Ex-Iranian Official: No Political Prisoners Among 1988 Executions

This courtroom sketch made on November 23, 2021 by Anders Humlebo shows former Iranian prison official Hamid Noury being questioned at the Stockholm District Court in Stockholm on November 23, 2021 (Photo by Anders HUMLEBO / TT NEWS AGENCY / AFP)
This courtroom sketch made on November 23, 2021 by Anders Humlebo shows former Iranian prison official Hamid Noury being questioned at the Stockholm District Court in Stockholm on November 23, 2021 (Photo by Anders HUMLEBO / TT NEWS AGENCY / AFP)
TT
20

Ex-Iranian Official: No Political Prisoners Among 1988 Executions

This courtroom sketch made on November 23, 2021 by Anders Humlebo shows former Iranian prison official Hamid Noury being questioned at the Stockholm District Court in Stockholm on November 23, 2021 (Photo by Anders HUMLEBO / TT NEWS AGENCY / AFP)
This courtroom sketch made on November 23, 2021 by Anders Humlebo shows former Iranian prison official Hamid Noury being questioned at the Stockholm District Court in Stockholm on November 23, 2021 (Photo by Anders HUMLEBO / TT NEWS AGENCY / AFP)

A former Iranian prison official accused of handing out death sentences during a 1988 purge of dissidents testified for the first time on Tuesday in a landmark trial in Sweden.

Hamid Noury, 60, denied the presence of political prisoners in Iran during the mass executions in the late 80’s, stressing that “prisoners belonged to groups.”

According to the lawyer for the civil plaintiffs, Kenneth Lewis, Noury’s testimony “lacks credibility.”

In statements to Asharq Al-Awsat, Lewis said that the defendant’s complete denial of any violations in Iranian prisons is not only a “fairy tale” but also “absurd.”

“He says he wasn’t there, but we have 58 people who say he was,” Lewis stated.

“The whole world knows that there have been human rights violations in Iranian prisons since the eighties,” he added.

While not accused of directly carrying out any of the killings, the prosecution has alleged that Noury’s participation included handing down death sentences, bringing prisoners to the execution chamber and helping prosecutors gather prisoners’ names.

Noury has rejected the charges.

He has been on trial in Stockholm's district court since August on charges including murder, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

They stem from the period between July 30 to August 16, 1988, when he was allegedly assistant to the deputy prosecutor of Gohardasht prison in Karaj, near Tehran.

He tried to show a completely different image of Iranian prisons. In his plea, Noury said there were no torturing acts in Iranian prisons.

But throughout the interrogation, he admitted that the prisoners were flogged, stressing that it was “a standard punishment in Iran, not torture.”

He added that prisoners’ trials lasted “10 minutes or more.”

Prisoners were allowed to present evidence and documents, and the trial’s period was based on the quality of the evidence,” he said.

Although he denied working at Gohardasht prison and stressed he only worked as a guard in Evin prison, Noury later said he once went on a mission to Gohardasht, without giving further details.

“Iran’s intelligence has dictated Noury his testimony,” MEK spokesman Shahin Gobadi told Ahsarq Al-Awsat, adding that the defendant is “covering up all the crimes he committed with the Iranian regime over the past years.”

The Swedish trial has already heard testimony from several witnesses, including from members or ex-members of the MEK.



ICC Opens Inquiry into Hungary for Failing to Arrest Netanyahu

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán welcomes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Budapest earlier this month. (AFP)
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán welcomes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Budapest earlier this month. (AFP)
TT
20

ICC Opens Inquiry into Hungary for Failing to Arrest Netanyahu

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán welcomes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Budapest earlier this month. (AFP)
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán welcomes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Budapest earlier this month. (AFP)

Judges at the International Criminal Court want Hungary to explain why it failed to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he visited Budapest earlier this month.

In a filing released late Wednesday, The Hague-based court initiated non-compliance proceedings against Hungary after the country gave Netanyahu a red carpet welcome despite an ICC arrest warrant for crimes against humanity in connection with the war in Gaza.

During the visit, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán announced his country would quit the court, claiming on state radio that the ICC was “no longer an impartial court, not a court of law, but a political court.”

The Hungarian leader, regarded by critics as an autocrat and the EU’s most intransigent spoiler in the bloc’s decision-making, defended his decision to not arrest Netanyahu.

“We signed an international treaty, but we never took all the steps that would otherwise have made it enforceable in Hungary,” Orbán said at the time, referring to the fact that Hungary’s parliament never promulgated the court’s statute into Hungarian law.

Judges at the ICC have previously dismissed similar arguments.

The ICC and other international organizations have criticized Hungary’s defiance of the warrant against Netanyahu. Days before his arrival, the president of the court’s oversight body wrote to the government in Hungary reminding it of its “specific obligation to comply with requests from the court for arrest and surrender.”

A spokesperson for the ICC declined to comment on the non-compliance proceedings.

Hungary’s decision to leave the ICC, a process that will take at least a year to complete, will make it the sole non-signatory within the 27-member European Union. With 125 current signatory countries, only the Philippines and Burundi have ever withdrawn from the court as Hungary intends.

Hungary has until May 23 to submit evidence in its defense.