AI Threatens 300 Million Jobs Globally

Participants at the Third Annual Congress for Arab Media Professionals, organized by the Arab States Broadcasting Union in Tunis. Asharq Al-Awsat
Participants at the Third Annual Congress for Arab Media Professionals, organized by the Arab States Broadcasting Union in Tunis. Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

AI Threatens 300 Million Jobs Globally

Participants at the Third Annual Congress for Arab Media Professionals, organized by the Arab States Broadcasting Union in Tunis. Asharq Al-Awsat
Participants at the Third Annual Congress for Arab Media Professionals, organized by the Arab States Broadcasting Union in Tunis. Asharq Al-Awsat

International media, communication, and new technologies experts have discussed the positive and negative effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the Arab media sector and the media in general, as well as on the global economy, during the Third Annual Congress for Arab Media Professionals, organized by the Arab States Broadcasting Union in Tunis.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, the President of the Arab States Broadcasting Union and the CEO of Saudi Broadcast Authority (SBA), Mohammed Fahad Al-Harthi, pointed to an increasing interest of media and communication officials in the effects of AI on media content and on the use of modern means of communication to address billions of people around the world.

Asked about the importance of the annual congress and the message it conveys about AI and its effects on the media, Al-Harithi said: “The interest of the Arab States Broadcasting Union in this phenomenon was imposed by global media, technological and communications developments... Artificial intelligence will not only change the media sector, but it will also impact many sectors in the Arab region and in the entire world.”

He revealed that a report issued by the World Bank predicts that 40 percent of jobs worldwide may disappear due to AI.

“There are also reports that estimate that about 300 million jobs will vanish soon due to applications of AI in many sectors, including media, communications, technologies, and services,” he added.

Regarding the consequences of AI on media and communication in particular, Al-Harthi emphasized that this sector was the most affected by rapid technological changes, especially by AI, because it depends more than others on the complete overlap between content creation, modern technologies, and the promotion of media products within many new and complex mechanisms and methods.

“We are in an era in which much of the media has begun to give in to AI mechanisms... We noticed this during our tours around the world, including to the international news agency, The Associated Press (AP), which produces about a third of its media and communication materials through advanced digital software, in which journalists and humans in general do not interfere... especially for some traditional media stories, such as the results of sports matches,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Al-Harthi continued: “This development undoubtedly poses many challenges to those responsible for media, communication, and influencing public opinion through very modern digital technological means, including the challenge of fake or fabricated news.”

He noted that the Arab States Broadcasting Union has opened important cases related to the misuse of AI, such as “violating privacy and personal data,” publishing “fake news,” and stealing and broadcasting news without respecting intellectual property rights and broadcasting rights.

Commenting on studies that prove successful AI practices in various media and communication sectors, Al-Harthi said: “We also have successful experiences, and AI as a whole is not a curse. Rather, it can also be a blessing for media professionals, students, researchers, and the public.”

However, he stressed that ensuring the accuracy of information requires, in many cases, serious human scrutiny and intervention by media professionals, experts, and researchers to verify the authenticity of the news and information, as well as conducting investigations into contradictory news and sources, and their cross-references.

“At the same time, there are those who consider the acceleration of the use of artificial intelligence to be a frightening development. Therefore, the concerned authorities in the United States held meetings with all those involved with the aim of rationalizing the benefit of AI mechanisms in accordance with directives that are consistent with the country’s constants and its highest national interests.”



Fakhri Karim: I Conveyed Talabani’s Advice to Assad on Terrorists

Fakhri Karim (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Fakhri Karim (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Fakhri Karim: I Conveyed Talabani’s Advice to Assad on Terrorists

Fakhri Karim (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Fakhri Karim (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The late Iraqi President, Jalal Talabani, excelled at delivering messages subtly. In private meetings, he spoke more freely than in public statements or interviews. His chief advisor, Fakhri Karim, often joined these discussions.

Luncheons were lavish, showing Talabani's respect for different opinions, though he rarely followed doctors’ advice.

Talabani believed that Iranian leaders were smart and hoped they wouldn’t try to control Baghdad from Tehran, citing the failed attempt to manage Beirut from Damascus.

He noted that Iraq’s independent spirit makes it hard for the country to follow the US, Iran, or Türkiye. Talabani also admitted giving refuge to 80 Iraqi officers who had fought against Iran, after they were targeted by certain groups.

Talabani praised Syria’s late President Hafez al-Assad for his invaluable support, providing accommodation and passports.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Karim revealed he had warned President Bashar al-Assad, on behalf of Talabani, that militants allowed into Iraq to fight US forces might later turn against Syria.

This, Karim noted, did happen.

After the Israeli invasion of Beirut in 1982, Karim relocated to Damascus. There, he expanded his Al-Mada organization, focusing on publishing, translation, and organizing book fairs, alongside his political activities.

This allowed him to build relationships with top civilian and military officials.

In 2000, after Bashar al-Assad came to power, he met with Karim.

“I felt Assad was eager to listen, especially given my connections with many intellectuals,” recalled Karim.

“I told him dissenting voices exist but are mostly positive. You talk about modernization and renewal; this is a chance for some openness, even in elections,” Karim said he told Assad.

“Do you think anyone could really compete with you, given your position as the Baath Party's leader with all its resources?” Karim questioned.

Karim then discussed the situation of Syrian Kurds with Assad, noting that many lack identification papers, even basic travel documents. He also mentioned seeing historic Kurdish areas in the Khabur region with their names changed to Arabic, which causes sensitivities.

“I am not satisfied with this situation. Rest assured, this issue is on my agenda, and you will hear positive news about it,” Karim cited Assad as saying at the time.

In a later meeting, after the change in Iraq, Karim met Assad several times.

On one occasion, Karim recalls conveying Talabani’s greetings and concerns about armed fighters moving into Iraq and the dangers this posed to both Iraq and possibly Syria.

“We have deployed large forces to secure the borders, but what can we do? There are tribes and smugglers,” Assad complained about the situation.

“I told President Assad that as Fakhri Karim, I couldn’t share with the Americans what I know. I assured him that terrorists enter Iraq from a specific location I’m familiar with, not from all borders,” Karim recounted to Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I also noted that Syria tightly controls its airspace, shooting down any foreign aircraft,” he added.

Assad then responded to Karim and said: “We’re prepared, let us know what we can do.”

In reality, Damascus was worried because there were reports suggesting that Syria’s Baath regime could be the next target for the US army at its borders. Additionally, Damascus was concerned about the sectarian divisions—Shiite, Sunni, and Kurdish—in dealing with Iraq and the potential impact on Syria.

Repairing Kurdish Relations

Karim has spent years working on repairing the relationship between Kurdish leaders Talabani and Masoud Barzani.

This history began with the split that gave rise to the ‘Patriotic Union of Kurdistan’ from the ‘Kurdistan Democratic Party.’

Despite bloody conflicts and external meddling, Karim believes Kurdish leaders unify in the face of danger to their people and region, a pattern he expects to continue.

Karim believes that the Kurdish leadership, symbolized by Masoud Barzani and Jalal Talabani, made a big mistake at the beginning by focusing only on regional issues, ignoring Baghdad’s affairs.

He thinks they should have aimed for a federal democratic system that respects citizenship rights.

Karim pointed out that without a unified Iraq, the region’s rights would be uncertain. He also criticized the Shiite-Kurdish alliance, which he sees as odd.

Additionally, he mentioned mistakes in failing to unify regional institutions and increasing corruption, with party interests often trumping competence in appointments.

Asked about the personal bond between Talabani and Barzani, Karim said: “Both have moved past their tough history, but they haven’t done enough for the future.”

“I want to highlight an act by Barzani that shows his character. When Talabani was sick, Barzani made it clear to anyone thinking of harming Talabani or his family that there would be consequences,” he revealed.

“This isn’t hearsay, it’s firsthand,” affirmed Karim.

“Barzani also refused to discuss the presidency or a successor during Talabani’s illness. I personally organized a gathering for Talabani’s family, where Barzani reassured them, ‘I’m here for you, I’m family.’ His words moved everyone, showing a strong emotional connection,” he added.

When asked about Barzani’s character, Karim said: “He's been a long-time friend, and our relationship has been politically aligned and personally warm from the start.”

“I see him as a loyal friend, and he's shown that loyalty on multiple occasions. He’s smart, decisive, and listens carefully, often changing his mind after thorough consideration,” he noted.

“Once Barzani commits to something, he finds it hard to go back on his word. There was a moment during negotiations with Saddam Hussein when he stood firm despite my advice to reconsider,” recalled Karim.

Regarding the aftermath of the independence referendum, Karim believes that the negative turn in the political landscape began during Nouri al-Maliki’s tenure.

Al-Maliki’s attempts to shift alliances and his refusal to compromise exacerbated tensions.

The referendum itself wasn’t the problem; rather, it was exploited by some to punish the Kurdistan Region.

However, Karim emphasized that holding referendums is a citizen’s right, and the purpose of the Kurdistan referendum was to affirm this right, not to declare independence.