Libyan Parliament Rejects Egypt’s ‘Unilateral’ Demarcation of Maritime Borders

Interim Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh partakes in the opening of the Tripoli Forum for Governmental Communication (Unity Government)
Interim Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh partakes in the opening of the Tripoli Forum for Governmental Communication (Unity Government)
TT

Libyan Parliament Rejects Egypt’s ‘Unilateral’ Demarcation of Maritime Borders

Interim Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh partakes in the opening of the Tripoli Forum for Governmental Communication (Unity Government)
Interim Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh partakes in the opening of the Tripoli Forum for Governmental Communication (Unity Government)

The Foreign Affairs and Defense Committees of the Libyan Parliament reiterated their rejection of Egypt’s unilateral demarcation of the western maritime borders.

In a joint statement, the two committees considered this declaration “an unacceptable violation of Libyan sovereignty.”

The committees expressed their surprise at Egypt’s declaration, without any prior consultations.

They stated that “this step at this difficult time that the country is going through is a violation of Libyan interests in the Mediterranean. This is an unfair demarcation under international law, which clearly encroaches on the Libyan maritime borders.”

They confirmed their rejection of the decision, and renewed their request that Cairo immediately retract its declaration. They said the move “harms the historical relations between the two countries, as Egypt is expected to take into account the political circumstances that Libya is going through.”

The committees stressed that “any demarcation should be through negotiations that guarantee the mutual interests of the two countries, and in accordance with the principles of the UN and the Laws of the Sea.”

Separately, Libyan parliamentary spokesman Abdullah Bilheg denied what was reported about closing parliamentary headquarters in the eastern city of Benghazi.

“We warn all media not to be drawn into this false news,” said Bilheg.

Moreover, sources close to Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, Commander-in-Chief of the Libyan National Army, which is stationed in the east of the country, denied intentions for announcing the separation of the eastern region from western Libya.

Some had claimed that Haftar wanted to install himself as a military ruler of the Cyrenaica region.

Hours before Haftar’s Independence Day speech, in Al-Kish Square in the eastern city of Benghazi, his opponents said that he was about to announce the disengagement or separation of eastern and southern Libya from Tripoli.

Some also predicted that the leader would announce the closure of oil fields and ports.



Israel Sees More to Do on Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon,  January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
TT

Israel Sees More to Do on Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon,  January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo

Israel said on Thursday the terms of a ceasefire with Hezbollah were not being implemented fast enough and there was more work to do, while the Iran-backed group urged pressure to ensure Israeli troops leave south Lebanon by Monday as set out in the deal.

The deal stipulates that Israeli troops withdraw from south Lebanon, Hezbollah remove fighters and weapons from the area and Lebanese troops deploy there - all within a 60-day timeframe which will conclude on Monday at 4 a.m (0200 GMT).

The deal, brokered by the United States and France, ended more than a year of hostilities triggered by the Gaza war. The fighting peaked with a major Israeli offensive that displaced more than 1.2 million people in Lebanon and left Hezbollah severely weakened.

"There have been positive movements where the Lebanese army and UNIFIL have taken the place of Hezbollah forces, as stipulated in the agreement," Israeli government spokesmen David Mencer told reporters, referring to UN peacekeepers in Lebanon.

"We've also made clear that these movements have not been fast enough, and there is much more work to do," he said, affirming that Israel wanted the agreement to continue.

Mencer did not directly respond to questions about whether Israel had requested an extension of the deal or say whether Israeli forces would remain in Lebanon after Monday's deadline.

Hezbollah said in a statement that there had been leaks talking about Israel postponing its withdrawal beyond the 60-day period, and that any breach of the agreement would be unacceptable.
The statement said that possibility required everyone, especially Lebanese political powers, to pile pressure on the states which sponsored the deal to ensure "the implementation of the full (Israeli) withdrawal and the deployment of the Lebanese army to the last inch of Lebanese territory and the return of the people to their villages quickly.”

Any delay beyond the 60 days would mark a blatant violation of the deal with which the Lebanese state would have to deal "through all means and methods guaranteed by international charters" to recover Lebanese land "from the occupation's clutches," Hezbollah said.