N. Korea Says It Tested New Solid-Fuel Long-Range Missile

This picture taken on April 13, 2023 and released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on April 14 shows the test-fire of the new Hwasongpho-18 ICBM at an undisclosed location in North Korea. (AFP /KCNA via KNS)
This picture taken on April 13, 2023 and released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on April 14 shows the test-fire of the new Hwasongpho-18 ICBM at an undisclosed location in North Korea. (AFP /KCNA via KNS)
TT

N. Korea Says It Tested New Solid-Fuel Long-Range Missile

This picture taken on April 13, 2023 and released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on April 14 shows the test-fire of the new Hwasongpho-18 ICBM at an undisclosed location in North Korea. (AFP /KCNA via KNS)
This picture taken on April 13, 2023 and released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on April 14 shows the test-fire of the new Hwasongpho-18 ICBM at an undisclosed location in North Korea. (AFP /KCNA via KNS)

North Korea said Friday it flight-tested a solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile for the first time, a possible breakthrough in its efforts to acquire a more powerful, harder-to-detect weapon targeting the continental United States.

North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency issued the report a day after the country’s neighbors detected a launch of a long-range missile from near Pyongyang, which extended a run of weapons displays involving more than 100 missiles fired into the sea since the start of 2022.

Thursday’s test did not appear to demonstrate the weapon's full capacity, and it remains unclear how far North Korea has come in mastering technologies to ensure the warhead would withstand atmospheric reentry and accurately strike targets. Still, analysts said the test was likely a meaningful advance in North Korea's goal to build a nuclear arsenal that could directly threaten the United States.

KCNA said the launch was supervised on site by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, who described the missile — named Hwasong-18 — as the most powerful weapon of his nuclear forces that would enhance counterattack abilities in the face of external threats created by the military activities of the United States and its regional allies.

Kim pledged to further expand his nuclear arsenal to “constantly strike extreme uneasiness and horror” in his rivals and make them feel regret for their wrong choices.

North Korea has justified its weapons demonstrations as a response to the expanding military exercises between the United States and South Korea, which the North condemns as invasion rehearsals while using them as a pretext to push further its own weapons development.

Kim added that the Hwasong-18 would rapidly advance North Korea’s nuclear response posture and further support an aggressive military strategy that vows to maintain “frontal confrontation” against its rivals.

North Korea has tested various intercontinental missiles since 2017 that demonstrated the potential range to reach the US mainland, but the others use liquid fuel that must be added relatively close to the launch and they cannot remain fueled for prolonged periods.

An ICBM with built-in solid propellants would be easier to move and hide and fired quickly, reducing the opportunities for opponents to detect and counter the launch. It’s not immediately clear how close the North is to having a functional solid-fuel ICBM capable of striking the US mainland.

South Korea’s Defense Ministry in a statement described Hwasong-18's flight as a “mid-phase test” and said North Korea would need more time and effort to complete the system. It maintains that North Korea’s technologies haven’t reached the point where it can protect its ICBM warheads from the harsh conditions of atmospheric reentry.

Last month, South Korean Defense Minister Lee Jong-Sup also told lawmakers that North Korea likely hasn’t yet acquired the technology to place nuclear warheads on its newer short-range missiles targeting South Korea, though he acknowledged the country was making considerable progress on it.

Still, Thursday’s test marked a “significant breakthrough for the North Koreans, but not an unexpected one,” said Ankit Panda, an expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

“The primary significance of solid-fuel ICBMs is in terms of what they’ll do for the survivability of North Korea’s overall ICBM force,” he said.

“Because these missiles are fueled at the time of manufacture and are thus ready to use as needed, they will be much more rapidly useable in a crisis or conflict, depriving South Korea and the United States of valuable time that could be useful to preemptively hunt and destroy such missiles.”

North Korean state media published photos of the missile blasting off from a launch vehicle at a test site inside a forest as Kim watched from an observation post along with military officials and his daughter.

KCNA described the Hwasong-18 as a three-stage missile with the first stage tested at a standard ballistic trajectory and the others programmed to fly at higher angles after separation to avoid North Korea’s neighbors. It wasn’t immediately clear how the third stage was tested, where the warhead would theoretically be placed.

The agency said the first and second stages fell into waters off the country’s eastern coast. The official Rodong Sinmun newspaper published an aerial photo of an object it described as the third stage following separation, but state media provided no further details.

Kim Dong-yub, a professor at the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul, said North Korea for the test likely designed the third stage as an empty device and simply let it fall after separation.

He noted that North Korea didn’t release details about how high the missile went, which suggests it wasn’t tested at the weapon’s full capacity and range, and said the North likely will test the system several more times.

Soo Kim, an expert with Virginia-based consultancy LMI and a former CIA analyst, said each successive test by North Korea “seems to demonstrate greater options for the regime to provoke and threaten the region.”

“With the Day of the Sun festivities coming up, and a US-South Korean summit around the corner, the timing is also ripe for a North Korean provocation for (Kim Jong Un) to yet again remind us that his weapons are getting bigger, better, and all the more challenging for the US, South Korea, and the international community to deal with,” she said.

She was referring to the birth anniversary of Kim’s state-founding grandfather, Kim Il Sung, which falls on Saturday, and a planned summit in Washington this month between President Joe Biden and South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Solid-fuel ICBMs highlighted an extensive wish list Kim announced under a five-year arms development plan in 2021, which also included tactical nuclear weapons, hypersonic missiles, nuclear-powered submarines and spy satellites.

The North has fired around 30 missiles this year alone over 12 different launch events as both the pace of its weapons development and the US-South Korean military exercises increase in a cycle of tit-for-tat. The US and South Korean militaries conducted their biggest field exercises in years last month and separately held joint naval and air force drills involving a US aircraft carrier strike group and nuclear-capable US bombers.

North Korea claimed the drills simulated an all-out war against North Korea and communicated threats against it. The United States and South Korea have said their exercises are defensive in nature and expanding them was necessary to cope with the North’s evolving threats.



South Korea, Iran FMs Discuss Hormuz in Call

Members of the CandleAct union carry placards and shout slogans during a rally near the US embassy in Seoul, South Korea, 10 September 2026. Protesters gathered to oppose a potential deployment of South Korean troops to the Strait of Hormuz.  EPA/JEON HEON-KYUN
Members of the CandleAct union carry placards and shout slogans during a rally near the US embassy in Seoul, South Korea, 10 September 2026. Protesters gathered to oppose a potential deployment of South Korean troops to the Strait of Hormuz. EPA/JEON HEON-KYUN
TT

South Korea, Iran FMs Discuss Hormuz in Call

Members of the CandleAct union carry placards and shout slogans during a rally near the US embassy in Seoul, South Korea, 10 September 2026. Protesters gathered to oppose a potential deployment of South Korean troops to the Strait of Hormuz.  EPA/JEON HEON-KYUN
Members of the CandleAct union carry placards and shout slogans during a rally near the US embassy in Seoul, South Korea, 10 September 2026. Protesters gathered to oppose a potential deployment of South Korean troops to the Strait of Hormuz. EPA/JEON HEON-KYUN

The foreign ministers of South Korea and Iran discussed the Strait of Hormuz in a phone call on Friday, Seoul said, days after confirming it was weighing a "contribution" to the waterway's security.

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly pressured ally South Korea to provide help for the war in the Middle East, saying Seoul rejected his request for assistance in securing the waterway that is crucial to global oil supplies.

South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun spoke by phone with his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi at Tehran's request, "discussing the recent situation in the Middle East", and the Strait of Hormuz, the foreign ministry in Seoul said in a statement.

The Friday announcement followed a warning from Tehran earlier this week that any South Korean military contribution to the conflict would have "serious consequences".

South Korea sent a fact-finding team to assess the situation in the strait and has repeatedly said it has not decided whether to deploy its military to Hormuz.

Traffic through the vital shipping route has been virtually paralyzed since the US-Iran war began on February 28, disrupting global energy markets.

Negotiations between Iran and the United States have stalled as they vied for control over Hormuz, which normally carries around a fifth of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas exports.


IAEA Confirms Activity at Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flag flies during a special session of an IAEA Board of Governors meeting in Vienna, Austria, March 2, 2026. (AP)
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flag flies during a special session of an IAEA Board of Governors meeting in Vienna, Austria, March 2, 2026. (AP)
TT

IAEA Confirms Activity at Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flag flies during a special session of an IAEA Board of Governors meeting in Vienna, Austria, March 2, 2026. (AP)
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flag flies during a special session of an IAEA Board of Governors meeting in Vienna, Austria, March 2, 2026. (AP)

The United Nations atomic watchdog said on Thursday it has observed construction activity at Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain, a heavily-fortified site suspected of housing nuclear-related activities.

International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi said new movement at the complex had been spotted in remote imagery.

“There are some indications that there is movement around this construction site,” Grossi told Bloomberg Television.

“We don’t have any concrete information as to activities that may be taking place there,” he added.

Pickaxe Mountain, located in the Zagros Mountains roughly 220 kilometers south of Tehran, began drawing particular attention after an Iranian centrifuge workshop was sabotaged six years ago.

Iran said it intended to move sensitive nuclear-related infrastructure underground to protect it from attack.

“They said at the time, ‘we are going to put everything in tunnels, inside a mountain,’” Grossi told Bloomberg. “This was going to be impermeable and protected from attacks.”

Western intelligence suspects Iran is building an undeclared enrichment facility inside Pickaxe Mountain that could be used to enrich uranium.

On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump mentioned the Pickaxe at a Republican rally and said: “We notice there’s a little activity at Pickaxe. I would advise Iran not to get cute because we will have to hit them very hard.”

Trump has been threatening strikes on Pickaxe Mountain since at least mid-July.

Unverified nuclear stockpile

At the quarterly meeting of the IAEA board of governors in Vienna this week, Grossi said the UN watchdog has been completely blind regarding Iran's nuclear program since at least June 2025, when the US and Israel launched a 12-day conflict that included strikes on nuclear sites.

Prior to the June strikes, the IAEA calculated that Iran possessed approximately 440,9 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, which is close to the 90% needed to make a bomb and well above the 3.67% limit set by a 2015 now-defunct agreement with Iran.

On Wednesday, the UN atomic watchdog’s board reported Iran to the UN Security Council for the first time in 20 years, citing it for failure to cooperate in a long-running investigation into uranium traces detected by inspectors at undeclared sites.

The resolution accused Iran of failing to comply with its nuclear reporting obligations, citing it for failure to cooperate in a long-running investigation into uranium traces detected by inspectors at undeclared sites.

Tehran responds

In return, Iranian deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi slammed the IAEA for referring Iran's nuclear file to the UN Security Council.

Gharibabadi wrote in a post on X, “They attack Iran's safeguarded nuclear facilities, disrupt the normal process of verification, and then use that very disruption as a pretext to issue a resolution.”

He described the approach as “fabricated”, saying: “With these fabrications, you cannot make up for the failure of your policies and actions, nor achieve any result at the Security Council.”

Iran’s mission to the UN also denounced the resolution. “It follows a telling trend and facilitates further erosion and ultimate collapse of the proliferation regime as a whole,” the mission said in a post on X.

The resolution sparked criticism in Tehran. Politicians said Iran should accelerate the development of the nuclear program and reconsider its membership in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Iranian deputy Rouhollah Najabat said that following the IAEA Board of Governors’ resolution, Tehran will accelerate the technical development of its nuclear program.

“Westerners should know that the path of threats and referring the case to the Security Council is ineffective,” Najabat said.

He added that Iran will make no concessions but will take a “more serious and firm” approach.

The deputy warned that the Iranian parliament will not remain “passive.”

Lawmaker Alireza Salimi, a member of parliament’s presiding board, said Iran had “serious options” for responding. “One of our options could be withdrawal from the NPT,” he said, adding: “Iran will certainly respond.”


Hormuz Shipping Traffic Falls to Single Digits

FILE PHOTO: Vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, September 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, September 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo
TT

Hormuz Shipping Traffic Falls to Single Digits

FILE PHOTO: Vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, September 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, September 2, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo

Vessel transits at the Strait of Hormuz fell to seven on Thursday from 11 the previous day, preliminary ship-tracking data showed on Friday, well below the 10-day average of 15.

Of the seven vessels, two Panamax ships exited the strait, one carrying fertilizer and the other sailing in ballast, according to data from ship tracker Kpler as of 0306 GMT.

Five vessels entered the strait, including a Panamax vessel carrying dry bulk cargo, a Handysize vessel laden with steel, a Handysize vessel carrying grains, a medium-range tanker loaded with dirty petroleum products, and a Supramax vessel carrying dry bulk cargo.

The ⁠figures exclude any ⁠vessels that might have crossed the strait with their Automatic Identification System transponders turned off to avoid detection.

Meanwhile, two ballast QatarEnergy-linked vessels, the Al Ghashamiya and the Al Daayen, appeared inside the Strait of Hormuz this week on September 9 and 6, respectively, after last being seen outside the waterway on September 6 and ⁠3.

Another QatarEnergy-controlled vessel, Al Marrouna, also exited the Strait of Hormuz this week, delivering a cargo from Ras Laffan to Pakistan on September 10. The voyage marked the first known LNG shipment aboard a Qatar-linked tanker since late July, when Al Areesh carried a cargo from Ras Laffan also to Pakistan.

Before the Iran war started on February 28, the strait typically handled about 125 large, commercial vessels per day, including tankers, gas carriers, bulkers and ⁠container vessels, accounting ⁠for some 20% of the world’s daily crude oil and liquefied natural gas supply.

A US blockade of Iran-related shipping has halted Iranian crude oil exports since it was reimposed in mid-July.