عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News
Interviews

Iraqi FM: Iran Can't Strike Israel, Yet Targets Friendly Ally

Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein
Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein
TT
TT

Iraqi FM: Iran Can't Strike Israel, Yet Targets Friendly Ally

Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein
Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein

Hours before Iraq lodged a complaint against Iran at the UN Security Council, Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein criticized Iran’s attack on Erbil, calling it an “attempt to export its internal problems.”
Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Hussein stated that Iraq has taken political and diplomatic steps in response to Iran’s attack in Erbil, denying Tehran’s claims about Israeli intelligence on Iraqi soil.
Tehran’s assault had killed four civilians in Erbil on Monday.
Hussein linked the attack on Iraqi Kurdistan to rising tensions between Iran and Israel due to the Gaza conflict, suggesting clashes between Iranians and Israelis.
When asked about additional measures Iraq is considering in response to the targeting of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard in the Kurdistan region of Iraq, Hussein said: “Iraq is responding to Iran’s aggression with diplomatic, political, and legal measures.”
“We've summoned the second-in-command at the Iranian embassy, delivering a protest note about the attack in Erbil and the loss of Iraqi lives.”
“We've asked our ambassador in Tehran to return, and a joint investigation committee has been formed at the directive of the Prime Minister, set to report its findings on Wednesday.”
“Apart from these steps, we've filed a complaint with the UN Security Council.”

As for Iran's claim about targeting an Israeli Mossad headquarters in Erbil, Hussein affirmed that there’s no evidence of Israeli intelligence on Iraqi soil.
“The Iranians are deflecting internal issues onto others. Similar false accusations were made a year ago when Iran targeted a residential house, falsely claiming it was a Mossad base,” he said.
Noting that Iran seems unable to confront Israel directly, Hussein pointed to Tehran choosing to target Erbil instead.
The top Iraqi diplomat also mentioned that even with Iranian presence in Syria and on the Israeli border, Tehran appears unwilling to directly confront Israel.
Regarding the motive behind attacking Erbil, Hussein said that the whole assault is perplexing since Erbil is part of Iraq, a neighboring and friendly nation with strong historical, geographical, religious, cultural, and economic ties to Iran.
“In the past, Iraq supported Iran diplomatically, working to improve its relations with Arab and European countries and the US,” reminded Hussein.
“Now, Iran's attack on Iraq, its ally, is a strategic mistake that will likely be realized over time,” he added.
“It seems there are understood rules of engagement between Israelis and Iranians,” highlighted Hussein.
“The attack on Erbil might be viewed by some in Tehran as a response to the Kerman terrorist incident claimed by ISIS Khorasan.”
“Iran claims to fight Israelis, suggesting there are rules of engagement, but for domestic reasons, Iranians targeted the militarily weaker link, Iraq, their friend, rather than confronting their enemy directly,” noted Hussein.
In relation to the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq, Hussein mentioned that Iraq aims for a negotiation process with the US, noting Washington’s readiness for talks under normal circumstances.
“The Iraqi government insists on resolving the issue through talks, not force,” he affirmed, adding that Iraq is in ongoing discussions with the US about starting these negotiations.
“Despite recent violence, the Americans are open to discussing their presence in Iraq under normal conditions,” asserted the minister.
“We invited them in the past, and we can now ask them to leave, but it should be a mutual decision,” he explained, noting that Iraq is working towards an agreement to kickstart negotiations.
Recent weeks saw increased hostilities against US interests in Iraq, leading to Washington targeting Iraqi factions with ties to Iran.
On Iraq-Saudi relations, Hussein mentioned they are in excellent shape, expressing Iraq’s desire to boost economic cooperation and encourage Saudi investment in the country.
“Iraq and Saudi Arabia currently enjoy excellent political relations,” said Hussein.
“We've played a key role in mending ties between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and this is something we're pleased about. Iran is a neighbor, and better relations between Arab countries and Iran benefit Iraq,” he added.
Hussein further explained that tensions in the region negatively affect Iraq, so positive relations are crucial.
“Our relationship with Saudi Arabia is exceptional,” he affirmed.
As for Baghdad and Riyadh working on ways to collaborate in trade and the economy, Hussein said: “We consistently work together on oil issues within OPEC, coordinate internationally, and engage within the Arab League.”
“Looking ahead, we aim to strengthen economic ties and attract Saudi investment in Iraq. Foreign investment is vital for building Iraq's economy,” said Hussein.

Most Viewed

 
 
Interviews

Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
TT
TT

Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich has told Asharq Al-Awsat that the US does not plan to withdraw its forces from Syria.

The US is committed to “the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with,” he said.

Here is the full text of the interview.

Question: Mr. Goldrich, thank you so much for taking the time to sit with us today. I know you are leaving your post soon. How do you assess the accomplishments and challenges remaining?

Answer: Thank you very much for the chance to talk with you today. I've been in this position for three years, and so at the end of three years, I can see that there's a lot that we accomplished and a lot that we have left to do. But at the beginning of a time I was here, we had just completed a review of our Syria policy, and we saw that we needed to focus on reducing suffering for the people in Syria. We needed to reduce violence. We needed to hold the regime accountable for things that are done and most importantly, from the US perspective, we needed to keep ISIS from reemerging as a threat to our country and to other countries. At the same time, we also realized that there wouldn't be a solution to the crisis until there was a political process under resolution 2254, so in each of these areas, we've seen both progress and challenges, but of course, on ISIS, we have prevented the reemergence of the threat from northeast Syria, and we've helped deal with people that needed to be repatriated out of the prisons, and we dealt with displaced people in al-Hol to reduce the numbers there. We helped provide for stabilization in those parts of Syria.

Question: I want to talk a little bit about the ISIS situation now that the US troops are still there, do you envision a timeline where they will be withdrawn? Because there were some reports in the press that there is a plan from the Biden administration to withdraw.

Answer: Yeah. So right now, our focus is on the mission that we have there to keep ISIS from reemerging. So I know there have been reports, but I want to make clear that we remain committed to the role that we play in that part of Syria, to the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with, and to the need to prevent that threat from reemerging.

Question: So you can assure people who are saying that you might withdraw, that you are remaining for the time being?

Answer: Yes, and that we remain committed to this mission which needs to continue to be pursued.

Question: You also mentioned the importance of humanitarian aid. The US has been leading on this. Are you satisfied with where you are today on the humanitarian front in Syria?

Answer: We remain committed to the role that we play to provide for humanitarian assistance in Syria. Of the money that was pledged in Brussels, we pledged $593 million just this past spring, and we overall, since the beginning of the conflict, have provided $18 billion both to help the Syrians who are inside of Syria and to help the refugees who are in surrounding countries. And so we remain committed to providing that assistance, and we remain keenly aware that 90% of Syrians are living in poverty right now, and that there's been suffering there. We're doing everything we can to reduce the suffering, but I think where we would really like to be is where there's a larger solution to the whole crisis, so Syrian people someday will be able to provide again for themselves and not need this assistance.

Question: And that's a perfect key to my next question. Solution in Syria. you are aware that the countries in the region are opening up to Assad again, and you also have the EU signaling overture to the Syrian regime and Assad. How do you deal with that?

Answer: For the United States, our policy continues to be that we will not normalize with the regime in Syria until there's been authentic and enduring progress on the goals of resolution 2254, until the human rights of the Syrian people are respected and until they have the civil and human rights that they deserve. We know other countries have engaged with the regime. When those engagements happen, we don't support them, but we remind the countries that are engaged that they should be using their engagements to push forward on the shared international goals under 2254, and that whatever it is that they're doing should be for the sake of improving the situation of the Syrian people.

Question: Let's say that all of the countries decided to talk to Assad, aren’t you worried that the US will be alienated in the process?

Answer: The US will remain true to our own principles and our own policies and our own laws, and the path for the regime in Syria to change its relationship with us is very clear, if they change the behaviors that led to the laws that we have and to the policies that we have, if those behaviors change and the circumstances inside of Syria change, then it's possible to have a different kind of relationship, but that's where it has to start.

Question: My last question to you before you leave, if you have to pick one thing that you need to do in Syria today, what is it that you would like to see happening today?

Answer: So there are a number of things, I think that will always be left and that there are things that we will try to do, to try to make them happen. We want to hold people accountable in Syria for things that have happened. So even today, we observed something called the International Day for victims of enforced disappearances, there are people that are missing, and we're trying to draw attention to the need to account for the missing people. So our step today was to sanction a number of officials who were responsible for enforced disappearances, but we also created something called the independent institution for missing persons, and that helps the families, in the non-political way, get information on what's happened. So I'd like to see some peace for the families of the missing people. I'd like to see the beginning of a political process, there hasn't been a meeting of the constitutional committee in two years, and I think that's because the regime has not been cooperating in political process steps. So we need to change that situation. And I would, of course, like it's important to see the continuation of the things that we were talking about, so keeping ISIS from reemerging and maintaining assistance as necessary in the humanitarian sphere. So all these things, some of them are ongoing, and some of them remain to be achieved. But the Syrian people deserve all aspects of our policy to be fulfilled and for them to be able to return to a normal life.