Iraq Ignores Iran's Objection to Using 'Arabian Gulf' Name

A building draped with giant flags of the Gulf states in Basra (File photo: AFP)
A building draped with giant flags of the Gulf states in Basra (File photo: AFP)
TT
20

Iraq Ignores Iran's Objection to Using 'Arabian Gulf' Name

A building draped with giant flags of the Gulf states in Basra (File photo: AFP)
A building draped with giant flags of the Gulf states in Basra (File photo: AFP)

Iraq ignored the Iranian protest against using the "Arabian Gulf" name and did not comment on Foreign Ministry's spokesperson Naser Kanaani's complaint, saying that authorities should take necessary measures.

Earlier, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shiaa al-Sudani opened the Gulf Cup 25, referring to it as the "Arabian Gulf Cup" to welcome the delegations.

The "Arabian Gulf" is a common phrase in Iraq and through all official correspondence.

Leader of the al-Sadr movement Muqtada al-Sadr also used the term "Arabian Gulf" in his tweet to welcome the Arab guests to Basra.

Meanwhile, an expert on Iraqi international and maritime borders, Jamal al-Halbousi, asserted that each country has its history within the region, referring to Iraq and Iran.

Halbousi explained to Asharq Al-Awsat that the first map devised in the eighteenth century was French and referred to the area as the "Arabian Gulf", adding that history referred to Khosraw within Mesopotamia and did not reach the banks of the Gulf.

He noted that the Gulf bore multiple names, such as the Arabian Gulf, the Arabian Sea, the Sea of Oman, the Gulf, or the Sea of Basra for the area confined between the Strait of Hormuz and the Arabian Sea.

Halbousi explained that the Shatt al-Arab is an area in an Arab region, adding that there was an Iraqi area in the Iranian side, but it was Arabian.

He asserted that the designation for a specific time does not mean that it was binding for another country.

Media professor at Ahl al-Bayt University Ghalib al-Daami believed the Iranian objection is unjustified and incorrect because the Gulf has been referred to as the Arabian Gulf. It was also known as the Gulf of Basra.

People residing on the banks of the waterway are Arabs, whether from Iranian regions or Gulf states.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Daami wondered why Iran did not object previously when the tournament was organized in Kuwait, Qatar, and other countries and only objected when it was organized in Iraq.

He also questioned why Tehran did not object to the former regime, which referred to the Arabian Gulf in all its political statements.

The expert believed the issue is more significant than just naming the Gulf but rather related to the public interaction in Basra in receiving Arabs from the Gulf countries and the unparalleled support for the Gulf teams or audience.

Daami believed the Iraqi government should reject the Iranian protest and deepen its Arab-Gulf relations while maintaining good relations with Iran, based on Iraq's ultimate interest.



Japan, China Trade Barbs over Fighter Jet Maneuvers

China and Japan traded barbs after a Chinese J-15 fighter jet followed a Japanese patrol plane at the weekend. Handout / Japan's Ministry of Defense/AFP
China and Japan traded barbs after a Chinese J-15 fighter jet followed a Japanese patrol plane at the weekend. Handout / Japan's Ministry of Defense/AFP
TT
20

Japan, China Trade Barbs over Fighter Jet Maneuvers

China and Japan traded barbs after a Chinese J-15 fighter jet followed a Japanese patrol plane at the weekend. Handout / Japan's Ministry of Defense/AFP
China and Japan traded barbs after a Chinese J-15 fighter jet followed a Japanese patrol plane at the weekend. Handout / Japan's Ministry of Defense/AFP

Beijing condemned on Thursday what it called "dangerous behavior" by a Japanese military plane over the Pacific after Tokyo said Chinese fighter jets flew unusually close to its aircraft at the weekend.

The Japanese government had complained to China over the incident, in which no Japanese military personnel were reported injured.

A Chinese J-15 fighter jet from the Shandong aircraft carrier followed a Japanese P-3C patrol plane for 40 minutes on Saturday, according to the Japanese defense ministry.

Two J-15 jets then did the same for 80 minutes on Sunday.

"During these long periods, the jets flew unusually close to the P-3C, and they flew within 45 meters" of the patrol plane on both days, an official from the Japanese ministry told AFP.

Also on Sunday, Chinese jets cut across airspace around 900 meters (3,000 feet) ahead of a P-3C Japanese patrol plane at the same altitude -- a distance a P-3C can reach within a few seconds at cruising speed, Tokyo said.

"We do not believe that this approach was made by mistake," the Japanese military's chief of staff Yoshihide Yoshida told reporters on Thursday.

"Given it happened for 40 minutes and 80 minutes, for two days in a row, our understanding is that it was done on purpose," he said.

Beijing's foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian hit back at the Japanese description of the events.

"The root cause of the risk to maritime and air security was the close reconnaissance of China's normal military activities by a Japanese warplane," he said.

"The Chinese side urges the Japanese side to stop this kind of dangerous behavior."

'Abnormal approaches'

The incident followed the sighting in recent days of two Chinese aircraft carriers sailing in the Pacific simultaneously for the first time.

Japan said this week the aircraft carriers' activity -- described by China as "routine training" -- showed the expanding geographic scope of Beijing's military.

Yoshida said on Thursday loosening Japan's surveillance, information-gathering or countermeasures against intrusion "would encourage attempts to change the status quo by force".

Tokyo's top government spokesman Yoshimasa Hayashi earlier told reporters in regard to the fighter jet incident that "such abnormal approaches can lead to an accidental collision, so we have expressed serious concerns" to the Chinese side.

US ambassador to Japan George Glass said on social media platform X that the maneuvers by a Chinese fighter "put Japanese crewmembers' lives in peril".

"Whether it's harassing Philippine ships, attacking Vietnamese fishermen, or firing flares at Australian aircraft, Beijing knows only reckless aggression. Not so much a charm offensive as offensive harm," Glass said.

Similar incidents were last reported in May and June 2014, when Chinese Su-27 fighter jets flew within 30 meters (100 feet) of Japanese military planes in the East China Sea.

Japan summoned the Chinese ambassador at the time, while the two sides traded accusations of blame.

Daisuke Kawai, director of the University of Tokyo's economic security and policy innovation program, told AFP this week that the timing of the aircraft carrier movements could be linked to US-China economic tensions.

"Beijing calculated that the United States would be less willing or able to respond militarily at this precise moment, seeing it as an opportune time to demonstrate its expanding military capabilities," he said.