Israelis Forgive Military for Failures, but Trust in Netanyahu Plummets to 18%https://english.aawsat.com/features/4624761-israelis-forgive-military-failures-trust-netanyahu-plummets-18
Israelis Forgive Military for Failures, but Trust in Netanyahu Plummets to 18%
A Palestinian carries a boy, treated at the hospital for head injury, after an Israeli airstrike. (AFP)
The Israel Democracy Institute released the findings of a recent poll, showing that the Israeli public is forgiving of the military's performance during the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas.
The military had apologized to Israelis for its security failures, taking responsibility for them, and deciding to engage in a comprehensive war in response to Hamas.
As a result, the military’s popularity increased from 85% to 87%, while the popularity of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government decreased to 18%.
Even among right-wing voters, the government’s popularity has dwindled, dropping from 43% in June of the previous year to 31%.
The public perceives the government as a failure, lacking the courage to acknowledge its responsibilities for these shortcomings, and consequently, it is losing the trust of the people.
Despite the massive public support rallying around the military and its war plans in Gaza, voices of reason have emerged, urging the cessation of the conflict and seeking an alternative path to put an end to the ongoing strife.
Some have warned that the conflict could spill over into the region, claiming the lives of thousands of Israelis, Palestinians, and Arabs.
While these voices remain limited, consisting of a select group of writers and opinion leaders, they mark an intriguing awakening.
Renowned author and art critic Rogel Alpher penned an article in Haaretz titled: “Again, Israel Is Choosing Death.” He lamented that Israel, as usual, was marching towards sacrificing hostages to the drums of war and making yet another catastrophic choice for death.
“It’s a perfect and horrifying welding of the Holocaust and the horrors of the Nazis to Hamas and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” he wrote.
“According to the new ethos, the slaughterers are not Hamas members alone, but all of Palestinian society, in Gaza and in the Palestinian Authority,” he explained.
What Is the ‘Shiite Duo’s’ Problem with Salam’s Appointment as Lebanon’s PM?https://english.aawsat.com/features/5101451-what-%E2%80%98shiite-duo%E2%80%99s%E2%80%99-problem-salam%E2%80%99s-appointment-lebanon%E2%80%99s-pm
Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam waves as he arrives to meet with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (not pictured) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, 14 January 2025. (EPA)
What Is the ‘Shiite Duo’s’ Problem with Salam’s Appointment as Lebanon’s PM?
Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam waves as he arrives to meet with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (not pictured) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, 14 January 2025. (EPA)
Several observers have questioned the strong opposition by the “Shiite duo” of Hezbollah and the Amal movement of the appointment of Nawaf Salam as Lebanon’s prime minister.
Head of Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc MP Mohammed Raad went so far on Monday to declare that the party had been “deceived with the aim of creating division and exclusion” in the country.
Salam was named prime minister on Monday after earning 84 votes from parliamentary blocs. His predecessor Najib Mikati received nine, while the Shiite duo abstained from naming anyone.
Back in 2023, the duo had agreed to a so-called “French initiative” that suggested the election of Hezbollah and Amal’s candidate Suleiman Franjieh as president in exchange for Salam to be named prime minister.
Salam, who in February 2024 was named head of the International Court of Justice, boasts a long history of opposing Israel, which should have earned him Hezbollah’s strong support. He resigned from the post after being designated prime minister.
Figures close to the duo said that one of the issues Hezbollah has with Salam is that since the October 2019 anti-government protests in Lebanon, he has been viewed as the opposition and West’s candidate for the position of prime minister.
Political anlayst Dr. Kassem Kassir told Asharq Al-Awsat that Hezbollah and Amal don’t view Salam as a rival as they had agreed to his nomination in line with the French initiative.
The problem, however, lies in how he was nominated. He explained that internal and foreign forces had reached an agreement that would see Joseph Aoun elected president and Mikati named prime minister, he said.
However, it appears that some sort of internal and foreign “coup” had taken place and that led to Salam’s nomination and appointment, he remarked.
On whether the dispute can be resolved, Kassir said “positive stances” during the government formation process may tackle the issue.
“The Shiite duo fear that there may be an agenda aimed at excluding its influential role in political life,” he added.
A handout photo made available by the Lebanese Presidency Press Office shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (L) speaking with Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri (R) during a meeting at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, 14 January 2025. (Lebanese Presidency Press Office)
Hezbollah had warned on Monday that Salam’s government may be “unconstitutional” should it fail to meet its demands and aspirations.
Raad said: “We have the right to demand the formation of a constitutional government. A government that violates joint coexistence is not legal.”
Constitutional expert Dr. Saeed Malek said “constitutionality” is one of the foundations of Lebanon’s political system.
The constitution clearly states that there can be no legitimacy to an authority that violates mutual coexistence, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.
However, the issue of “constitutionality” must not be brought up when a certain party wants to deliver a political message and prevent the remaining parties from building a state and practicing their rights, he stressed.
“Yes, the Shiite duo does represent Shiites in Lebanon, but they don’t represent all Lebanese Shiites. The community boasts figures who enrich the Shiite sect, so a government can be formed with them,” Kassir said.
“A government would be unconstitutional if not a single Shiite figure is represented in it,” he underlined.
On whether the government needs the vote of confidence of the Shiite MPs, he said the constitution does not stipulate that a cabinet needs the vote of all segments. “It simply says that it needs the vote of confidence,” he added.
“At the end of the day, the issue of ‘constitutionality’ is a right, but one must not exploit this right with the aim to obstruct state functioning and the formation of a government,” Malek stressed.
“No party has the right to obstruct a new presidential term under the pretext of ‘constitutionality’,” he stated.
