Lebanon: Berri Favors Dialogue, Awaits Response from Bassil, LF

 Lebanon's Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri casts his vote during a recent session to elect a President of the Republic. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Lebanon's Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri casts his vote during a recent session to elect a President of the Republic. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20

Lebanon: Berri Favors Dialogue, Awaits Response from Bassil, LF

 Lebanon's Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri casts his vote during a recent session to elect a President of the Republic. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Lebanon's Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri casts his vote during a recent session to elect a President of the Republic. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

A senior parliamentary source said that the overwhelming majority in the Lebanese parliament expressed its immediate approval of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri’s call to turn the parliamentary session, scheduled for next Thursday to elect a president for the republic, into a dialogue meeting, in an attempt to break the impasse that hinders the election.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, the source said that Berri was waiting for the reaction of the Lebanese Forces party (LF) and the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) to proceed accordingly.

Since the end of former President Michel Aoun’s tenure, successive parliamentary sessions have failed to elect a new president in light of deep divisions among the different blocs.

According to the parliamentary source, the mere approval of the two Christian parties to hold dialogue would mean that the path could be clear to agree on the name of the candidate who would enjoy the support of the parliamentary majority.

The coming hours will be decisive to determine the possibility of proceeding in an open dialogue session or returning to the failed election sessions, the source underlined.

Stressing that there was no alternative to dialogue, the deputy pointed out that the parliamentary blocs, including the Kataeb and the Progressive Socialist Party (PSP) have informed Berri of their approval of his call for dialogue, with the exception of the LF and the FPM.

The source noted that Berri was not in favor of holding an election session that would then turn into a dialogue, stressing that such proposal was politically useless.

He added that the approval of one of the two parties would prompt Berri to confirm his call for dialogue, which will be held in a designated meeting room within the Parliament building, with the participation of between 12-15 deputies, who represent the different parliamentary blocs and independents.



US Envoy Reaffirms Backing for Damascus, Rules Out ‘Plan B’

US Ambassador to Türkiye and Special Envoy for Syria, Thomas Barrack, arrives for a meeting with the Lebanese prime minister at the government palace in Beirut, Lebanon, 07 July 2025. EPA/WAEL HAMZEH
US Ambassador to Türkiye and Special Envoy for Syria, Thomas Barrack, arrives for a meeting with the Lebanese prime minister at the government palace in Beirut, Lebanon, 07 July 2025. EPA/WAEL HAMZEH
TT
20

US Envoy Reaffirms Backing for Damascus, Rules Out ‘Plan B’

US Ambassador to Türkiye and Special Envoy for Syria, Thomas Barrack, arrives for a meeting with the Lebanese prime minister at the government palace in Beirut, Lebanon, 07 July 2025. EPA/WAEL HAMZEH
US Ambassador to Türkiye and Special Envoy for Syria, Thomas Barrack, arrives for a meeting with the Lebanese prime minister at the government palace in Beirut, Lebanon, 07 July 2025. EPA/WAEL HAMZEH

The United States will keep backing Syria’s government and has no “Plan B” to working with it to unite the war‑scarred country back together, still reeling from years of civil war and wracked by new sectarian violence, US envoy Tom Barrack said on Monday.

In an interview with the Associated Press, Barrack – Washington’s ambassador to Türkiye and special envoy for Syria, who is also on a short assignment in Lebanon – called last week’s Israeli strikes inside Syria “badly timed” and said they had “complicated efforts to stabilize the region.”

Barrack spoke in Beirut after more than a week of clashes in Sweida province between Druze militiamen and Sunni Bedouin tribes.

Over the weekend he brokered what he described as a limited ceasefire between Syria and Israel, aimed only at halting the fighting in Sweida. Syrian government troops have since redeployed in the area and evacuated civilians from both communities on Monday, he said.

Barrack told the AP that “the killing, the revenge, the massacres on both sides” are “intolerable,” but that “the current government of Syria, in my opinion, has conducted themselves as best they can as a nascent government with very few resources to address the multiplicity of issues that arise in trying to bring a diverse society together.”

Regarding Israel’s strikes on Syria, Barrack said: “The United States was not asked, nor did they participate in that decision, nor was it the United States’ responsibility in matters that Israel feels is for its own self-defense.”

However, he said Israel’s intervention “creates another very confusing chapter” and “came at a very bad time.”

Prior to the violence in Sweida, Israel and Syria had been in talks over security matters, while the Trump administration had been pushing them to move toward full normalization of diplomatic relations.

When the latest fighting erupted, “Israel’s view was that south of Damascus was this questionable zone, so that whatever happened militarily in that zone needed to be agreed upon and discussed with them,” Barrack said. “The new government (in Syria) coming in was not exactly of that belief.”

The ceasefire announced Saturday between Syria and Israel is a limited agreement addressing only the conflict in Sweida, he said. It does not address broader issues including Israel’s contention that the area south of Damascus should be a demilitarized zone.

In the discussions leading up to the ceasefire, Barrack said “both sides did the best they can” to reach agreement on specific questions related to the movement of Syrian forces and equipment from Damascus to Sweida.

He suggested that Israel would prefer to see Syria fragmented and divided rather than a strong central state in control of the country.

Later Monday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz posted on X that Israel’s strikes “were the only way to stop the massacre of the Druze in Syria, the brothers of our brothers the Israeli Druze”.

Katz added: “Anyone who criticizes the attacks is unaware of the facts,” he continued. It was not clear if he was responding to Barrack’s comments.

Damascus has been negotiating with the Kurdish forces that control much of northeast Syria to implement an agreement that would merge the US-backed, Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces with the new national army.