UN Security Council Meets on Jerusalem as Palestinian Negotiator Refuses to Resume US Talks

Demonstrators protest Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, in Tunis, Tunisia. (Reuters)
Demonstrators protest Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, in Tunis, Tunisia. (Reuters)
TT
20

UN Security Council Meets on Jerusalem as Palestinian Negotiator Refuses to Resume US Talks

Demonstrators protest Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, in Tunis, Tunisia. (Reuters)
Demonstrators protest Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, in Tunis, Tunisia. (Reuters)

The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting on Friday to address the fallout from US President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

The UN's Mideast envoy called for urgent international efforts to advance Israeli-Palestinian peace, warning that if the conflict isn't resolved "it risks being engulfed in the vortex of religious radicalism throughout the Middle East."

Nickolay Mladenov said there is a risk of escalating violence following Trump's decision — and "a serious risk" of "a chain of unilateral actions" that would push the goal of peace further away.

He pointed to clashes between Palestinian protesters and Israeli forces and some calls for a new intifada, or uprising.

Mladenov reiterated Secretary General Antonio Guterres' words that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must be resolved through direct negotiations and that "there is no Plan B to the two-state solution."

US Ambassador to the US Nikki Haley remarked however that Trump took his decision to advance peace between Israel and the Palestinians. She said that he was aware that recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel would raise “questions and concerns,” but Washington is more committed to peace "than we've ever been before — and we believe we might be closer to that goal than ever before."

The Trump administration has been working on a new peace plan, but Haley gave no details.

She noted that past Israeli-Palestinian agreements have been signed on the White House lawn, and if there is a new agreement there is "a good likelihood" it will be signed there as well "because the United States has credibility of both sides."

Haley urged all countries "to temper statements and actions in the days ahead," saying anyone who used Trump's announcement as a pretext for violence would show that they were "unfit partners for peace."

Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat later told Al Jazeera TV that the Palestinians will not talk to the US until Trump reverses his decision on Jerusalem.

Erekat also said the Palestinian leadership was considering all options in response to Trump's announcement, the channel reported in a newsflash, without giving further details.

Britain called on the US to put forward detailed proposals for peace between Israel and the Palestinians and described as “unhelpful” Trump’s decision on Jerusalem.

“The UK will also do everything we can to support progress and achieve the vision of a lasting peace,” British UN Ambassador Matthew Rycroft told the Security Council.

Earlier, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said it will likely take several years before the US opens an embassy in Jerusalem.

He added during a press conference with French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian in Paris that it will "take some time" to acquire a site for the embassy, develop building and construction plans, obtain authorizations from the Israeli government and actually build the embassy.

He added Trump's recognition of the city as Israel's capital "did not indicate any final status for Jerusalem."

The US is making clear that Jerusalem's borders will be left to Israelis and Palestinians to "negotiate and decide,” Tillerson explained.

For his part, Le Drian told France Inter radio: “I hear some, including Mr. Tillerson, say things will happen in time and the hour is for negotiations. Until now (the US) could have had a mediation role in this conflict, but it has excluded itself a little.”

“The reality is they are alone and isolated on this issue.”



Egypt Says GERD Lacks Legally Binding Agreement

This grab taken from video shows Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam in the Benishangul-Gumuz region, Ethiopia, Feb. 20, 2022. (AP Photo)
This grab taken from video shows Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam in the Benishangul-Gumuz region, Ethiopia, Feb. 20, 2022. (AP Photo)
TT
20

Egypt Says GERD Lacks Legally Binding Agreement

This grab taken from video shows Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam in the Benishangul-Gumuz region, Ethiopia, Feb. 20, 2022. (AP Photo)
This grab taken from video shows Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam in the Benishangul-Gumuz region, Ethiopia, Feb. 20, 2022. (AP Photo)

Egypt said Friday that Ethiopia has consistently lacked the political will to reach a binding agreement on its now-complete dam, an issue that involves Nile River water rights and the interests of Egypt and Sudan.

Ethiopia’s prime minister said Thursday that the country’s power-generating dam, known as the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), on the Nile is now complete and that the government is “preparing for its official inauguration” in September.

Egypt has long opposed the construction of the dam, because it would reduce the country's share of Nile River waters, which it almost entirely relies on for agriculture and to serve its more than 100 million people.

The more than the $4 billion dam on the Blue Nile near the Sudan border began producing power in 2022. It’s expected to eventually produce more than 6,000 megawatts of electricity — double Ethiopia’s current output.

Ethiopia and Egypt have spent years trying to reach an agreement over the dam, which Ethiopia began building in 2011.

Both countries reached no deal despite negotiations over 13 years, and it remains unclear how much water Ethiopia will release downstream in case of a drought.

Egyptian officials, in a statement, called the completion of the dam “unlawful” and said that it violates international law, reflecting “an Ethiopian approach driven by an ideology that seeks to impose water hegemony” instead of equal partnership.

“Egypt firmly rejects Ethiopia’s continued policy of imposing a fait accompli through unilateral actions concerning the Nile River, which is an international shared watercourse,” Egypt’s Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation said in a statement Friday.

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, in his address to lawmakers Thursday, said that his country “remains committed to ensuring that our growth does not come at the expense of our Egyptian and Sudanese brothers and sisters.”

“We believe in shared progress, shared energy, and shared water,” he said. “Prosperity for one should mean prosperity for all.”

However, the Egyptian water ministry said Friday that Ethiopian statements calling for continued negotiations “are merely superficial attempts to improve its image on the international stage.”

“Ethiopia’s positions, marked by evasion and retreat while pursuing unilateralism, are in clear contradiction with its declared willingness to negotiate,” the statement read.

However, Egypt is addressing its water needs by expanding agricultural wastewater treatment and improving irrigation systems, according to the ministry, while also bolstering cooperation with Nile Basin countries through backing development and water-related projects.