Washington Restricts ‘Entities’ Helping Iran ‘Militarily’

 A fence surrounds the US Department of Commerce in Washington (Reuters)
A fence surrounds the US Department of Commerce in Washington (Reuters)
TT

Washington Restricts ‘Entities’ Helping Iran ‘Militarily’

 A fence surrounds the US Department of Commerce in Washington (Reuters)
A fence surrounds the US Department of Commerce in Washington (Reuters)

The US Department of Commerce on Thursday blacklisted several trade companies for aiding Iran’s military programs and helping Tehran circumvent US sanctions.

A statement issued by the Commerce Department said that it was acting against entities operating in Georgia, Malaysia, and Turkey for diverting or attempting to divert US items to Iran’s military programs, according to Reuters.

The move against collaborators with Iran’s military programs coincided with the imposition of export restrictions on many Chinese companies for their role in suppressing the Uyghurs.

Meanwhile, former US officials and diplomats have called on the Biden administration to seriously consider military options to pressure Iran away from getting its hands on nuclear weapons, curb its military drone program and deter its destabilizing activities in the region.

Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman, a former US Senator, demanded that the Biden administration exists the Vienna negotiations, voicing his strong belief that it presents the best opportunity to counteract the impressions that we’re left with the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Speaking at an event organized by the National Council of Resistance of Iran, Lieberman noted that the withdrawal from Afghanistan in the “chaotic” manner that it was done had sent a message to enemies, like China and others, that US might be dwindling.

Moreover, Lieberman accused Iran of weakening Lebanon and threatening regional stability and that standing against these actions is “consistent with the priority the US gives to democracy and human rights.”

He pointed to the Iranian regime’s continued targeting of minorities and terrorizing of people.

“How can you trust a regime this?” said Lieberman, wondering how the US can pursue negotiations with Iran in Vienna with all the atrocities its regime has committed.

“We have to change course toward Iran not only to limit its threats but also to use this opportunity to tell our friends and enemies that we’re willing to be tough,” said Lieberman.

“It’s time to stop this game they’re playing with us.”

Lieberman called for being prepared to have all other options on the table, including, if necessary, joining or supporting military activities by allies.

For his part, Ambassador Robert Joseph, former Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, considered that the Biden administration seems to be paying a high price for a bad agreement.

He pointed out that millions of dollars returning to Tehran was a grave mistake and that Iran’s drone program was a reason for significant concern.

He accused Iran of using the negotiations in Vienna to buy time and continue its destruction.

“The correct decision, both politically and morally, is to support the people of Iran in their struggle for freedom and democracy,” said Joseph.

David Shedd, former Acting Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, noted that although talking with Iran was not something he opposes, the most crucial matter remains that the regime changes from within.



G7 Statement will Not Mention ICC Warrant for Netanyahu

Protesters wave an Israeli flag and hold placards as they stand behind a banner reading, "Crime Minister" and demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just before his corruption trial opens, outside his residence in Jerusalem May 24, 2020. The placard in Hebrew reads, " Indictment: favorable coverage = lying to the public" REUTERS/Amir Cohen/File Photo
Protesters wave an Israeli flag and hold placards as they stand behind a banner reading, "Crime Minister" and demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just before his corruption trial opens, outside his residence in Jerusalem May 24, 2020. The placard in Hebrew reads, " Indictment: favorable coverage = lying to the public" REUTERS/Amir Cohen/File Photo
TT

G7 Statement will Not Mention ICC Warrant for Netanyahu

Protesters wave an Israeli flag and hold placards as they stand behind a banner reading, "Crime Minister" and demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just before his corruption trial opens, outside his residence in Jerusalem May 24, 2020. The placard in Hebrew reads, " Indictment: favorable coverage = lying to the public" REUTERS/Amir Cohen/File Photo
Protesters wave an Israeli flag and hold placards as they stand behind a banner reading, "Crime Minister" and demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just before his corruption trial opens, outside his residence in Jerusalem May 24, 2020. The placard in Hebrew reads, " Indictment: favorable coverage = lying to the public" REUTERS/Amir Cohen/File Photo

A joint statement of Group of Seven foreign ministers is set to avoid mentioning the International Criminal Court's (ICC) arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, despite an effort by the Italian hosts to find a common position on it.

Italy, which currently chairs the G7, said on Monday it wanted to try to forge a common position about the ICC arrest warrant at a two-day meeting it hosted in the spa town of Fiuggi and which ended on Tuesday.

A draft of the final statement due to emerge from the discussions, reviewed by Reuters, did not directly name the ICC and its decisions.

"In exercising its right to defend itself, Israel must fully comply with its obligations under international law in all circumstances, including International Humanitarian Law," it said.

"We reiterate our commitment to International Humanitarian Law and will comply with our respective obligations," the statement added, stressing "that there can be no equivalence between the terrorist group Hamas and the State of Israel".

Last week, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defence chief Yoav Gallant, as well as a Hamas leader, Ibrahim Al-Masri, for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza conflict.

The move was strongly criticized by the United States but other states including Britain and Italy did not rule out that they could make an arrest if Netanyahu visited their countries.

Israel condemned the ICC decision as shameful and absurd. Hamas praised it as a step towards justice.