Netanyahu Tried to Back Out of Abraham Accords over UAE’s Insistence on Freezing Annexation

Trump and Netanyahu with the foreign ministers of the UAE and Bahrain during the signing of the Abraham Accords at the White House in September 2020. EPA
Trump and Netanyahu with the foreign ministers of the UAE and Bahrain during the signing of the Abraham Accords at the White House in September 2020. EPA
TT
20

Netanyahu Tried to Back Out of Abraham Accords over UAE’s Insistence on Freezing Annexation

Trump and Netanyahu with the foreign ministers of the UAE and Bahrain during the signing of the Abraham Accords at the White House in September 2020. EPA
Trump and Netanyahu with the foreign ministers of the UAE and Bahrain during the signing of the Abraham Accords at the White House in September 2020. EPA

Israeli journalist Barak Ravid, author of the book, “Trump’s Peace: The Abraham Accords and the Reshaping of the Middle East,” revealed that former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, tried to withdraw from a historic agreement to normalize relations with the UAE, one day before former US President Donald Trump announced it.

The reason for his hesitation was the Emirati insistence on freezing the plan to annex areas of the West Bank to Israel. Thus, he clashed with the majority of the president’s staff, and dramatic contacts took place between the White House and Netanyahu’s office, until he was forced to move forward with the Abraham Accords.

Ravid said that the contacts between the two parties reached the level of tension and threat. The White House envoy for the peace process, Avi Berkowitz, warned Netanyahu, saying: “You’re going to take your greatest friend in the world, and make him an enemy. I can’t tell you what to do but I strongly advise you against it.”

Ravid stressed that the reason for Netanyahu’s retreat from the agreement was due to the results of opinion polls that indicated that he would lose the upcoming elections.

On the other hand, the UAE was exerting no less intense pressure, closely linking the annexation with the cancellation of the normalization agreement. White House officials, who were familiar with the developments, wondered how Netanyahu could put partisan political considerations over such a historical event.

At the time, Jordan announced that implementing the annexation plan would undermine the peace agreement with Israel. In parallel, the UAE ambassador to Washington, Yousef Al-Otaiba, published his famous article on the front page of Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, in which he clearly asserted that Israel cannot implement the annexation while at the same time normalizing relations with Arab countries. This article came as a slap to Netanyahu, who was declaring that the Arab world did not oppose the annexation plan.

Meanwhile, US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman was pushing hard in favor of Netanyahu’s annexation plan, Ravid said. As Netanyahu and Gantz disagreed on the issue, Friedman even tried to mediate between them to move it forward.

Ravid recounted that on June 24, a week before Netanyahu announced the annexation, Friedman met with Trump.

At the end of the meeting, Trump said that he had no problem with pushing the annexation plan forward, and demanded that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, make the decision, but added: “But if anything bad happens, it’s on all your heads.”

It was agreed that Friedman and White House envoy Avi Berkowitz would travel to Israel in order to meet Netanyahu and Gantz, and try to reach understandings about an agreed-upon annexation plan, or remove the issue from the agenda until after the US elections.

Kushner laid some groundwork for the trip by telling Netanyahu annexation must not happen without a green light from the White House or without any concessions to the Palestinians. “I told Netanyahu the goal was to implement Trump’s plan, not unilateral annexation," Kushner told Ravid.

According to the book, Netanyahu threatened to advance the annexation step in the West Bank without a green light from the White House. In another meeting two days later, Netanyahu told Friedman and Berkowitz that he wanted to annex 13 percent of the West Bank, including settlements, and refused to grant anything to the Palestinians.

On July 1, Berkowitz returned to Washington and received a call from Otaiba, who presented the possibility that Israel would not implement annexation in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel.

Negotiations began several days later, during which Netanyahu asked to change the terms of the deal, and said that he would stop the annexation plan, only, if three Arab countries agreed to normalize relations with Israel, not just the UAE.



Türkiye Intensifies Steps to Establish Air Base East of Homs

Turkish-made Hisar air defense system (Turkish Defense Industries website). 
Turkish-made Hisar air defense system (Turkish Defense Industries website). 
TT
20

Türkiye Intensifies Steps to Establish Air Base East of Homs

Turkish-made Hisar air defense system (Turkish Defense Industries website). 
Turkish-made Hisar air defense system (Turkish Defense Industries website). 

Türkiye is accelerating preparations to establish an airbase in the city of Palmyra, east of Homs, following an announcement by its Ministry of Defense last week that it is considering a request from the Syrian administration in Damascus to set up a base for training purposes.

Reports indicate that Turkish military convoys carrying equipment entered northern Syria overnight between Tuesday and Wednesday, likely transporting logistical supplies and gear to the “T4” airbase in Palmyra.

The pro-government Turkish newspaper “Türkiye” reported on Wednesday that the country has taken official steps to take control of the Tiyas Military Airbase—also known as Tiyas Airport, T4 Airbase —located near the village of Tiyas, about 60 kilometers east of Palmyra in Homs province.

According to the report, Türkiye plans to establish a multi-layered air defense system at the base, incorporating domestically produced weapons. Additionally, Ankara intends to deploy reconnaissance drones and armed UAVs with advanced strike capabilities. The goal is to enhance the country’s counterterrorism efforts against ISIS while also deterring potential Israeli airstrikes in the region.

Some sources suggest that Türkiye may also consider deploying the Russian S-400 air defense system, which it acquired in the summer of 2019.

Retired Turkish Brigadier General Fahri Erenel stated that Ankara plans to take significant steps in Syria in April. He mentioned that after the collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, a defense agreement was negotiated with the Syrian interim government. Under this agreement, Türkiye would provide air support and military protection to the new Syrian administration.

Israeli Concerns

Israel is deeply concerned about Türkiye’s growing cooperation with Damascus and its efforts to expand its military presence in Syria.

An Israeli security official, speaking to The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday, described the potential establishment of a Turkish military base in Syria as a “possible threat” to Israel. The official, whose name was not disclosed, warned that a Turkish airbase in Syria would undermine Israel’s operational freedom and was therefore something Tel Aviv opposed.

On Friday, the Israeli military announced that it had targeted what it described as “strategic military capabilities” at Syrian army bases in Palmyra and the T4 airbase. The Israeli official indicated that the strike on T4 was a message that Israel would not tolerate any obstacles to its air operations in Syria.