Profile: Sudan's Ex-Intelligence Chief Salah Gosh

Salah Gosh, Arabic Website
Salah Gosh, Arabic Website
TT
20

Profile: Sudan's Ex-Intelligence Chief Salah Gosh

Salah Gosh, Arabic Website
Salah Gosh, Arabic Website

Sudan has finally succeeded in replacing its notorious intelligence Chief Salah Abdallah Mohamed Saleh, also known as Salah Gosh. During his tenure, the government body not only held a bad reputation but also was accused of orchestrating oppressive sweeps and violence against the people.

Gosh, who resigned two days ago, had buckled under the pressure of civil protests that marched for the removal of all stalwarts that served the former regime of the deposed Omar al-Bashir.

Among the host of accusations the former intelligence chief is condemned for by the public are; his spearheading of oppressive operations against demonstrators since December 19th and systematic killings targeting activists over the course of the last four months.

Gosh is believed to also have been plotting, with the help of his CIA connections, to become Sudan’s next president.

Born in 1957 in a far-off north Sudan town, Gosh grew up to graduate from the Faculty of Engineering at Khartoum University, where he participated in political activity linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

After graduating, Gosh pursued an intelligence career with the Nationalist Islamic Front, led by longtime hard-line ideological leader Hassan Al-Turabi. After a military junta took over the African country in 1989, Gosh officially joined national intelligence apparatuses.

Despite moving up the hierarchy, getting himself appointed as head of operations, Gosh’s career received a serious blow after he was caught plotting to assassinate, then Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak.

The intelligence strongman is also suspected of having close relations with former al-Qaeda chief, Osama bin Laden, whose records show he had a years-long stay in Khartoum until 1998.

In a surprise announcement in 2009, Bashir assigned Gosh as a presidential security advisor. However, his time in the former president’s trustees was short-lived.

About three years later, Gosh was arrested for plotting a coup alongside 13 other military and security top-shelf officials. After his release in 2013, he rejoined the parliament.

Gosh had also played a pivotal role in the dispute between al-Bashir and Turabi back in 1999, when he sided with Bashir.

The Bashir-Gosh partnering preceded the eventual downfall of Turabi.

Gosh's name emerged on the international scene during his close cooperation with the CIA for the handed overall-Qaeda-related information.



Israel’s Messages Behind Strikes on Beirut’s Southern Suburb

Men stand at the scene of an Israeli strike on a building in Beirut's southern suburbs on April 1, 2025. (AFP)
Men stand at the scene of an Israeli strike on a building in Beirut's southern suburbs on April 1, 2025. (AFP)
TT
20

Israel’s Messages Behind Strikes on Beirut’s Southern Suburb

Men stand at the scene of an Israeli strike on a building in Beirut's southern suburbs on April 1, 2025. (AFP)
Men stand at the scene of an Israeli strike on a building in Beirut's southern suburbs on April 1, 2025. (AFP)

Israel’s latest airstrikes on Beirut’s southern suburb, known as Dahiyeh, have moved beyond mere retaliation for rocket fire, signaling a shift in the rules of engagement. By targeting the area twice in less than a week, Tel Aviv has effectively abandoned the informal understanding that had kept the suburb off-limits since the ceasefire took effect in November.

The escalation raises questions about how Lebanon’s government and Hezbollah will respond and whether this marks the beginning of a more intense phase of conflict.

Pressure to normalize ties

Observers close to Hezbollah believe Israel’s strikes are aimed to increase pressure on Lebanon to engage in normalization talks.

Brig. Gen. Mounir Shehadeh, former Lebanese government coordinator with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), suggested that the rockets fired into Israel last Friday—which prompted the initial Israeli response—ultimately served Israeli interests.

“It was evident that these were crude, suspicious rockets, giving Israel the pretext it needed to strike deep into Lebanese territory, specifically Dahiyeh,” Shehadeh told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He pointed to Tuesday’s assassination of a Hezbollah member in the Dahiyeh strike, describing it as a significant escalation. “Unlike last week, there was no pretext for this attack,” he said. “This confirms that Israel’s objective is to pressure Lebanon into normalization.”

Shehadeh argued that the US and Israel are working to push Lebanon into political negotiations involving diplomats and politicians rather than military representatives.

“There are also growing efforts to force Hezbollah into making internal concessions, particularly to disarm in areas north of the Litani River,” he added.

He stressed that Israel is sending a clear message: no location in Lebanon is off-limits, and it will continue to act whenever and wherever it sees fit.

A different perspective

Retired Brig. Gen. George Nader offered a different interpretation of the escalation. He believes Israel does not need excuses to carry out its attacks, but argues that Lebanon should avoid giving it any justification.

“We have failed to implement international resolutions, particularly Resolution 1701, and we continue to insist that Hezbollah’s disarmament requires national dialogue,” Nader told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He questioned the relevance of such discussions, given that Lebanon’s previous government had already signed an agreement calling for the disarmament of armed groups and the dismantling of their military infrastructure, starting south of the Litani River.

“As long as the situation remains unchanged, we should expect Israeli violations and attacks to intensify,” he warned. He also cited explicit US warnings that Lebanon could face cuts in military aid and even sanctions if it fails to implement the agreement.

“We are at a crossroads,” Nader said. “Either Hezbollah acknowledges the shifting regional and international dynamics, helps the state assert full sovereignty over Lebanese territory, and surrenders its weapons—or Israel will continue the aggressive approach we are seeing today.”