US Lawmakers Urge EU to Declare IRGC a Terrorist Organization

US Congress (AFP)
US Congress (AFP)
TT
20

US Lawmakers Urge EU to Declare IRGC a Terrorist Organization

US Congress (AFP)
US Congress (AFP)

A bipartisan group of 130 lawmakers urged the European Union foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, to designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization.

In their letter to Borrell, the lawmakers urged the European official to resolve the issue urgently, noting that the IRGC had "freely and openly carried out plots targeting citizens in countries across the EU.

The representatives, led by Kathy Manning, Bill Keating, and Thomas Kean, added that Iran is a leading state sponsor of terror, and the IRGC has supported and participated in human rights abuses and terrorist activities.

The letter is based on a study by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, which showed that Iran "instigated more than 33 plots to surveil, abduct, or assassinate citizens in Europe."

The lawmakers responded to Borrell's statement that the inclusion of the Revolutionary Guards on terrorist lists must take place through the courts, despite the European Parliament's vote in favor of it.

"We understand the legal complexities involved in designating the IRCS as a terrorist organization pursuant to EU law," the letter read, adding that they "fully appreciated the need for this decision to be adjudicated by either a judicial or equivalent competent authority. But given the growing threat that Iran poses to EU countries and their citizens, we urge you to treat this issue with the utmost urgency."

Last January, the European Parliament voted in favor of an amendment to a law that would approve including the IRGC in the terror list.

Borrell said it was "something that cannot be decided without a court. A court decision is needed first. You cannot say: "I consider you a terrorist because I do not like you"."

It is not the first time that Congress has criticized the European Union's "reluctance" to include the Guards on terrorist lists, as Republican senators previously considered that this hesitation would threaten efforts to confront Iran and Russia.

In a previous letter to Borrell last month, they said: "We write to express our disappointment in the European Union's (EU) hesitation to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of Iran as an addition to the EU Terror List."

"Amidst the IRGC's ongoing support of Russian war crimes in Ukraine, EU reluctance both weakens our collective resolve against Russia and ignores the Iranian government's goal of sowing terror in the West."

The Senators, led by the senior Republican in the Foreign Relations Committee, Jim Risch, referred to the European Parliament resolution identifying Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism.

The growing alignment of Russian and Iranian activities, including using Iranian drones in Ukraine, complicates the IRGC in Russia's terror. An IRGC terror designation will sharpen and align the US and EU responses to Russian aggression.

In 2019, the US put the Revolutionary Guards on the terrorist list, a year after former US President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from the nuclear agreement with Tehran and to adopt a policy of maximum pressure by imposing sanctions.

Iran stipulated the removal of the IRGC from the terrorist list after the nuclear negotiations faltered in March last year, but it retracted this condition after the Biden administration pledged to meet Tehran's demand to reduce regional tension.

The EU adopted a policy of imposing sanctions on Iran in January because of its support for Russia in its war against Ukraine, but without including the IRGC on its list of terrorist organizations.

IRGC commanders warned the EU against placing the organization on its terrorist list.



NATO Needs More Long-range Missiles to Deter Russia, US General Says

An explosion of a drone lights up the sky over the city during a Russian drone and missile strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Gleb Garanich/File Photo
An explosion of a drone lights up the sky over the city during a Russian drone and missile strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Gleb Garanich/File Photo
TT
20

NATO Needs More Long-range Missiles to Deter Russia, US General Says

An explosion of a drone lights up the sky over the city during a Russian drone and missile strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Gleb Garanich/File Photo
An explosion of a drone lights up the sky over the city during a Russian drone and missile strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Gleb Garanich/File Photo

NATO will need more long-range missiles in its arsenal to deter Russia from attacking Europe because Moscow is expected to increase production of long-range weapons, a US Army general told Reuters.

Russia's effective use of long-range missiles in its war in Ukraine has convinced Western military officials of their importance for destroying command posts, transportation hubs and missile launchers far behind enemy lines.

"The Russian army is bigger today than it was when they started the war in Ukraine," Major General John Rafferty said in an interview at a US military base in Wiesbaden, Germany.

"And we know that they're going to continue to invest in long-range rockets and missiles and sophisticated air defences. So more alliance capability is really, really important."

The war in Ukraine has underscored Europe's heavy dependence on the United States to provide long-range missiles, with Kyiv seeking to strengthen its air defences.

Rafferty recently completed an assignment as commander of the US Army's 56th Artillery Command in the German town of Mainz-Kastel, which is preparing for temporary deployments of long-range US missiles on European soil from 2026.

At a meeting with US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Monday, German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius is expected to try to clarify whether such deployments, agreed between Berlin and Washington when Joe Biden was president, will go ahead now that Donald Trump is back in the White House.

The agreement foresaw the deployment of systems including Tomahawk missiles with a range of 1,800 km and the developmental hypersonic weapon Dark Eagle with a range of around 3,000 km.

Russia has criticised the planned deployment of longer-range US missiles in Germany as a serious threat to its national security. It has dismissed NATO concerns that it could attack an alliance member and cited concerns about NATO expansion as one of its reasons for invading Ukraine in 2022.

EUROPEAN PLANS

Fabian Hoffmann, a doctoral research fellow at Oslo University who specialises in missiles, estimated that the US provides some 90% of NATO's long-range missile capabilities.

"Long-range strike capabilities are crucial in modern warfare," he said. "You really, really don't want to be caught in a position like Ukraine (without such weapons) in the first year (of the war). That puts you at an immediate disadvantage."

Aware of this vulnerability, European countries in NATO have agreed to increase defence spending under pressure from Trump.

Some European countries have their own long-range missiles but their number and range are limited. US missiles can strike targets at a distance of several thousand km.

Europe's air-launched cruise missiles, such as the British Storm Shadow, the French Scalp and the German Taurus, have a range of several hundred km. France's sea-launched Missile de Croisiere Naval (MdCN) can travel more than 1,000 km.

They are all built by European arms maker MBDA which has branches in Britain, France, Germany and Italy.

France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain and Sweden are now participating in a programme to acquire long-range, ground-launched conventional missiles known as the European Long-Range Strike Approach (ELSA).

As part of the program, Britain and Germany announced in mid-May that they would start work on the development of a missile with a range of over 2,000 km.