The Top 4 Productivity Tools You Haven't Heard of Yet

The Top 4 Productivity Tools You Haven't Heard of Yet
TT

The Top 4 Productivity Tools You Haven't Heard of Yet

The Top 4 Productivity Tools You Haven't Heard of Yet

There are so many productivity tools out there that choosing one can feel almost arbitrary.

And yet, in this remote world in which we're living, they're more important than ever. How are you supposed to know if this calendar tool is actually better than the one you're already using? Which project management tool is truly going to make it easier to stick to your deadlines?

I always love a good recommendation from someone who's actually used the tool they swear by. That's the only way to know if something is worth trying out, rather than just another shiny iteration of the same old standard app.

With that in mind, here are four productivity tools that you may not have heard of yet, but that I swear by--and yes, I actually use these!

Calendar

Calendar is a time-management app that offers the functionality of other apps like Calendly, but with an incredibly valuable twist: It gives you analytics on how you're spending your time.

In other words, you can see how much time you're spending on meetings, or with a particular employee, department, or client. You can see how many times you've rescheduled that FaceTime call with your cousin, or how often you make time for family dinners.

This goes beyond anything I've seen in a calendar app before, and I've found this feature to be very helpful. It helps me balance my speaking career with the day-to-day of running my agency, plus lets me see right there on the screen if I'm giving my time to the things that are really important.

Undock

A predictive scheduling app, Undock is designed to make scheduling meetings effortless, instant, and easy.

It lets you schedule meetings directly from your email, plus, you can share agendas, notes, and other documentation within the video meeting interface. If someone can't make it, you can easily share the recording with them. Essentially, Undock eliminates the need for multiple apps in terms of scheduling, hosting, and documenting meetings, and that's been a welcome change.

The predictive scheduling aspect is fun too, although my schedule changes quite a bit so I haven't used this piece as much. You can tell Undock what days and times are generally good for you, and it will suggest meeting times based on that info. If you have a few consistent days and times when you like to hold your meetings, this functionality could be highly valuable.

Guru

Good-bye old Wiki, hello new knowledge base. Guru's knowledge-base software is exceptional for organizations that rely on consistent, iterative processes.

In Guru, your team organizes knowledge in Cards, which encourage you to be concise and bite-sized when it comes to the information you include. It's designed to give your team a single source of truth, and eliminate duplicate or confusing information.

The real value of Guru, however, is how it can capture information from Slack, Google Docs, and other places on the Web. You can use their Web editor to capture text that someone shares directly in a Slack channel or Google doc.

CallonDoc

This telehealth service may not sound like a productivity tool, but believe me--it can save you lots of time.

Right now, all of us have probably had to interact more with doctors than usual, especially those of us who are parents.

Instead of having to interrupt your workday with a visit to a physical office, using CallonDoc's online services allows you to obtain a consultation, order lab tests, request diagnostic imaging like radiology tests, and refill prescriptions.

Productivity tools are way too numerous to get to know the benefits of each of them. These are the four I've been recommending--I think they have features most entrepreneurs and business owners need to improve their time management in real, tangible ways.

Tribune Media Services



Social Media Companies Slam Australia's Under-16 ban

Social media companies slam Australia's under-16 ban - AFP
Social media companies slam Australia's under-16 ban - AFP
TT

Social Media Companies Slam Australia's Under-16 ban

Social media companies slam Australia's under-16 ban - AFP
Social media companies slam Australia's under-16 ban - AFP

Social media giants on Friday hit out at a landmark Australian law banning them from signing up under-16s, describing it as a rush job littered with "many unanswered questions".

The UN children's charity UNICEF Australia warned the law was no "silver bullet" against online harm and could push kids into "covert and unregulated" spaces online.

The legislation, approved by parliament on Thursday, orders social media firms to take "reasonable steps" to prevent young teens from having accounts, AFP reported. It is due to come into effect after a year.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the age limit may not be implemented perfectly -- much like existing restrictions on alcohol -- but it was "the right thing to do".

The crackdown on sites like Facebook, Instagram and X would lead to "better outcomes and less harm for young Australians", he told reporters.

Platforms have a "social responsibility" to make children's safety a priority, Albanese said.

Social media firms that fail to comply with the law face fines of up to Aus$50 million (US$32.5 million) for "systemic breaches".

TikTok said it was "disappointed" in the law, accusing the government of ignoring mental health, online safety and youth experts who had opposed the ban.

"It's entirely likely the ban could see young people pushed to darker corners of the internet where no community guidelines, safety tools, or protections exist," a TikTok spokesperson said.

Tech companies said that despite the law's perceived shortcomings, they would engage with the government in shaping how it could be implemented in the next 12 months.

The legislation offers almost no details on how the rules will be enforced -- prompting concern among experts that it will be largely symbolic.

Members of the public appeared doubtful.

"I don't think it will actually change a lot because I don't see that there's really a strong way to police it," 41-year-old Emily Beall told AFP in Melbourne.

Arthur McCormack, 19, said some things he had seen on social media when he was younger were "sort of traumatic".

"I think it's good that the government is on this ban. But in terms of enforcement, I'm not sure how it will be carried out," he said.

Meta -- owner of Facebook and Instagram -- called for consultation on the rules to ensure a "technically feasible outcome that does not place an onerous burden on parents and teens".

- 'Serious concerns' -

But Meta said it was concerned "about the process, which rushed the legislation through while failing to properly consider the evidence, what industry already does to ensure age-appropriate experiences, and the voices of young people".

A Snapchat spokesperson said the company had raised "serious concerns" about the law and that "many unanswered questions" remained about how it would work.

But the company said it would engage closely with the government to develop an approach balancing "privacy, safety and practicality".

UNICEF Australia policy chief Katie Maskiell said young people need to be protected online but also included in the digital world.

"This ban risks pushing children into increasingly covert and unregulated online spaces as well as preventing them from accessing aspects of the online world essential to their wellbeing," she said.

Leo Puglisi, a 17-year-old online journalist based in Melbourne, was critical of the legislation.

He founded streaming channel 6 News, which provides hourly news bulletins on national and international issues, in 2019 at the age of 11.

- Global attention -

"We've been built up by having 13 to 15-year-olds see 6 News online and then join the team," Puglisi said in a statement.

"We have said that this ban seriously risks restricting creativity from our young people, no matter what passion or future career they want to explore," he added.

One of the biggest issues will be privacy -- what age-verification information is used, how it is collected and by whom.

Social media companies remain adamant that age verification should be the job of app stores, but the government believes tech platforms should be responsible.

Exemptions will likely be granted to some companies, such as WhatsApp and YouTube, which teenagers may need to use for recreation, school work or other reasons.

The legislation will be closely monitored by other countries, with many weighing whether to implement similar bans.

Lawmakers from Spain to Florida have proposed social media bans for young teens, although none of the measures have been implemented yet.

China has restricted access for minors since 2021, with under-14s not allowed to spend more than 40 minutes a day on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok.