Israel’s New Defense Minister: Netanyahu Loyalist, Settlers’ Friend 

A file photo taken on March 26, 2010 shows Israeli officer general Yoav Galant, chief of the south command, during a press conference near the border with the Gaza Strip. (AFP)
A file photo taken on March 26, 2010 shows Israeli officer general Yoav Galant, chief of the south command, during a press conference near the border with the Gaza Strip. (AFP)
TT

Israel’s New Defense Minister: Netanyahu Loyalist, Settlers’ Friend 

A file photo taken on March 26, 2010 shows Israeli officer general Yoav Galant, chief of the south command, during a press conference near the border with the Gaza Strip. (AFP)
A file photo taken on March 26, 2010 shows Israeli officer general Yoav Galant, chief of the south command, during a press conference near the border with the Gaza Strip. (AFP)

Israel's new defense minister Yoav Galant is a former general, a staunch ally of Benjamin Netanyahu and a vocal advocate of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. 

In the military, the 64-year-old oversaw Israel's 2005 withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and later commanded the "Operation Cast Lead" offensive against its Hamas rulers in 2008-2009.  

Since entering politics in 2015, he has served as minister for education, housing and immigration -- and has been a prominent backer of Israel's settlements, regarded as illegal under international law, that are today home to some 475,000 settlers. 

Some observers fear a radical change in policy on the occupied West Bank under Netanyahu's new government. 

Shlomo Neeman, who heads the Yesha Council, an umbrella group representing Israeli settlers living in the West Bank, welcomed Galant ahead of his appointment on Thursday. 

"Yoav Galant is a man who has done a lot for the settlement of Judea and Samaria," he said, using the Jewish biblical terms for the West Bank. 

Ahead of his nomination, Galant's predecessor Benny Gantz spoke with Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas, stressing "the important ties forged between the Israeli defense establishment and political echelon and the Palestinian Authority".  

Galant, born in the Mediterranean port of Jaffa in 1958 to Polish Holocaust survivors, was a career soldier.  

He was an officer in the elite marine unite known as Flotilla-13 when it carried out an operation against the Palestinian Fatah movement in Lebanon in 1978.  

The unit killed around 20 Palestinian gunmen, etching the operation into the Israeli military's history books.  

Top general  

Between 1982 and 1984, Galant took a break from the army to become a lumberjack in Alaska.  

Galant reached the rank of general in 2002, serving as former prime minister Ariel Sharon's military attaché.  

Galant would later rise to become commander of the southern military command, overseeing Israel's 2005 withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, including the evacuation of 8,000 settlers from the Palestinian enclave. 

He then commanded Israel's "Operation Cast Lead", a 22-day operation in Gaza that killed 1,440 Palestinians and 13 Israelis.  

A United Nations report accused both Israel and Hamas of war crimes during that conflict.  

Nominated as the army's chief of staff in 2010, Galant was mired in scandal over the appropriation of public land to build his house.  

An investigative report led to a petition in the supreme court which did not result in criminal charges, but posed potential legal problems to his appointment.  

Instead, Benny Gantz, whom Galant now succeeds at the defense ministry, was selected.  

After leaving the army, he became director of a drilling company owned by Franco-Israeli tycoon Beny Steinmetz, but resigned in 2014 to enter politics.  

In 2015, Galant served as housing minister as part of the center-right Kulanu party, though he later joined Netanyahu's right-wing Likud in 2019.  

Under previous Netanyahu governments, Galant served as both immigration and education minister between 2019 and 2021. 



Israel Follows Iran Negotiations amid its Broadest Escalation in Eastern Lebanon

A bulldozer clears debris near heavily damaged buildings in the village of Bednayel in the eastern Bekaa plain of Lebanon (AFP).
A bulldozer clears debris near heavily damaged buildings in the village of Bednayel in the eastern Bekaa plain of Lebanon (AFP).
TT

Israel Follows Iran Negotiations amid its Broadest Escalation in Eastern Lebanon

A bulldozer clears debris near heavily damaged buildings in the village of Bednayel in the eastern Bekaa plain of Lebanon (AFP).
A bulldozer clears debris near heavily damaged buildings in the village of Bednayel in the eastern Bekaa plain of Lebanon (AFP).

The intense Israeli airstrikes that targeted the Bekaa in eastern Lebanon on Thursday evening marked the broadest aerial escalation against the Bekaa since the ceasefire agreement entered into force. This came a week after the killing of eight members of Hezbollah, including a commander, whom Israel said were responsible for launching rockets.

The pace of events does not reflect a clear upward military trajectory, but is instead linked to domestic and regional political calculations, at a moment coinciding with US-Iranian negotiations and the possibility of changes to the rules of engagement, according to experts following the developments.

Fire map... intensity and rapid succession

On Thursday evening, Israeli aircraft carried out eight strikes on the outskirts of Shmustar in the Western Mountain Range. The raids also hit the outskirts of Budai and Harbata. Less than half an hour later, shelling resumed heavily on the outskirts of Budai and the surroundings of Baalbek, amid low-altitude drone activity. The strikes extended to the outskirts of the city of Hermel, while the vicinity of the town of Taminine was also targeted, in addition to another strike on the outskirts of Budai, before new raids were launched on the outskirts of Nabi Sheet.

What stood out was not only the number of strikes, but the speed of their succession and the breadth of the geographic area, suggesting the management of concentrated fire rather than isolated attacks.

Local sources described the raids as “highly explosive,” telling Asharq Al-Awsat that “the tremors were heard in towns far from the strike locations, which caused panic and led some residents to believe that war had effectively begun, especially amid the charged regional atmosphere.”

The Ministry of Public Health announced that the strikes resulted in two deaths, including a Syrian child and a woman, and left 29 people wounded.

A political message

In an analytical reading linking the battlefield to politics, retired Brig. Gen. Naji Malaeb said that targeting the Bekaa in the recent phase was not a tactical detail, but carried clear political indications. He told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the Israeli escalation in Lebanon has two main objectives.

The first is to send a message to those betting on the Lebanese Army’s ability to carry out the task of disarming Hezbollah, as Israel is trying to say it will intervene if it sees that the army has not done what it wants. The second is linked to expanding the margin of military action in areas it considers less costly in terms of official Lebanese reactions.”

Malaeb pointed to the development in the use of concussion bombs, considering that “Israel is seeking through this to show that the targeted sites are weapons or ammunition storage areas.” He noted, however, that “the Radwan Force that Israel claimed to have targeted in Thursday’s raids is an elite unit that relies on rapid movement and guerrilla warfare, and uses medium weapons that can be carried, not a traditional artillery or missile force that requires large depots or fixed infrastructure.”

Malaeb said that “Israel’s focus on naming the Radwan Force in its statements serves an internal objective, namely reassuring settlers in the Upper Galilee that the threat is under control,” adding: “Israelis talk about the redeployment of the Radwan Force and the possibility of it storming areas inside Israel; therefore, the focus is on targeting it to give residents there a sense of security.”

In a broader context, Malaeb said that “the three-hour meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump constituted a pivotal moment, as European information indicates that Israel was given a free hand in Lebanon in particular, within a wider margin of maneuver in the Middle East.”

He added: “The decision in the region is US by nature, of course, but in Lebanon it appears to be Israeli, and this is what we have observed on the ground, whether through the performance of envoys who come to Beirut, or through what was called the mechanism, whose role has effectively been canceled.”

He said that “the role that was supposed to be headed by an American party has turned into a tool of nullification rather than activation, as we have not seen a single objection to any of the Israeli attacks, which means that Israel is the one deciding how escalation unfolds in Lebanon.”

Israel’s conditions

The escalation in the Bekaa coincided with political and security rhetoric raising the level of possibilities in the region. The Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth reported that “the possibility of Hezbollah entering the fighting against Israel if Iran is attacked is worrying and is being dealt with.”

Malaeb said that “giving Israel a free hand in Lebanon is linked to what will take place between the United States and Iran,” adding: “The decision between Washington and Tehran is American in essence, and could lead to understandings if interests converge, but Israel’s interest is different, as it views long-range missiles and Iran’s nuclear program as an existential threat.”

He noted that “if the elements of Iran’s nuclear capability remain in place, and a final halt to enrichment is not achieved as Israel demands, then the likelihood of war remains. Israel may be the one to initiate it, while the US side may intervene later to rein in its pace, because any Iranian response would be wide-ranging, and it cannot be ruled out that Hezbollah would become involved in the confrontation within this context.”


What Is Israel’s Multi-Layered Defense Against Iranian Missiles? 

A fragment falls through the sky after Israel's Iron Dome intercepted a missile launched from Iran towards Israel, amid the Iran-Israel conflict, as seen from Ashkelon, Israel June 20, 2025. (Reuters)
A fragment falls through the sky after Israel's Iron Dome intercepted a missile launched from Iran towards Israel, amid the Iran-Israel conflict, as seen from Ashkelon, Israel June 20, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

What Is Israel’s Multi-Layered Defense Against Iranian Missiles? 

A fragment falls through the sky after Israel's Iron Dome intercepted a missile launched from Iran towards Israel, amid the Iran-Israel conflict, as seen from Ashkelon, Israel June 20, 2025. (Reuters)
A fragment falls through the sky after Israel's Iron Dome intercepted a missile launched from Iran towards Israel, amid the Iran-Israel conflict, as seen from Ashkelon, Israel June 20, 2025. (Reuters)

Israel has multi-layered air defenses against attacks by Iranian ballistic missiles, an umbrella it may need to lean on as the United States and Iran teeter toward potential military conflict that could draw Iranian attacks on Israeli territory. Here are details of Israel's defenses against drones and missiles:

ARROW

The long-range Arrow-2 and Arrow-3 interceptors, developed by Israel with an Iranian missile threat in mind, are designed to engage incoming targets both in and outside the atmosphere respectively. They operate at an altitude that allows for safe dispersal of any non-conventional warheads.

State-owned Israel Aerospace Industries is the project's main contractor while Boeing is involved in producing the interceptors.

DAVID'S SLING

The mid-range David's Sling system is designed to ‌shoot down ballistic ‌missiles fired from 100 km to 200 km (62-124 miles) away.

Developed ‌and ⁠manufactured jointly by Israel's ⁠state-owned Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and RTX Corp, a US company previously known as Raytheon, David's Sling is also designed to intercept aircraft, drones and cruise missiles.

IRON DOME

The short-range Iron Dome air defense system was built to intercept the kind of rockets fired by Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza.

Developed with US backing, it became operational in 2011. Each truck-towed unit fires radar-guided missiles to blow up short-range threats such as rockets, ⁠mortars and drones in mid-air.

A naval version of the Iron Dome, ‌to protect ships and sea-based assets, was deployed ‌in 2017.

The system determines whether a rocket is on course to hit a populated area. If ‌not, the rocket is ignored and allowed to land harmlessly.

Iron Dome was originally ‌billed as providing city coverage against rockets with ranges of between 4 km and 70 km (2.5-43 miles), but experts say this has since been expanded.

IRON BEAM

Developed by Israel for more than a decade and declared fully operational in late 2025, the ground-based, high-power Iron Beam laser system ‌is designed to intercept smaller aerial threats, such as UAVs and mortars.

Using lasers to super-heat and disable aerial threats, Iron ⁠Beam's operation is ⁠expected to be substantially cheaper than some of the other aerial defense systems that use intercepting missiles to shoot down incoming threats.

US THAAD SYSTEM

The US military said in October 2024 that it had sent the advanced anti-missile system THAAD - Terminal High Altitude Area Defense - to Israel.

THAAD is a critical part of the US military's air defenses and is designed to intercept and destroy short, medium and intermediate-range ballistic missile threats in their terminal phase of flight.

The US military helped to shoot down Iranian missiles fired at Israel, using ground-based systems, one US official said in June 2025, after Israel attacked Iranian nuclear facilities. A US Navy destroyer in the Eastern Mediterranean also helped to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles, Israeli media has reported.

AIR-TO-AIR DEFENSE

Israeli combat helicopters and fighter jets have fired air-to-air missiles to destroy drones that were heading to Israel, military officials have said.


Iranian Agents Obstructed Care at Hospitals Packed with Wounded Protesters 

This image from video taken between Jan. 9 and Jan. 11, 2026, and verified by AP, shows bodies and mourners outside a morgue in Iran, following a crackdown on protests in Kahrizak, Tehran province. (UGC via AP, File)
This image from video taken between Jan. 9 and Jan. 11, 2026, and verified by AP, shows bodies and mourners outside a morgue in Iran, following a crackdown on protests in Kahrizak, Tehran province. (UGC via AP, File)
TT

Iranian Agents Obstructed Care at Hospitals Packed with Wounded Protesters 

This image from video taken between Jan. 9 and Jan. 11, 2026, and verified by AP, shows bodies and mourners outside a morgue in Iran, following a crackdown on protests in Kahrizak, Tehran province. (UGC via AP, File)
This image from video taken between Jan. 9 and Jan. 11, 2026, and verified by AP, shows bodies and mourners outside a morgue in Iran, following a crackdown on protests in Kahrizak, Tehran province. (UGC via AP, File)

As wounded anti-government protesters poured into an Iranian hospital during last month’s crackdown, a young doctor hurried to the emergency room to help treat a man in his 40s who had been shot in the head at close range.

When the doctor and others tried to resuscitate the man, a group of armed, plainclothes security agents blocked their way, pushing some back with their rifles, the doctor told The Associated Press.

“They surrounded him and didn’t allow us to move further,” the doctor in the northern city of Rasht said.

Minutes later, the man was dead. The agents put his body in a black body bag. Later, they piled it and other bodies into the back of a van and drove away.

This wasn’t an isolated incident.

Over the course of a few days in early January, plainclothes agents swarmed hospitals in multiple cities treating the thousands wounded by Iranian security forces who fired on crowds to quash massive protests against the regime. These agents monitored and sometimes obstructed care to protesters, intimidated staff, seized protesters and took away the dead in body bags. Dozens of doctors were arrested.

This story is based on AP interviews with three doctors in Iran and six Iranian medical professionals living abroad who are in contact with colleagues on the ground; reports from human rights groups; and AP’s verification of more than a dozen videos posted on social media. All of the doctors inside Iran spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation.

The AP worked with Mnemonic, a Berlin-based organization, to identify online videos, posts and other material relating to violence in hospitals.

The doctors in Iran and abroad said the level of brutality and militarization of health facilities was unprecedented in a country that for decades has experienced crackdowns on dissent and surveillance of public institutions.

The Iran Human Rights Center, based in Oslo, has documented multiple accounts from inside hospitals of security agents preventing medical care, removing patients from ventilators, harassing doctors and detaining protesters.

The government has blamed the protests and ensuing violence on armed foreign-backed “terrorists.”

Health Ministry spokesman Hossein Kermanpour denied reports of treatment being prevented or protesters being taken from hospitals, calling them “untrue, but also fundamentally impossible.” He was quoted in state media as saying all injured were treated “without any discrimination or interference over political opinions.” The Iranian mission at the United Nations did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the doctors’ accounts.

Doctors tried to protect the wounded

The crackdown, which reached its height on Jan. 8 and 9, was the deadliest since the regime took power in 1979. Details have been slow to emerge because of internet restrictions imposed by authorities.

The Human Rights Activists News Agency says it confirmed more than 7,000 deaths and that it is investigating thousands more. The government has acknowledged more than 3,000 killed, though it has undercounted or not reported fatalities from past unrest.

Once the crackdown began, the doctor in Rasht said he worked through 66 hours of hell, moving each day to a different facility to help with the wounded — first a trauma center, then a hospital and finally a private clinic.

Armed agents brought in wounded protesters and stood watch over them as staff worked, the doctor said. When it came time to discharge a patient, he said, “they would take anyone who was confirmed to be a protester.”

The doctor said he and other staff tried to hide wounded protesters by recording false diagnoses in hospital records.

“We knew that no matter what we did for the patients, they wouldn’t be safe once they stepped out of the hospital,” he said.

The AP could not independently confirm the doctor’s account of events at the hospital in Rasht. But it conformed with AP’s other reporting.

AP’s reporting focused on what happened at four hospitals, a snapshot of the Iranian security forces’ activity. Mnemonic gathered dozens of videos, posts and other accounts it says showed forces were present in and around nine hospitals, in some cases firing guns and tear gas. Mnemonic has been preserving digital evidence of human rights violations in Iran since 2022, creating with partners an archive of more than 2 million documents.

One video verified by AP shows security agents breaking through glass entrance doors into Imam Khomeini Hospital in the western city of Ilam. They then barged through the halls with their guns, yelling at people.

The Health Ministry told state media it was investigating the incident, saying it was committed to protecting medical centers, staff and patients.

Treating the wounded in hiding

On the night of Jan. 8, a 37-year-old general surgeon was out for dinner in Tehran when he received a call from a professional friend, an ophthalmologist. The fear in her voice made clear she needed his help urgently. She gave him an address.

Just before midnight, he drove to the address, a clinic for cosmetic procedures. Inside, he found the lobby transformed into a trauma ward, with more than 30 wounded men, women, children and elderly on the couches and blood-covered floor, shouting and crying,

The surgeon spent nearly four days there, treating more than 90 people, he estimates. At first, it was just him, the ophthalmologist, a dentist and two nurses. Eventually, the surgeon summoned three other doctors to help.

He used cardboard boxes and pieces of soft metal as splints for broken bones. With no anesthesia or strong painkillers, he used weaker suppository analgesics. The clinic had no blood supplies or transfusion capabilities.

They couldn’t send patients to hospitals for fear they’d be arrested.

A young man in his 20s had been shot with live ammunition in his elbow, shattering it. The surgeon sutured the wounds but knew the arm would have to be amputated.

A family of four — a mother, father and their 8- and 10-year-old children — were all riddled with pellets, the surgeon said.

On the morning of Jan. 9, the surgeon reached out to doctors he trusted to refer patients to them. First he had to make sure to remove all bullets and pellets from their bodies so they wouldn’t be detained at the hospital. He wrote referral letters saying the patients had been in car accidents.

None of the wounded died at the clinic, he said. The AP could not independently confirm the surgeon’s account of events at the clinic.

Doctors targeted for arrest

Since Jan. 9, at least 79 health care professionals have been detained, including a dozen medical students, according to Homa Fathi, an Iranian dentist pursuing a Ph.D. in Canada and member of IIPHA who has been monitoring Iranian government action against health professionals since 2022.

Around 30 have been released, most on bail, but many of them still face charges, including one accused of “waging war against God,” a charge that carries a death penalty, Fathi said.

The surgeon who treated protesters at the secret clinic said he was surprised security forces never stormed that location to make arrests.

But arrests have come since. Two health care workers who volunteered at the clinic were seized from their homes, the surgeon said.

“I am waiting, too.”