Is a Western-Iranian Clash in Red Sea Imminent after US Strike against the Houthis?

The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)
The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)
TT
20

Is a Western-Iranian Clash in Red Sea Imminent after US Strike against the Houthis?

The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)
The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)

Iran announced it was deploying a warship to the Red Sea after the US repelled an attack by the Tehran-aligned Houthi militias in Yemen on a container vessel.

US helicopters repelled the attack, sinking three ships and killing 10 militants, according to accounts by American, Maersk, and Houthi officials on Sunday.

Iran’s deployment of the Alborz is seen as an act of support to the Houthis, but it may deepen the tensions in the area and transform Yemen and its territorial waters into an arena of an international conflict.

The deployment took place after Houthi spokesman and their so-called foreign minister Mohammed Abdulsalam Flita met with secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council Ali Akbar Ahmadian in Tehran.

Flita said he discussed with his host "issues of common interest." Iran’s Mehr news agency reported that the officials tackled regional security issues. Ahmadian also praised the Houthis for threatening international marine navigation in the Red Sea.

The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. This has prompted major shipping companies to take the longer and costlier route around Africa's Cape of Good Hope rather than through the Suez Canal.

The Red Sea is the entry point for ships using the Suez Canal, which handles about 12% of global trade and is vital for the movement of goods between Asia and Europe.

The United States launched Operation Prosperity Guardian on Dec. 19, saying more than 20 countries had agreed to participate in the efforts to safeguard ships in Red Sea waters near Yemen.

Meanwhile, the New York Times reported on Monday that Pentagon officials have come up with plans to strike Houthi missile and drone basis in Yemen should the need arise, but there are concerns that such a move would play into Iran’s hands.

It added that senior officials at the Defense Department were pushing for harsher measures against Iran’s proxies in the region.

The British Sunday Times reported that London, alongside Washington, was preparing to launch air strikes against a number of targets. The operations may take place in the Red Sea or Yemen.

Writing in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, British Defense Secretary Grant Shapps said: "We are willing to take direct action, and we won’t hesitate to take further action to deter threats to freedom of navigation in the Red Sea."

"The Houthis should be under no misunderstanding: we are committed to holding malign actors accountable for unlawful seizures and attacks," he said.

Biggest losers

Meanwhile, Yemeni academic and researcher Fares al-Beel told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Yemenis are "the biggest losers" in the Red Sea showdown.

He remarked that in spite of the threats, the US and Iran were unlikely to take any further escalatory steps.

He explained that the US doesn’t want to expand the conflict, but wants it to remain limited to Israel’s war on Gaza. Iran, for its part, cannot wage a direct confrontation because that would compromise its expansionist ambitions in the region.

It will not burn any bridges at this stage. Rather, it will use the conflict in the Red Sea to gain popular support, al-Beel went on to say.

Moreover, he said Iran’s deployment of a warship in the Red Sea is an act of moral support to the Houths. When it comes down to the wire, it will opt for non-military solutions. The same will take place with Hamas, which is backed by Tehran, after the war.

He did not rule out the possibility of the eruption of "limited confrontations", but the race for power and influence will continue to hold sway in the region.

The Yemeni people and their economy are the ultimate losers in this situation, al-Beel lamented.

Yemeni political analyst Mohammed al-Saar told Asharq Al-Awsat that the instability in the Red Sea is revealing Iran to be a major player in the conflict.

Tehran is seeking to maintain its influence in the region through providing support to the Houthis, he added.

Yemeni political analyst Mahmoud al-Taher ruled out the possibility of a major escalation in the Red Sea.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the countries surrounding Yemen want peace. Iran is also aware that the countries overlooking the Red Sea do not want an escalation and are seeking to defuse tensions.

Tehran deployed its warship to the Red Sea in a show of force and to send a message of support to the Houthis, he remarked.

"At any rate, the developments have proven what we have always warned of. Tehran wants to control the Bab al-Mandeb Strait and Red Sea through the Houthis," Taher stated.

This issue will weigh heavily over the potential peace or truce talks in Yemen, he predicted.

The Houthis and the forces of the Prosperity Guardian coalition will continue to clash, but Iran will not be dragged into a direct confrontation, he said. Iran will continue to order the Houthis to carry out attacks.

Furthermore, Taher said the convention on freedom of international marine navigation binds members of the UN Security Council and countries overlooking the Red Sea to protect the area. Any action by them against the Houthis should be a precursor to the liberation of Yemen’s Hodeidah province from the militias.



UN Humanitarian Chief Slams Aid Plan for Gaza Proposed by Israel, Backed by US 

A Palestinian boy has a bite from a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at the Islamic University campus in Gaza City on May 12, 2025.(AFP)
A Palestinian boy has a bite from a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at the Islamic University campus in Gaza City on May 12, 2025.(AFP)
TT
20

UN Humanitarian Chief Slams Aid Plan for Gaza Proposed by Israel, Backed by US 

A Palestinian boy has a bite from a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at the Islamic University campus in Gaza City on May 12, 2025.(AFP)
A Palestinian boy has a bite from a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at the Islamic University campus in Gaza City on May 12, 2025.(AFP)

United Nations aid chief Tom Fletcher on Tuesday criticized an Israel-initiated and US-backed humanitarian aid distribution plan for Gaza as a "fig leaf for further violence and displacement" of Palestinians in the war-torn enclave.

"It is cynical sideshow. A deliberate distraction," Fletcher told the UN Security Council.

No humanitarian aid has been delivered to Gaza since March 2, and a global hunger monitor has warned that half a million people face starvation, a quarter of the enclave's population.

Israel proposed last week that private companies would take over handing out aid in Gaza's south once an expanded Israeli offensive starts in its war there, which began in October 2023 after Hamas attacked Israel. Aid deliveries have been handled by international aid groups and UN organizations.

"We can save hundreds of thousands of survivors. We have rigorous mechanisms to ensure our aid gets to civilians and not to Hamas, but Israel denies us access, placing the objective of depopulating Gaza before the lives of civilians," said Fletcher.

Israel has accused Hamas of stealing aid, which the group denies, and is blocking deliveries until Hamas releases all remaining hostages.

Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar, currently on an official visit to Japan, said on Wednesday that Israel endorsed what he called "the American humanitarian plan" under which aid would be provided by a private fund.

"It will go directly to the people. Hamas must not be allowed to get their hands on it," Saar said.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has rejected Israel's proposal, saying in April it risked "further controlling and callously limiting aid down to the last calorie and grain of flour."

The UN says any aid distribution must be independent, impartial and neutral, in line with humanitarian principles.

Fletcher said the UN has met more than a dozen times with Israeli authorities about their proposed aid distribution model to find a solution but without success. Minimum conditions include the ability to deliver aid to all those in need wherever they are in Gaza, he said.

Amid the stalemate, the United States last week backed a mechanism for Gaza aid deliveries to be handled by private companies, an approach that appeared to resemble Israel's proposal, but gave few initial details about the plan.

"We will not allow the old, broken system to remain in place," Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon told the council. "We appreciate the efforts to build a new mechanism, one grounded in accountability."

US WORKING WITH ISRAEL

Senior US officials were working with Israel to enable a newly established Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to "provide a secure mechanism capable of delivering aid directly to those in need, without Hamas stealing, looting or leveraging this assistance for its own ends", acting US Ambassador to the UN Dorothy Shea told the Security Council on Tuesday.

She urged the UN and aid groups to cooperate, saying the foundation would deliver aid consistent with humanitarian principles and would "ensure its own security so that commodities reach civilians in need".

"While some humanitarian organizations may ultimately choose not to engage in these conversations, others have chosen a more constructive path, and they will be able to deliver aid in an appropriate way, hopefully very soon," Shea said.

Fletcher said the Israeli-designed distribution model was not the answer. This was in part because Israel said it would limit aid distribution to south Gaza during its planned offensive and people would have to relocate to access aid there.

"It forces further displacement. It exposes thousands of people to harm," Fletcher told the council. "It restricts aid to only one part of Gaza while leaving other dire needs unmet. It makes aid conditional on political and military aims. It makes starvation a bargaining chip."

Most of the 15-member Security Council expressed concern about the proposed aid distribution plans.

"We cannot support any model that places political or military objectives above the needs of civilians. Or that undermines the UN and other partners' ability to operate independently," Britain, France, Slovenia, Greece and Denmark said in a joint statement before the council meeting.

The war in Gaza was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas killed 1,200 people in southern Israel, and took some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, more than 52,700 Palestinians have been killed, according to Gaza health authorities.