Israeli Settlers Insist on Rebuilding Homesh Settlement Near Jenin

Armed settlers in the West Bank (Wafa) 
Armed settlers in the West Bank (Wafa) 
TT
20

Israeli Settlers Insist on Rebuilding Homesh Settlement Near Jenin

Armed settlers in the West Bank (Wafa) 
Armed settlers in the West Bank (Wafa) 

A group of settler leaders, headed by the chief Ashkenazi rabbi, David Lau, toured the Homesh settlement, declaring their determination to rebuild the region, despite US warnings, the position of High Court of Justice in West Jerusalem, and the law that prohibits their entry to the area.  

The Homesh settlement is one of four evacuated according to a 2005 law established under Ariel Sharon's government and part of the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank.  

According to the law, the sites became closed military areas banned for entry and residence. But Ehud Olmert's government did not demolish the houses at the time. His government did, however, demolish all settlements and houses in the Gaza settlements.  

The settlers wanted to return to the Homesh buildings and kept revisiting the region, aiming to relocate there. They also established a religious school there.  

However, entry to the area is illegal. An indictment was filed against Rabbi Elisha Cohen, the prominent cleric in the settlement because he visited it after its evacuation.  

The settlement is located in an isolated area between Nablus and Jenin.  

On Thursday, Cohen toured the area with Lau and other settler leaders, stressing that the government of Benjamin Netanyahu "pledged to the allies" to amend the disengagement law from Gaza and rebuild the four settlements, including Homesh.  

US President Joe Biden's administration expressed opposition to building new settlements in the West Bank, in general, and in Homesh, in particular.   

State Department spokesman Ned Price asserted that the Homesh outpost in the West Bank is illegal.  

“It is illegal to even under Israeli law. Our call to refrain from unilateral steps certainly includes any decision to create a new settlement, to legalize outposts, or allow the building of any kind deep in the West Bank adjacent to Palestinian communities or on private Palestinian land,” Price asserted.  

At the same time, the Israeli Supreme Court of Justice discussed the issue. The judges asked the government to explain the reason for not evacuating the settlement so far, despite the law confirming its illegality.  

The government said it was looking forward to changing official policy toward Homesh in line with the coalition agreement that called for licensing an illegal yeshiva at the site and rebuilding the settlement. 

The Court responded with an order instructing the government to answer within 90 days as to why the outpost has not been cleared. 



Sudan War at 'Turning Point' but No End in Sight, Analysts Say

Sudan-paramilitary-Rapid-Support-Forces-RSF-soldiers-in-Khartoum-18-June-2019. Reuters
Sudan-paramilitary-Rapid-Support-Forces-RSF-soldiers-in-Khartoum-18-June-2019. Reuters
TT
20

Sudan War at 'Turning Point' but No End in Sight, Analysts Say

Sudan-paramilitary-Rapid-Support-Forces-RSF-soldiers-in-Khartoum-18-June-2019. Reuters
Sudan-paramilitary-Rapid-Support-Forces-RSF-soldiers-in-Khartoum-18-June-2019. Reuters

Sudan's army has recaptured the presidential palace from rival paramilitaries and is pushing ahead to wrest full control of the capital, but analysts warn that the brutal two-year war is far from over.
In the early days of the fighting, the army-aligned government was forced to flee Khartoum, which army forces are now a breath away from regaining -- the result of a counteroffensive launched late last year after a succession of humiliating defeats.
"This victory is a turning point as it redraws the battle lines, making the territorial divide starker than ever," said Sharath Srinivasan, a professor at Cambridge University who studies Sudan.
But with large areas still controlled by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), "the fight is definitely far from finished," he told AFP.
"Neither side is ready to back down."
Hours after losing the presidential palace, an RSF drone strike on the complex killed three state TV crew members and multiple soldiers.
As army troops moved to clear central Khartoum of RSF fighters, the paramilitaries launched artillery strikes on residential neighborhoods in the city and claimed territory in remote areas of the country.
According to analysts, the RSF may be seeking to keep the army occupied in Khartoum, allowing the paramilitary force to consolidate its hold on the vast western region of Darfur, where the United States has said it had committed genocide.
'Biggest flashpoints'
Tens of thousands of people have been killed since April 2023 in the war, which according to the UN has uprooted more than 12 million and created the world's largest hunger and displacement crises.
It has also torn Sudan in two, leaving the country divided into competing zones of control.
According to Sudanese analyst Kholood Khair, "the biggest flashpoints right now in this war are Khartoum and El-Fasher," the only state capital in Darfur that the RSF has not conquered despite besieging the city for 10 months.
Last week its fighters took Al-Malha, "a strategic point" in the fight to seize full control of Darfur, according to Khair.
Located about 200 kilometers (125 miles) from El-Fasher, the North Darfur state capital, Al-Malha is one of the northernmost towns in the desert region on Sudan's border with Libya.
Controlling it could help the RSF secure the compromised supply lines that analysts say have hindered its Darfur campaign, and allow the paramilitary force to bring in more fighters, fuel and weapons.
With the RSF emboldened in Darfur, "the territorial division that's occurring could mean a de facto separation," Srinivasan said.
Last month, the RSF and its allies signed a charter to establish their own government in opposition-held territories, a move that the UN Security Council warned would further fragment the country.
Cameron Hudson, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that a key question is whether the army will "be content" with retaking Khartoum and holding its ground in Sudan's north and east, or whether it will push westward to destroy the RSF.
Detente?
Either way, the authorities will face "enormous pressure" as millions of displaced people hope to return to reclaimed territories, Hudson told AFP.
There is also the threat of mass starvation and a heightened risk of atrocities against civilians, which both sides have been accused of.
"There's obviously a fork in the road ahead after the army takes Khartoum," said Alan Boswell, Horn of Africa director at the International Crisis Group think tank.
"Either more war, or a pivot to try and end this through peace talks," he told AFP.
Neither side have shown any appetite for a truce, but the latest army gains offer an opportunity for its "main backers to try and wind this war down", said Boswell.
Hours after his troops recaptured the presidential palace, and with the government still operating out of Port Sudan on the Red Sea rather than returning to Khartoum, Burhan vowed there would be "no negotiations" without a full RSF retreat.