Opposition Rallies Cry Against Dragging Lebanon to War

Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)
Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)
TT
20

Opposition Rallies Cry Against Dragging Lebanon to War

Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)
Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)

The Lebanese opposition launched on Saturday a rallying cry against parties that are “tampering with Lebanon’s security and dragging the Lebanese people” towards conflict and towards “countries that sponsor illegal organizations.”

It called for the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolution 1701 and the deployment of the army along Lebanon’s entire borders. It urged bolstering the monitoring of the entire border with Syria and the implementation of the agreement on the return of Syrians back to their country.

The Lebanese Forces organized on Saturday a meeting of opposition groups. Held at Maarab, the meeting, “1701 in Defense of Lebanon”, was attended by parties, lawmakers, politicians, activists and journalists, from across Lebanon’s sectarian spectrum, who are opposed to Hezbollah.

The meeting was notably boycotted by some parties that share the LF’s views, while others, such as the Kataeb party, sent representatives. Kataeb leader Sami Gemayel and MPs from his party did not attend the meeting.

The Progressive Socialist Party, National Moderation bloc, Saydet Al Jabal gathering, and the National Council to End the Iranian Occupation in Lebanon declined to attend the meeting.

Some observers said the failure to attract a large number of opposition parties may have rendered the Maarab meeting a “failure”. The LF and other participants said however, that the meeting served its purpose and delivered the message it wanted to send.

Former minister, MP Ashraf Rifi described the meeting as “excellent”.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he added that the meeting was necessary given the circumstances in Lebanon, comparing it to the 2005 Bristol Gathering that helped galvanize the opposition against Syrian hegemony over Lebanon.

LF sources described the Maarab meeting as successful, saying it underlined the demand to defend and consolidate Lebanon’s sovereignty.

“The meeting was not aimed at forming a political front,” they told Asharq Al-Awsat.

They highlighted the timing of the meeting, explaining that Lebanon is in danger and so it was “necessary to launch a political cry and this is what happened.”

“Whoever declined the invite had their reasons and considerations. What matters is that this political cry was made, and we didn’t expect anything more than that,” they stressed.

On what the meeting was expected to yield, they replied: “More of the same. We will continue to do what we have been doing. We will exert more pressure and follow diplomatic efforts that are pushing for the implementation of resolution 1701, which bothers Hezbollah.”

“The implementation of the resolution is the only demand the international community is making. It is essential to avert Lebanon from being dragged to war,” they added.

The meeting’s concluding statement underscored three main issues.

“First: The possession of weapons outside state security institutions, led by the army, and carried by any party regardless of their motives, is a threat to Lebanese sovereignty and a flagrant violation against the security of the entire Lebanese people,” it said, demanding the immediate laying down of these arms.

“Second: The Lebanese army is trusted by all Lebanese people and so, it has the right and duty to protect the borders and Lebanese sovereignty against any foreign attack, especially from Israel,” continued the statement.

“Third: The Lebanese government, even in its caretaker capacity, alone has the responsibility to implement and apply Lebanese laws and international resolutions,” it continued.

“Based on the above and the developments in southern Lebanon and the possibility that they may take a turn for the worst, the gatherers appeal to the caretaker government of Prime Minister Najib Mikati to immediately issue orders for the deployment of the army in regions south of the Litani River and along the entire border with Israel,” it said.

“Such a step would have a massive political impact and the deployment could act as a decisive deterrence force against any Israeli plots and possible offensive against Lebanese sovereignty,” it went on to say.

It also called for tightening security along the border with Syria and closing all illegal crossing through which weapons, people, funds, goods, illicit material and criminals continue to be smuggled.

LF leader Samir Geagea said the meeting was aimed at drafting with a small roadmap to attempt to prevent Lebanon from being dragged to war and stress the need to implement resolution 1701 in full, which has been an issue of consensus by successive governments.

Moreover, he noted that Lebanon is living in a state of the “non-state” with the existence of a “statelet that has usurped the country’s military decisions.”

The meeting was held to discuss “what can be done in wake of diplomatic reports that have warned that the situation in the South could deteriorate,” he added.

He warned that allowing Hezbollah to maintain its line of action is a threat to the whole of Lebanon, remarking that facts have demonstrated that the Iran-backed party is incapable of defending Lebanon against Israel.

Hezbollah claims that its operations against Israel are aimed at supporting Gaza, when in fact, they have not helped Gaza in any way, he stated. “Rather, the fighting has cost Lebanon dearly in losses of life and damage to southern villages and regions. It has also led to massive economic losses,” he said.

“Iran’s intervention itself has done more harm than good to the Palestinian cause,” he added.

Hezbollah has also played a negative role as attested by the international community against it and Iran, he continued.

“So, the main winners in the scenario are Iran and Israel, while Palestine is the biggest loser,” Geagea noted.



Syrians Rejoice during First Eid after Assad's Fall

Hundreds of Syrian Muslims perform Eid al-Fitr prayers at the Grand Mosque in Maarat al-Numan in Idlib, Syria, 31 March 2025.  EPA/BILAL AL HAMMOUD
Hundreds of Syrian Muslims perform Eid al-Fitr prayers at the Grand Mosque in Maarat al-Numan in Idlib, Syria, 31 March 2025. EPA/BILAL AL HAMMOUD
TT
20

Syrians Rejoice during First Eid after Assad's Fall

Hundreds of Syrian Muslims perform Eid al-Fitr prayers at the Grand Mosque in Maarat al-Numan in Idlib, Syria, 31 March 2025.  EPA/BILAL AL HAMMOUD
Hundreds of Syrian Muslims perform Eid al-Fitr prayers at the Grand Mosque in Maarat al-Numan in Idlib, Syria, 31 March 2025. EPA/BILAL AL HAMMOUD

Eid al-Fitr in Syria was charged with newfound joy this year, as thousands freely celebrated the holiday for the first time after the fall of Bashar al-Assad.

From the early morning hours, crowds of men, women and children flocked to pray at Damascus's historic Umayyad Mosque in the Old City.

"This is the first time we truly feel the joy of Eid, after getting rid of Assad's tyrannical regime," Fatima Othman told AFP.

Following prayer, worshippers exchanged Eid greetings while street vendors sold colorful balloons and toys to children posing for photos with their parents.

"Our celebration is doubled after Assad's fall," said Ghassan Youssef, a resident of the capital.

A few kilometers (miles) away, on the slopes of Mount Qasyun overlooking Damascus -- a site previously off-limits to Syrians until Assad was deposed on December 8 -- a few thousand people gathered at Unknown Soldier Square for an open-air prayer.

Among them were members of the security forces and the army, dressed in uniform and armed. The road leading to the square was packed, according to an AFP photographer.

Some worshippers distributed sweets to celebrate, while the three-star Syrian flag, adopted by the new authorities, waved in the air.

Under the previous government, access to the Unknown Soldier monument was typically restricted to Assad and his close associates, who would lay wreaths there during national ceremonies.

'Celebration of celebrations!'
The memorial, where a giant screen broadcast the Eid prayer, is near the presidential palace.

There, interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa prayed alongside Syria's new mufti Osama al-Rifai and several cabinet ministers in the presence of a large crowd.

He later delivered a speech emphasizing the country faced "a long and arduous road to reconstruction but possesses all the resources needed to recover".

This came two days after the formation of a new government, which faces daunting challenges in a country devastated by 14 years of civil war.

Wael Hamamiya, who had been in Sweden since the early days of the conflict, returned to Damascus to celebrate Eid with his family.

"This is my first Eid here in nearly 15 years. I truly feel the celebration in its full meaning," he told AFP, beaming.

"Everyone who has come is over the moon. This is the celebration of celebrations!"

The occasion was more somber for some Syrians, who were able to visit the graves of loved ones that had been off-limits during Assad reign, especially in former opposition strongholds.

At al-Rawda Cafe in Damascus, 36-year-old Amer Hallaq chatted with friends after returning from exile in Berlin where he ended up after dodging compulsory military service in 2014.

"For years, I thought I'd never see my family again or celebrate Eid with them," Hallaq said.

"The joy of liberation and victory is immense, but there's still a lot of work ahead. This is only the beginning of the road."