Harris has not outlined plans for LNG exports, but analysts expect her to impose tough climate standards on export projects as part of her larger stance against large oil and gas companies.