IAEA Board Orders Iran to Cooperate ‘Urgently’ with Probe

The quarterly meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors in Vienna on Wednesday (EPA)
The quarterly meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors in Vienna on Wednesday (EPA)
TT

IAEA Board Orders Iran to Cooperate ‘Urgently’ with Probe

The quarterly meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors in Vienna on Wednesday (EPA)
The quarterly meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors in Vienna on Wednesday (EPA)

The atomic watchdog's board of governors has passed a resolution ordering Iran to cooperate urgently with the agency's investigation into uranium traces found at three undeclared sites.

The resolution says "it is essential and urgent" that Iran explains the origin of the uranium particles and more generally give the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) all the answers it requires.

A diplomat from the Board of Governors told Asharq Al-Awsat that according to the IAEA Statute and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the issue could be referred to the UN Security Council.

The resolution was adopted on Thursday with 26 votes in favor out of 35, five abstentions, and two countries absent. Only Russia and China voted against it.

"The Agency has reiterated to Iran that at this meeting it expects to start receiving from Iran technically credible explanations on these issues, including access to locations and material, as well as the taking of samples as appropriate," according to the resolution.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani accused earlier the western countries of practicing “political pressure” on Iran.

Kanaani warned of the "adverse effects" of the motion on the remaining technical issues with the UN body.

A European diplomat told Asharq Al-Awsat that it would be “wise” of Iran to cooperate with the IAEA.

“The western countries have many options” in case Iran didn’t show cooperation, the diplomat warned.

The European Union Ambassador to the IAEA, Stephan Klement, said that “the EU expects rapid and tangible progress to be achieved in the shortest time-frame and shall consider further action accordingly.”

“We stress that the implementation of modified Code 3.1 is a legal obligation for Iran under its CSA, which cannot be modified or suspended unilaterally, and urge Iran to resolve this issue.”

For his part, Iranian nuclear chief Mohammad Eslami backtracked previous statements he made Wednesday on the possibility of an IAEA delegation visiting Tehran. 

Eslami had announced that “for the moment, no visit of the agency is on the agenda.”

Yet, he affirmed on Thursday that any IAEA delegation may visit Iran.

Speaking to reporters after the first day of the Board of Governors meetings on Wednesday, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi rejected Iranian claims that the agency has been politicized and said Tehran needs to “start delivering something”.

Grossi expected Iran to start giving satisfactory answers during this visit.

Iran had reached an agreement with the agency last week on cooperating with the probe, following a visit of an Iranian delegation to Vienna and a meeting with Grossi.



Israel Plans to Hit ‘Strategic Target’ in Iran

A man takes a picture of a car that was damaged in the area where a projectile landed after Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 2, 2024. REUTERS/Nir Elias
A man takes a picture of a car that was damaged in the area where a projectile landed after Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 2, 2024. REUTERS/Nir Elias
TT

Israel Plans to Hit ‘Strategic Target’ in Iran

A man takes a picture of a car that was damaged in the area where a projectile landed after Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 2, 2024. REUTERS/Nir Elias
A man takes a picture of a car that was damaged in the area where a projectile landed after Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 2, 2024. REUTERS/Nir Elias

The Israeli government decided it will respond to the Iranian missile attack by hitting a strategic target deep in the Iranian territories, reports have said.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant will finalize targets, timing and means for the response to Iran's missile attack after coordinating with their US-led allies, the reports said on Wednesday.

The decision that there will be an Israeli military response to the Iranian attack came following two lengthy sessions of the war cabinet held on Wednesday after Tel Aviv confirmed that Iran fired more than 180 ballistic missiles at Israel.

The Iranian attack came shortly after a new opinion poll showed that Netanyahu’s popularity, which was battered after the Hamas attacks on October 7, has been boosted by his country’s military successes against Lebanon and Iran.

Therefore, Israel believes it is necessary to strongly respond on both fronts, even though the Iranian missiles did not kill any Israeli.

Two Conflicting Stories

On Tuesday, Iran was keen to inform Israel, via Washington, of its anticipated attack, similar to Tehran’s response on April 14 to the Israeli attack on its consulate in Damascus, where seven were killed, including two top commanders.

The Israeli army’s spokesman, Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, appeared two hours before the Iranian attack on Israel and asked the public to follow the Home Front Command guidelines, warning that a fire from Iran could be wide in scope.

Iran then primarily targeted military sites, claiming that 90% of the missiles it launched against Israel hit their targets successfully.

However, Israel denied this claim and said only few missiles landed while the majority was intercepted.

In fact, the majority of missiles were intercepted by Israel. But some ballistic missiles did manage to strike, damaging the Nevatim air base in southern Israel, a military compound north Tel Aviv and near the Ben Gurion International Airport in the city of Lod.

Following the ballistic attack, Iran tried to conclude a public deal with Israel, indirectly announcing that the attack was its final response to the killings of (Hamas chief) Ismail Haniyeh, (Hezbollah leader) Hassan Nasrallah and IRGC commander Abbas Nilforushan.

Iran indirectly signaled that it would not object to Israel's escalation in Lebanon and Syria, the ongoing military operations in Gaza and the West Bank, and any military attack against the Houthis in Yemen and Iranian proxies in Iraq.

But Israel's political and military leaderships consider that Iran had crossed the red lines by firing missiles towards Israel, and therefore, they demand a harsh deterrent response.

Iranian nuclear strike

The US administration clearly senses that Netanyahu is close to involving Washington in a war against Iran.

Netanyahu is convinced that the Iranian leadership has decided to develop a nuclear weapon. Therefore, the Israeli PM believes that the time has come to realize his ambitions and attack Iran’s nuclear sites.

Netanyahu knows that Israel lacks the capabilities to stage such an attack on Iran. Instead, he plans to drag the US into a showdown with Iran, and risks a broader war.

But the US administration is convinced that a military solution does not guarantee the destruction of Iran's nuclear program and that diplomatic channels are still an option.

The US had already resumed talks with Tehran on its nuclear program and says there could be a positive trend in this regard.

The administration in Washington believes Netanyahu is seeking to sabotage the US-Iran talks and is using the war on Gaza and Lebanon to push the American administration to end any political solution and instead, launch decisive strikes against Tehran.

Therefore, the US is discussing with Israel the response to the Iranian attack, but in a measured way.

Israeli observers point out that both sides are considering practical plans, in which the Americans aim to achieve some of the Israeli objectives but in a way that allows Iran adopt its former strategy of “patience” and therefore, not feel obliged to respond.