Allawi: America Ruined Iraq, in Partnership with Iran

Allawi and Al-Maliki in one of their meetings in Baghdad in 2010 (Getty)
Allawi and Al-Maliki in one of their meetings in Baghdad in 2010 (Getty)
TT

Allawi: America Ruined Iraq, in Partnership with Iran

Allawi and Al-Maliki in one of their meetings in Baghdad in 2010 (Getty)
Allawi and Al-Maliki in one of their meetings in Baghdad in 2010 (Getty)

When the United States invaded Iraq, the Arabs were astonished and worried, and chose to stay away from the Iraqi scene so as not to be accused of supporting the occupation.

Iran took advantage of this Arab absence and launched a massive operation to prevent the establishment of a pro-Western Iraqi regime.

Tehran facilitated the invasion, but hastened to shake the stability that the Americans were betting on to build what they called the new democratic Iraq. Iran also benefited from dangerous decisions taken by Washington, including the dissolution of the Iraqi army, the de-Baathification, and the illusion of being able to rebuild Iraq from scratch after the dismantling of the state.

Once I asked President Jalal Talabani, who was returning from a trip to Tehran, what Iran really wanted from America. He said that he had concluded that it was ready to negotiate with Washington over files ranging from Afghanistan to Lebanon.

He explained: “Iran does not say that it wants a share, but rather that it seeks normal relations with the US, an end to hostility and to the seizure of Iranian funds in America.”

Talabani was more realistic than former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi. He realized that the relationship with Washington was not enough, and it was necessary to pass through Tehran.

In 2007, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visited Baghdad, which was under the US occupation.

As American checkpoints facilitated the passage of the visitor’s convoy, it soon became clear that the Iranian president’s visit constituted a message that the American army would leave one day, but Iran, by virtue of geography, would remain near and inside Iraq. This is what actually happened, especially when slain IRGC Commander Qassem Soleimani began to destabilize Iraqi soil under the feet of the American army.

Iyad Allawi was not pro-American. He did not recognize their right to tailor the new Iraqi political scene as they wanted. Moreover, his meetings with a number of US officials were not fruitful. In parallel, no language of understanding was found with Tehran. He did not accept its terms, while the Iranian capital failed to tolerate his approach.

On March 7, 2010, general elections were held in Iraq. The “Iraqiya” list, led by Allawi, won 91 seats, while the State of Law coalition, led by Nouri al-Maliki, obtained 89 seats.

According to the applicable interpretation of the constitution, Allawi was supposed to be entrusted with the task of forming the new government. Al-Maliki was able to get from the Federal Supreme Court another interpretation of the article that talks about the largest bloc. A severe political crisis erupted that lasted about nine months, and ended in Al-Maliki’s favor.

I asked Allawi about the parties that prevented him from forming the government, he replied: “We achieved victory in the elections despite everything we were exposed to. Five hundred people were subjected to procedures under the pretext of “de-Baathification.” Among them were a number of our candidates. They assassinated nine persons. They closed entire regions to prevent our supporters from voting, and yet we were ahead of them by three seats. In fact, I was surprised by what happened. I did not expect the American and Iranian stances to reach this point. America and Iran prevented me from forming a government. They worked together.”

Allawi continued: “During that period, then-US Vice President Joe Biden visited Baghdad about three times a month. His concern was that I would give up in favor of Al-Maliki. He asked me to assume the presidency of the republic, and I told him that the people elected us to form the government, so how could I become president of the republic without a job or work (the nature of the position is quasi-protocol)... Biden repeated his demand, and I replied: “By God, if you do not allow me to become prime minister, terrorism will grow stronger... as will hatred for the regime...”

“During that period, US-Iranian negotiations were taking place in Muscat. The American delegation was headed by Ben Rhodes, Deputy National Security Advisor under then-President Barack Obama. The Iranian side conveyed to the Americans a threat, stating that Iran will stop negotiations and cause problems in Iraq if Iyad Allawi becomes prime minister.”

“The truth is that I met Biden about 20 times. I’ve known him since he was in charge of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. His personality is shaky, and he is a liar and a hypocrite,” Allawi stated.

I asked the former premier whether the US destroyed Iraq, he replied: “Yes, America ruined Iraq.”

On whether Washington had partners, he said: “Yes, Iran. Beginning with the dissolution of the Iraqi army, to the Popular Mobilization Forces, the armed militias and terrorism, the death of democracy and the spread of political sectarianism...”

I am Major General Qassem Soleimani

After the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime, a prominent player appeared on the Iraqi scene: General Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Iranian Quds Force. His role was not only limited to draining the American army, but went beyond to impose his decision in choosing presidents, forming governments, and determining paths. He assumed a similar role in Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen.

I asked Allawi about his relationship with Soleimani, he said: “I met General Soleimani in the house of Adel Abdul Mahdi (later Prime Minister). Adel invited me to dinner, but he did not tell me who would be present... Half an hour later, two men arrived at the place... The first one approached me and said: “I am Major General Qassem Soleimani.” During the meeting, Soleimani told me: “We worked against you all the time.” I replied: “And I was against you all the time.”

Allawi recounted his conversation with the Iranian commander.

“I told him: Why did you work against us? I included you in the Sharm El-Sheikh meeting in defiance of international will. I opened all ways for you. We stopped the activity of the Mujahideen Khalq and seized their heavy weapons. I sent you the strongest economic delegation, on the basis of improving the position of the Iraqi neighborhood. He replied: “We made a mistake, and I am now in the presence of a senior commander.” I told him: “I am neither a big leader nor a watermelon. Do not interfere in Iraq’s internal affairs, and things will return to their normal course.”

Putin: Why don’t you go to Iran?

I asked Allawi to recall the most important pieces of advice he was given to visit Iran, and I will let him narrate it.

“In the seventh month of 2010, I visited Moscow, but I did not have any official status. President Vladimir Putin invited me to a dinner in the Kremlin, attended only by the interpreter. Putin asked me why I don’t go to Iran, and I replied: “Would you, for example, go to Finland to become President of the Republic of Russia?” He said: “No.” I said: “Why do you want me to go to Iran to become their follower? I don’t want the premiership nor the presidency. I am a servant of the Iraqi people and the Arab nation and I am honored to do so, and I am not ready to beg Iran or others for a position.” He asked me: “Do you mind if I send them an advisor of my own?” I replied: “No, but on the condition that I meet them here, in Egypt, or in Baghdad, but I will not go to Iran.”

Allawi continued: “The truth is that Putin is a nice, important and knowledgeable person. My personal opinion is that Russia’s morals are closer to the Arabs than America’s. They are more serious, frank and direct than the Americans.”

Bush does not deserve to be president

I asked Allawi about his impression of his meeting with President George W. Bush. He replied: “He does not deserve to be president of America. I did not see him steadfast in clarity or ideas. They had no policy after the fall of the regime... Disbanding the army, de-Baathification, and all these random practices. I explained this to British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and asked him to talk to him more about the Iraqi file.”



Rains Mark Return of Winter Misery for Gaza's Palestinians

A displaced Palestinian man attempts to clear a water puddle outside his flooded tent amid heavy rainfall in Gaza City's Al-Remal neighbourhood on November 7, 2026. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP)
A displaced Palestinian man attempts to clear a water puddle outside his flooded tent amid heavy rainfall in Gaza City's Al-Remal neighbourhood on November 7, 2026. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP)
TT

Rains Mark Return of Winter Misery for Gaza's Palestinians

A displaced Palestinian man attempts to clear a water puddle outside his flooded tent amid heavy rainfall in Gaza City's Al-Remal neighbourhood on November 7, 2026. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP)
A displaced Palestinian man attempts to clear a water puddle outside his flooded tent amid heavy rainfall in Gaza City's Al-Remal neighbourhood on November 7, 2026. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP)

Displaced families spent a sleepless night in the Gaza Strip as heavy rain flooded their fragile tents, soaking mattresses and belongings, and turning camp pathways into pools of muddy water.

The rain marks the start of another difficult winter for the more than 1.6 million Palestinians living in tents or other makeshift shelters in the territory, where nearly the entire population has lost its homes during Israel’s campaign triggered by the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks.

Majed Al-Omari, who lost a limb during the war, struggled to make his way between tents on crutches after the rains tore down the wooden frame and plastic sheeting of his shelter.

“We will have to sleep in the street tonight, or find somewhere else to stay,” he told The Associated Press.

The UN humanitarian office has said 294,250 families need shelter assistance for the rainy season, but available supplies are enough to provide only partial assistance to 18% of those in need.

It said a lack of funds, slow procurement procedures and delayed approvals by the Israeli authorities mean additional supplies may not reach Palestinians until more than halfway through winter.


Yemeni Government Rallies European Support to Confront Houthis, Protect Shipping

Yemen's foreign minister meets with Arab ambassadors in Berlin (SABA)
Yemen's foreign minister meets with Arab ambassadors in Berlin (SABA)
TT

Yemeni Government Rallies European Support to Confront Houthis, Protect Shipping

Yemen's foreign minister meets with Arab ambassadors in Berlin (SABA)
Yemen's foreign minister meets with Arab ambassadors in Berlin (SABA)

The Yemeni government has intensified its diplomatic efforts in Berlin to mobilize European political and economic support for confronting Houthi escalation and restoring state institutions.

The diplomatic push comes amid warnings that the threat posed by the Iran-backed group could extend to international maritime security and global trade interests, alongside calls to correct what the government describes as misleading narratives about the Yemeni crisis.

During a series of meetings with German officials and lawmakers, Arab diplomats, experts and representatives of research centers, Foreign Minister and Minister of Expatriates Dr. Afrah Al-Zouba said continued international tolerance of Houthi violations had emboldened the group to expand its destabilizing activities and extend its threats beyond Yemen to vital regional shipping routes.

At a roundtable organized by Germany's Körber Foundation as part of the Berlin Political Breakfast, Al-Zouba outlined the roots of Yemen's crisis, beginning with the Houthi coup against the national consensus and internationally recognized government in September 2014.

She recalled the group's armed takeover of the capital, Sanaa, and its undermining of the outcomes of the National Dialogue Conference, leading to the latest military escalation and attempts to target international shipping in the Bab Al-Mandab Strait.

Al-Zouba said the group's escalating actions posed a direct threat to regional and international peace and security, warning that international silence and tolerance of its violations gave the Houthis greater room to continue threatening global trade.

Expanding Houthi Threat

As part of the same diplomatic efforts, Al-Zouba warned during another roundtable organized by Germany's Konrad Adenauer Foundation that the Houthi threat was expanding to regional security and international shipping.

She pointed to attacks on shipping routes and coordination with terrorist groups in the Horn of Africa, including Somalia's Al-Shabaab.

Al-Zouba linked the Houthis' rejection of peace efforts and attempts to establish control over the Bab Al-Mandab Strait to the launch of Operation Fajr Yemen.

She said the operation aimed to restore state institutions and protect maritime routes against threats to international shipping and trade.

The minister urged participating officials, experts and members of Germany's governing party to convey an accurate picture of developments in Yemen to their institutions and policymakers and to correct misleading narratives about the crisis.

She stressed the need to ensure that Yemenis' voices were heard and that the military escalation's humanitarian consequences received appropriate attention.

Al-Zouba emphasized that political, economic and humanitarian support for the Yemeni government was essential to strengthening its ability to fulfill its responsibilities, consolidate stability and restore state institutions.

Siege of Taiz and Collective Punishment

The humanitarian situation in the city of Taiz featured prominently in the minister's discussions.

She highlighted the continuing Houthi siege and its consequences, including restrictions on the entry of food, medicine and essential supplies, the closure of healthcare facilities and obstruction of efforts to evacuate patients and wounded civilians through safe corridors.

Al-Zouba described these practices as collective punishment against civilians, saying they had intensified the suffering of the most vulnerable groups, particularly women and children.

She added that the siege had caused civilian deaths because people were unable to obtain necessary medical care and supplies.

During a meeting with Armin Laschet, chairman of the German Bundestag's Foreign Affairs Committee, Al-Zouba discussed developments in Yemen and their regional repercussions.

She stressed that threats to freedom of navigation and global trade represented an extension of the Houthis' destabilizing activities since the group seized control of state institutions.

Al-Zouba also outlined the internationally recognized government's efforts, operating from the temporary capital Aden, to fulfill its public service and development responsibilities.

She emphasized that stabilizing state institutions and securing their own revenue sources were essential to addressing the humanitarian crisis sustainably.

The foreign minister called on Germany and European partners to provide urgent political and economic support to the government, with particular emphasis on strengthening national capabilities.

These include the coast guard and maritime border surveillance, which would improve Yemen's ability to combat the smuggling of Iranian weapons and military technology to the Houthis.

According to Yemen's official media, Laschet expressed concern over Houthi human rights violations, particularly the recruitment of children and deteriorating living conditions among civilians.

He stressed that attacks on shipping in the Red Sea threatened the economic security of European Union countries and the wider world.

The German official also emphasized the need for Germany's parliament and government, in coordination with the European Union, to develop a new strategy for addressing the Yemeni crisis, one that keeps pace with rapidly evolving developments and protects regional and international security.


Hamas Awaits Positive Response from Board of Peace to Salvage Gaza Agreement

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and US President Donald Trump sign the Gaza ceasefire agreement in Sharm El-Sheikh in October 2025 (Egyptian Presidency)
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and US President Donald Trump sign the Gaza ceasefire agreement in Sharm El-Sheikh in October 2025 (Egyptian Presidency)
TT

Hamas Awaits Positive Response from Board of Peace to Salvage Gaza Agreement

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and US President Donald Trump sign the Gaza ceasefire agreement in Sharm El-Sheikh in October 2025 (Egyptian Presidency)
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and US President Donald Trump sign the Gaza ceasefire agreement in Sharm El-Sheikh in October 2025 (Egyptian Presidency)

Tony Blair, a prominent member of the Board of Peace, is seeking to salvage the Gaza ceasefire agreement by pressing Israel to begin implementing some of its provisions in stages, pending full implementation, following the conclusion of Israel's Knesset elections in recent days.

Meanwhile, Hamas is awaiting a positive response concerning the fate and future of the agreement, as security and humanitarian conditions in the Gaza Strip continue to deteriorate.

Blair met Israeli President Isaac Herzog on Thursday morning, followed by a meeting that afternoon with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who will lead a caretaker government until a new administration is formed.

On Friday afternoon, Blair also met Gadi Eisenkot, a potential candidate for prime minister, to discuss the situation in Gaza.

According to the Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation, Blair held meetings with senior Israeli officials over the past three days to discuss advancing US President Donald Trump's 20-point plan, which was agreed upon in late September 2025 before taking effect with the ceasefire announced on October 10 of that year.

The broadcaster and Israel's Channel 13 reported that Blair emphasized the need to allow the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG) to enter the territory and assume its responsibilities.

He also called for allowing the International Stabilization Force (ISF), which is still being assembled, to begin deploying soon to designated locations.

These would constitute initial steps toward bringing the weapons of Hamas and other Palestinian factions under control.

Blair's visit coincided with a trip by the Board of Peace's High Representative for Gaza, Nickolay Mladenov. It was not immediately clear whether Mladenov participated in Blair's meetings or held separate discussions.

Both Blair and Mladenov visited the US-led Civil-Military Coordination Center in Kiryat Gat, southern Israel, where senior military officers from dozens of countries are monitoring implementation of the ceasefire agreement.

According to Israel's Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, US pressure to advance Trump's plan to end the war has continued even after the Israeli elections, despite stalled talks with Hamas and ongoing Israeli military operations in Gaza.

The newspaper noted that developments on the ground showed no indication of meaningful progress toward the next phase.

Citing sources familiar with the details, the newspaper reported that negotiations remain frozen, with no substantial progress in implementing the US plan.

This comes as Hamas remains armed and continues rebuilding its ranks, while the Israeli military continues operations aimed at thwarting its plans, with those operations intensifying recently.

The newspaper argued that the security and political situation would become more complicated because of the political turmoil following the Knesset election results.

Israel's political system is facing uncertainty amid the absence of a clear majority and questions over whether a stable government can be formed.

The newspaper said this directly affects Israel's ability to formulate a long-term policy toward Gaza, particularly regarding how to proceed with the American plan.

While Washington is seeking progress on Trump's initiative, Israel remains uncertain about its political future in the coming months.

Israel is skeptical about the prospects of successfully implementing or advancing any new measures, partly because Hamas refuses to disarm or surrender control of its weapons.

Citing Israeli officials, the Hebrew-language Walla news website reported several days ago that the political situation following the Knesset elections has further complicated efforts to advance the agreement.

It added that the Israeli military is also making preparations for a possible operation to occupy Gaza City in an effort to force Hamas to disarm.

Hamas Awaits a Response

Hamas, which appears to have few options remaining, is growing increasingly impatient over the failure to implement previously reached agreements, particularly as daily killings and bombardment continue and humanitarian conditions deteriorate.

In a statement documenting daily Israeli violations, Hamas said: "Peace is not measured by the signing of agreements alone, but by an end to the killing and the return of life to our people in Gaza."

In a video message published on its website, the movement added: "Gaza has never been a marginal consideration in political calculations, and the lives of its people must not be treated as something that can be postponed."

A Hamas official in the Gaza Strip told Asharq Al-Awsat that the movement is awaiting a response from mediators who are in direct contact with Board of Peace officials, following Blair's diplomatic efforts and meetings with Israeli leaders.

The official explained that the mediators had informed Hamas that the Board of Peace intended to undertake new efforts to move the Gaza agreement forward, and that the movement would await the outcome of those efforts.

Asked whether Hamas was counting on stronger US pressure, particularly following calls for a change in Washington's policy toward Israel after the Republican Party's defeat in the midterm elections, the official said such a possibility existed.

However, he added that past experience did not suggest the United States had any genuine intention of pressuring Israel, which was why progress remained extremely slow.