Jeff Probst a Constant for ‘Survivor’ as It Nears 44th Game

This image released by CBS shows Jeff Probst in the premiere episode of the 44th season of the reality competition series "Survivor," airing March 1. (CBS via AP)
This image released by CBS shows Jeff Probst in the premiere episode of the 44th season of the reality competition series "Survivor," airing March 1. (CBS via AP)
TT

Jeff Probst a Constant for ‘Survivor’ as It Nears 44th Game

This image released by CBS shows Jeff Probst in the premiere episode of the 44th season of the reality competition series "Survivor," airing March 1. (CBS via AP)
This image released by CBS shows Jeff Probst in the premiere episode of the 44th season of the reality competition series "Survivor," airing March 1. (CBS via AP)

There was a time Jeff Probst could not imagine doing what he will on Wednesday, being on hand as host for the start of a 44th season of “Survivor.”

That’s not simply because of the transitory nature of television, where a 44th season of anything is a rarity, even a program that created a sensation when it first aired on CBS in the summer of 2000.

In those early days, there was a restlessness about Probst. He’d studied screenwriting, acted and wrote and directed a well-received indie film in 2001. He tried a short-lived talk show. He admits “I had a chip on my shoulder about being called a ‘host.’”

Yet as series creator Mark Burnett began stepping away, Probst added “producer” to his title and has since ascended to the level of “showrunner” — industry lingo that means he’s in charge of everything.

At age 61, he’s all in, an evangelist for “Survivor.”

“I have never been so excited to be part of the show,” he told The Associated Press in a recent interview. “I hope it’s apparent. I hope it’s clear that I’m really into ‘Survivor.’”

It remains a marvelously-designed game, one that tests survival skills in a forbidding — if lovely — environment along with the social and scheming skills to remain standing at the end to collect the $1 million prize. Even if one cast is a drag, “one of the show’s greatest strengths is that every season hits a reset button,” said Dalton Ross, executive editor at large at Entertainment Weekly and a veteran chronicler of the show.

So it can, um, survive a scandal like a player being kicked off in 2019 after being accused of inappropriately touching young women or tweaks that don’t work, like the “fire tokens” that were introduced and abandoned after one season.

Other new ideas, like a hidden immunity idol or the “David vs Goliath” season that Probst really loved, freshen the show as it adheres to a basic structure.

Producers were also ordered by CBS to increase diversity, which Probst said has added to the show’s richness. The 18 castaways for the new season include five Black contestants, three Latinos and an Asian American.

“People that don’t watch ‘Survivor,’ I think they may mistake it for some sort of survivalist’s show or they label it with this idea that it’s just a reality show,” Probst said. “When, really, ‘Survivor’ is one of the biggest adventures you can ever go on, either as a player or a viewer.”

As Probst became more involved in how the show was put together, there was a clear difference in how he did his job onscreen, Ross said.

“Jeff started to put more opinion and personality into his hosting,” he said. “Up to that point, it was more of a master of ceremonies role. You realized he could be the eyes and ears of the audience and can speak for the audience. It was one of the most important changes he made as a host. It made him an element in the game that the players had to contend with.”

“Survivor” has settled on Fiji as a permanent set after bouncing around for several years to different locations. The jungle is a character in itself. High-definition photography and drones makes things more visually appealing than ever, Ross said.

Probst demurs when asked his opinion of the best player ever, and admits some of the seasons start to run together. He’d lose a “Survivor” trivia contest, he said.

“I will see an early cut of an episode, and I can’t remember who was voted out, even though I was the one at Tribal Council who snuffed out their torch,” he said.

And, yes, he’s excited about the new season, calling it one of the most entertaining groups of players the show has put together in a while.

“It’s intoxicating,” he said. “I honestly believe one of the reasons we’re still on the air is that it’s compelling. If people watch the first episode of ‘Survivor’ 44,’ I don’t know how you’re not going to watch the second episode. You’re going to be hooked.”

Starting Wednesday, Probst will host a podcast with show producer Brittany Crapper and fan Jay Wolff that will air after the conclusion of each episode. “On Fire with Jeff Probst” will an insider’s look at how the show is put together, he said.

CBS doesn’t want to spoil the magic, but deepen the relationship with fans, he said.

With broadcast television struggling for viewers, “Survivor” is a dependable performer for CBS and is one of those rare family shows that people of all ages can enjoy. The show seems destined to be around for awhile and hard to imagine without the man who’s “not just the face of ‘Survivor’ but the pulse of ‘Survivor’ as well,” Ross said.

Asked if he would want to stay with the show as long as it’s on the air, Probst at first calls the question impossible.

Then he quickly answers.

“At this point, yes,” he said. “Really, yes. Because I’ve built my life around ‘Survivor’ and I’ve fashioned all of my creative ideas through ‘Survivor.’ Every single conversation, book I read, podcast I listen to, every single thing ... will get filtered through my ‘Survivor’ filter.”



Movie Review: A Gripping Deep-Sea Rescue Mission in ‘Last Breath’ with Woody Harrelson, Simu LIU 

Simu Liu, from left, Finn Cole, Woody Harrelson, and Alex Parkinson attend the premiere of Focus Features' "Last Breath" at AMC Lincoln Square on Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2025, in New York. (AP)
Simu Liu, from left, Finn Cole, Woody Harrelson, and Alex Parkinson attend the premiere of Focus Features' "Last Breath" at AMC Lincoln Square on Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2025, in New York. (AP)
TT

Movie Review: A Gripping Deep-Sea Rescue Mission in ‘Last Breath’ with Woody Harrelson, Simu LIU 

Simu Liu, from left, Finn Cole, Woody Harrelson, and Alex Parkinson attend the premiere of Focus Features' "Last Breath" at AMC Lincoln Square on Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2025, in New York. (AP)
Simu Liu, from left, Finn Cole, Woody Harrelson, and Alex Parkinson attend the premiere of Focus Features' "Last Breath" at AMC Lincoln Square on Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2025, in New York. (AP)

A routine deep-sea diving mission in the North Sea goes terribly wrong when a young diver is stranded some 300 feet below the surface in the new film "Last Breath." His umbilical cable has severed. The support vessel above is aimlessly drifting away from the site through violent, stormy waters. And the diver has only ten minutes of oxygen in his backup tank.

As if that wasn't enough, it's also a true story.

If merely reading this is giving you heart palpitations already, you can only imagine the white-knuckle experience of watching this all play out on the big screen. It's 40ish minutes of pure suspense and anxiety as the story shuffles between the man at the bottom of the ocean, Chris Lemons (Finn Cole), his fellow saturation divers (Woody Harrelson as Duncan and Simu Liu as Dave) in the diving bell below the waters who are unable to help and the crew in the support vessel above (including Cliff Curtis and Mark Bonnar) scrambling to get their systems back online and operational as the clock rapidly runs out. Ten minutes has never felt so short — and then it just gets worse as the clock starts counting up, showing Chris's time without oxygen.

At one point, Liu's character Dave, a no-nonsense, all-business diver says matter-of-factly that it's a body recovery, not a rescue. Deep-sea saturation diving is a dangerous business, described at the start of the film as the most dangerous job on earth. Chris tells his fiancé, in a short introduction, that it's no more dangerous than going to space. She replies that it's funny that he thinks that is comforting.

The real incident happened in September 2012 — Dave, Duncan and Chris were just one team of divers sent to the ocean floor off the coast of Aberdeen, Scotland, to repair an oil pipeline.

The seas were particularly rough that day, with winds up to 35 knots, common for the North Sea but also not what one might call safe. Chris and Dave were in the middle of their work when they heard the urgent calls to abort: The dynamic positioning system in the support vessel above had failed and they were in drift.

Chris scrambled to maneuver out of the pipeline corridors, but his umbilical got caught. For a brief, awful moment he's the anchor to the ship above, but soon enough the cord snapped, and he was thrown back to the ocean floor in pitch black with no coms, no heat and very little hope for survival. News articles about the incident clock his backup oxygen supply as being closer to five or six minutes – perhaps the movie wanted to give the audience a little buffer.

If this sounds at all familiar, it may be because it was made into a documentary, also called "Last Breath" and released in 2019. While it was well-received, some true stories are just too gripping to exist solely in that form. It's not exactly a surprise that a narrative film was made as well. There's a good track record of recent complimentary adaptations — think Ron Howard's "13 Lives" and "The Rescue" about the Thai boys soccer team stuck in the cave.

This one was made by Alex Parkinson, the same director who co-directed the doc, and it's a well-executed narrative interpretation that doesn't get in its own way with padding. Harrelson gets to be the wise mentor who really doesn't want to lose someone on his last mission. Liu gets to flex his action muscles (literally and figuratively) in a modest but solid role. And they don't go out of their way to shoehorn in a villain — this is just a group of people trying their best to save a life.

The only real problem, if one can even call it that, is that it's so short. The film doesn't take liberties with stretching out the timeline much at all and after 93 minutes, the whole thing is over. It feels strange to want a movie to be longer, but in the case of "Last Breath" I was both desperate for it to end, for anxiety reasons, and also wanting more.