Israeli Law Threatens Palestinian Authority with Bankruptcy

A press conference at the Israeli Embassy in London on March 7 for the families of Israelis detained by Hamas in the Gaza Strip (AFP)
A press conference at the Israeli Embassy in London on March 7 for the families of Israelis detained by Hamas in the Gaza Strip (AFP)
TT

Israeli Law Threatens Palestinian Authority with Bankruptcy

A press conference at the Israeli Embassy in London on March 7 for the families of Israelis detained by Hamas in the Gaza Strip (AFP)
A press conference at the Israeli Embassy in London on March 7 for the families of Israelis detained by Hamas in the Gaza Strip (AFP)

The Israeli Knesset has completed the second and third readings of a law, which gives the opportunity for Israelis harmed by armed operations carried out by Palestinians to file compensation claims against the Palestinian Authority valued at hundreds of millions of dollars.

The law was supported by 19 representatives from the government coalition and the opposition, while only two Arab deputies voted against it. It will take effect as soon as it is published in the Official Gazette, unless the Supreme Court stops its implementation.

The law was approved despite the fact that a number of experts and representatives of the security services had warned that it “would cause great harm to the already deteriorating economy of the Palestinian Authority, and push it into bankruptcy.”

The text of the law states that its purpose is to “enable victims of terrorism to file compensation claims against those who pay salaries for terrorism, including the Palestinian Authority, which approves and encourages acts of terrorism by paying salaries to terrorists.”

The proposal aims to “regulate the issue of compensation for victims, and remove barriers that prevent filing civil compensation (damage) lawsuits against those who pay a salary for acts of terrorism.”

The Knesset Foreign Affairs and Security Committee held deliberations on the law before approving it, in the presence of the head of the Civil Department in the Unit for Coordination of Government Action in the Palestinian Territories (COGAT), Elad Goren, who warned: “The cabinet had decided, during its discussions that took place seven months ago, to maintain the Palestinian Authority, while this law creates obstacles to the decision. There are far-reaching consequences for this, and we must think about how to compensate victims of terrorism while maintaining the cabinet’s decision.”

Representatives of the Legal Advisory Department of the Israeli National Security Council and the Shin Bet Service voiced their support for Goren’s warning. Tamar Kalhora, from the Counseling and Law Department of the Ministry of Justice, warned during the session that the law cannot not pass in the Supreme Court, because it does not specify the maximum amount of compensation.



Iraq Condemns US Attempt to Undermine its Judiciary

Iraqi Supreme Judicial Council President Faiq Zidan (second left), Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani (C) and Popular Mobilization Forces leader Falih al-Fayyadh. (AFP)
Iraqi Supreme Judicial Council President Faiq Zidan (second left), Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani (C) and Popular Mobilization Forces leader Falih al-Fayyadh. (AFP)
TT

Iraq Condemns US Attempt to Undermine its Judiciary

Iraqi Supreme Judicial Council President Faiq Zidan (second left), Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani (C) and Popular Mobilization Forces leader Falih al-Fayyadh. (AFP)
Iraqi Supreme Judicial Council President Faiq Zidan (second left), Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani (C) and Popular Mobilization Forces leader Falih al-Fayyadh. (AFP)

The Iraqi Foreign Ministry condemned on Saturday Republican Senator Mike Waltz for submitting a bill that would designate Iraq's Supreme Judicial Council and its president, Faiq Zidan, as "Iranian-controlled assets."

Waltz, a member of the House Armed Services and Foreign Affairs Committees, said he was set to introduce an amendment to the foreign appropriations bill to make the designation.

The measure is expected to garner bipartisan support and make its way into the final legislation, reported the Washington Free Beacon.

The Foreign Ministry slammed Waltz’s move as "flagrant meddling in Iraqi affairs."

Acting parliament Speaker Mohsen al-Mandalawi said the amendment was a "dangerous precedent."

The proposal has already riled members of the pro-Iran Coordination Framework.

"If adopted, the measure will mark the first time that Congress, and therefore the Biden administration, is calling out by name the Iraqi leaders who are enabling Iran to overtake Baghdad's government and use Iraq to foment terrorism," reported the Washington Free Beacon.

"Congressional sources said they are counting on the measure to serve as a wake-up call to Iraq's government as the country morphs into an Iranian client state," it added.

"Zidan and his judicial council are the leading forces advancing Iran's interest in Iraq and helping Tehran's militia groups gain a foothold in the country. His court is behind a contested February 2022 ruling that required a two-thirds majority to select the president of Iraq," it reported.

"Through 'soft war' and the use (and misuse) of the legal system and courts, the coalition of [Iranian] militias has hit upon a winning combination that largely uses non-kinetic tools to build a trifecta of power that comprises the judiciary, civilian and military sides of the executive branch, as well as the legislature," the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) think tank wrote in a 2023 analysis of the situation. Through this effort, Iran effectively created "regime change" in Iraq, said the Washington Free Beacon.

His 2022 ruling "shifted the goalposts for government formation, making it almost impossible to form a government without a super-majority, including the [Iranian] militias" and the Coordination Framework, according to WINEP. This decision marked "the turning on its head of democracy in Iraq and a return to the minority rule," it added.

This decision effectively prevented Iraq's anti-Iran elements, such as the Kurds, from forming a more US-friendly government, said the Washington Free Beacon.

Legal sources explained that the proposal, if approved, would bar various American authorities from working with Zidan and Iraq’s judiciary overall. The United States’ allies may also follow suit.

Izzat all-Shabandar, a politician close to the Coordination Framework, condemned Waltz’s proposal as flagrant meddling in Iraqi internal affairs.

Former member of the Iraqi High Commission for Human Rights Ali al-Bayati said the proposal would "isolate Iraq on the international stage the way late president Saddam Hussein’s policies did."

In a tweet on the X platform, he warned that the move "was very dangerous and demands rapid diplomatic efforts" to counter it. It demands more than just performative statements.

He warned that if the proposal is enacted, then practical steps would be taken to isolate Iraq on the international arena.

Former diplomat Ghazi al-Faisal said the American move aims to counter Iran’s hegemony over Iraq.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that Washington views Iran’s agenda in Iraq as terrorist. It also views it as the world’s top state-sponsor of terrorism.

Congress’ move will complicate relations and create crises between Washington and Baghdad, he added