Lebanon Faces International Pressure to Hold Elections on Time

Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri heads a parliamentary session, to discuss the new cabinet's policy program and hold a vote of confidence at UNESCO palace in Beirut, Lebanon September 20, 2021. (Reuters)
Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri heads a parliamentary session, to discuss the new cabinet's policy program and hold a vote of confidence at UNESCO palace in Beirut, Lebanon September 20, 2021. (Reuters)
TT

Lebanon Faces International Pressure to Hold Elections on Time

Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri heads a parliamentary session, to discuss the new cabinet's policy program and hold a vote of confidence at UNESCO palace in Beirut, Lebanon September 20, 2021. (Reuters)
Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri heads a parliamentary session, to discuss the new cabinet's policy program and hold a vote of confidence at UNESCO palace in Beirut, Lebanon September 20, 2021. (Reuters)

Lebanon’s political parties have expressed contradictory positions on the fate of next year’s parliamentary elections.

Th term of the current legislature ends on May 21.

The Strong Lebanon parliamentary bloc, headed by MP Gebran Bassil, is preparing to file an appeal before the Constitutional Council against amendments to the electoral law, including a change of date of the elections, which are set for March 27.

Minister of Interior Bassam Mawlawi is meanwhile expected to sign a decree calling on the electoral bodies to participate in the voting process. The decree will then be signed by Prime Minister Najib Mikati, who in turn, will send it to President Michel Aoun for his final approval.

However, speculation is rife over the possibility that the president would delay signing the decree, pending the decision of the Constitutional Council regarding the challenge submitted by Bassil, Aoun’s son-in-law.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, political sources questioned whether the required quorum would be secured for the convening of the Council, meaning the presence of eight out of ten judges, who are equally distributed between Muslims and Christians. The sources stressed in this regard that confessional and sectarian divisions could also affect the positions within the Council.

According to the sources, accepting the appeal within the legal period of one month from the date of its submission would not impede the elections. They explained that such acceptance would remain within the limits of setting another date for the polls.

By signing the decree pertaining to the electoral bodies, Mikati intends to pass an irrevocable message to the international community about his determination to hold the elections on time, in compliance with his government’s ministerial statement and his commitment to the pledges made in this regard.

Therefore, the parliamentary elections cannot be separated - according to the same sources - from the political rift that was behind the crisis in Lebanese-Gulf relations, which requires the government to adopt a comprehensive approach to mend them.

Moreover, although the elections are an opportunity for re-establishing the current ruling authority, most of the so-called “political class” has not concealed its concern over the results that may see them lose seats at parliament even though the opposition has yet to unify and organize its ranks.

According to the sources, failure to hold the parliamentary elections would pit Lebanon against the international community, which has expressed its opposition to the ruling class extending the term of parliament.

Should the term be extended, the international community may respond by imposing sanctions on the involved parties.



Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
TT

Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)

Israel’s insistence that France can not be a member of the international committee that will monitor a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon is due to a series of French practices that have disturbed Israel recently, political sources in Tel Aviv revealed.
These practices are most notably attributed to the French judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, who has joined other judges to unanimously issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, the sources revealed.
“The Israeli government is following with concern the French role at The Hague,” they said, noting that veteran French lawyer Gilles Devers led a team of 300 international lawyers of various nationalities who volunteered to accuse Israel of “committing war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
According to the Israeli Maariv newspaper, Israeli officials believe that Devers, who signed the arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Galant, would not have dared to do so without having received a green light from French President Emmanuel Macron.
Israeli sources also mentioned other reasons for Israel’s anger at France, such as the government’s decision to bar Israeli firms from exhibiting at the Euronaval arms show near Paris earlier this month.
French officials have repeatedly said that Paris is committed to Israel's security and point out that its military helped defend Israel after Iranian attacks in April and earlier this month.
Paris has so far also refused to recognize the Palestinian state. But the Israeli government is not satisfied. It wants France to follow the United States and blindly support its war in Gaza and Lebanon.
Tel Aviv also feels incredibly confident that France should be punished, and therefore, decided that Paris could not participate in the Lebanese ceasefire agreement, knowing that the Israeli government itself has traveled to Paris several times begging for its intervention, especially during the war on Lebanon.
Meanwhile, an air of optimism has emerged in Israel around the chances for an end to the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon following negotiations led by US envoy Amos Hochstein.
But any optimism relies on Netanyahu’s final decision. The PM is still conducting talks with his friends and allies of the far right who reject the ceasefire agreement and instead, demand that Lebanese citizens not be allowed to return to their villages on the border with Israel. They also request that a security belt be turned into a permanently depopulated and mined zone.
Hochstein Talks
Meanwhile, political sources in Israel claim that what is holding up a ceasefire deal so far is Lebanon. According to Israel's Channel 12, Hochstein expressed a “firm stance” during his talks with the Lebanese side. The envoy delivered clear terms that were passed on to Hezbollah, which the channel said “led to significant progress” in the talks.
Israeli officials said that Tel Aviv is moving towards a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon with Hezbollah in the coming days.
The channel said that during his late visit to Tel Aviv, coming from Beirut after talks with Speaker Nabih Barri, Hochstein said, “I placed before them (Lebanese officials) a final warning, and it seems to have been effective.”
Iran Obstacle
Despite the “positive atmosphere,” informed diplomatic sources pointed to a major obstacle: Iran.
Channel 12 quoted the sources as saying that Lebanon has not yet received the final approval required from Iran, which has significant influence over Hezbollah.

According to the draft proposal, the Lebanese Army must be redeployed to the south and carry out a comprehensive operation to remove weapons from villages. The US Central Command (CENTCOM) forces will “supervise and monitor the implementation of the operation.”
Channel 12 said Israel believes that such details could still derail the agreement. It also said that Hezbollah could violate the truce.
“In such cases, Israel would have to conduct military operations inside the Lebanese territory,” the channel reported, adding that “one of the unsettled issues is related to the committee that will oversee the implementation of the agreement between Israel and Lebanon.”
The sources said Tel Aviv “insists that France is not part of the agreement, nor part of the committee that will oversee its implementation.”