Gaza Ceasefire… Egypt Doubts Israel’s Intention to Conclude Deal

Palestinian women walk next to destroyed houses following Israeli military operation in Al Maghazi refugee camp, southern Gaza Strip, 17 February 2024. (EPA)
Palestinian women walk next to destroyed houses following Israeli military operation in Al Maghazi refugee camp, southern Gaza Strip, 17 February 2024. (EPA)
TT

Gaza Ceasefire… Egypt Doubts Israel’s Intention to Conclude Deal

Palestinian women walk next to destroyed houses following Israeli military operation in Al Maghazi refugee camp, southern Gaza Strip, 17 February 2024. (EPA)
Palestinian women walk next to destroyed houses following Israeli military operation in Al Maghazi refugee camp, southern Gaza Strip, 17 February 2024. (EPA)

While the Israeli government on Thursday directed its negotiators to resume talks on a Gaza ceasefire and hostage swap deal, Egypt doubted Israel’s seriousness about concluding a “deal” with Hamas.
“The Israeli position is still not ready for a ceasefire and hostage swap deal,” a high-ranking Egyptian source told the Cairo News channel.
Earlier, media reports said the Israeli government decided to resume the “Gaza truce” negotiations and a hostage swap deal.
This came after Diaa Rashwan, head of the Egyptian State Information Service, said on Wednesday night that “Attempts to cast doubt and offend Egypt’s mediation efforts... will only lead to further complications of the situation in Gaza and the entire region and may push Egypt to completely withdraw from its mediation in the current conflict.”
Several experts told Asharq Al-Awsat on Thursday that Egypt’s threats could have pushed Israel to resume talks with mediators.
However, they doubted the seriousness of Israel's sudden decision to continue negotiations, describing the move as “a new maneuver that serves Israel’s own interests.”
Hamas has lately accepted a proposal by mediators for a ceasefire and prisoner exchange. But, Israel said the proposal remained “far from” meeting its demands and warned its military operations in Rafah would continue.
On Thursday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said in a statement: “The war cabinet has instructed the negotiation team to continue negotiations to return the hostages.”
The Walla website reported that Israel has also presented “amended guidelines for its negotiating team.”
However, it neither revealed details or explained the reasons for Israel’s sudden decision to continue negotiations. The website also failed to say whether the Israel negotiating team carries a new proposal or has returned with amendments to Cairo’s previous proposal.
On Thursday, Israeli army spokesman Daniel Hagari said in an interview that Egypt is “an important country for Israel.”
Egypt, Qatar and the United States have been for months trying to strike a phased agreement between Israel and Hamas that would lead to truce in Gaza and the gradual release of Israeli hostages held in the territory.
Former Egyptian Assistant Foreign Minister, Ambassador Rakha Ahmed Hassan, considered Israel's sudden return to negotiations as a new US-Israeli maneuver to face international condemnations for the failure of both countries to reach a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.
“Israel wants to continue negotiations for its own interests,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.
Hassan also said that the Israeli negotiation team might return for talks with new proposals, different from the Cairo initiative that was supposed to be implemented in three phases.
He assumed that Egypt’s threats could have pushed this new course of negotiations.
The threats of the head of the State Information Service, to completely withdraw from mediation efforts between Israel and Hamas, have pushed the Israeli government to direct its negotiation team to continue negotiations, Hassan noted.
He then affirmed that negotiations will resume soon.
“Cairo will adhere to clear points related to the Israeli withdrawal from the Rafah crossing and the Salah al-Din (Philadelphia) axis to bring about serious talks,” Hassan said.
In return, Bashir Abdel-Fattah, a Researcher at the Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, said that Israel's return to negotiations should not be accompanied by optimism.
“Israel is only trying to buy time and show the world its faith in peace,” he said.

 



Aoun Wants Formation of ‘Consensual’ Lebanese Govt Representing All Components

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun.
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun.
TT

Aoun Wants Formation of ‘Consensual’ Lebanese Govt Representing All Components

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun.
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun is advocating the formation of a government of “consensus” that includes representatives from all political factions.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam has requested that parliamentary blocs submit non-partisan nominees for ministerial positions, emphasizing that they must not belong to any political party.

Aoun stressed on Tuesday that all components of society have the right to be represented in the government, parliament and public administration, as this is already practiced in the army.

“We have significant opportunities that we hope to seize by uniting all elements of Lebanese society—civil, spiritual, and political. Together, we can rebuild our nation,” he declared.

Highlighting the importance of meeting international expectations, Aoun hoped for the rapid formation of a government to achieve political, economic, and security stability, which would allow citizens “to live with dignity, not merely in relative comfort.”

During meetings with professional delegations at the Presidential Palace, Aoun said: “We are at a crossroads. Either we take advantage of the current circumstances and rise above sectarian, religious, and political divisions, or we head in a different direction and bear full responsibility for failing to fulfill our duties.”

Negotiations between Aoun, Salam, and political factions over the formation of a government are ongoing. The discussions, which kicked off last week, have reportedly made progress, with efforts directed toward expediting the government formation process, issuing decrees, preparing a ministerial statement, and securing its vote of confidence from lawmakers.

While the Shiite duo of Hezbollah and the Amal Movement appear to have finalized their proposed nominees for the government, disagreements over the ministerial statement remain.

MP Waddah Sadek, who is backed by the opposition, firmly rejected the inclusion of the “Army, People, Resistance” term in the statement. He declared: “No ‘blocking third’ in the government, and no unconstitutional gimmicks. The slogan of the new phase in Lebanon should be: the ‘Army, People, and State.’”

The Kataeb Party echoed this stance, stressing that Lebanon, emerging from a devastating war between Hezbollah and Israel, must align with the Aoun’s inaugural speech and Salam’s remarks by ensuring the ministerial statement exclusively underscores the state’s monopoly over arms and the defense of the nation.

“The government must act decisively, dismantle militias, strictly enforce the ceasefire, and uphold its provisions across all Lebanese territory,” it demanded.

The Kataeb Party also urged Aoun and Salam to resist the “great extortion” by Hezbollah and Amal to secure specific ministries or positions, in violation of the inaugural speech, calling instead for the application of uniform standards to ensure the government’s success.

Meanwhile, Hezbollah adopted a more confrontational tone.

MP Hussein Hajj Hassan, a member of Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc, commented: “To those betting on Hezbollah’s weakness or the weakness of the Hezbollah-Amal alliance, what will you say when the government is formed? What will you say when you realize the strength of Hezbollah, the alliance, and the resistance’s supporters across all segments of Lebanese society? What will you say when you see the unwavering determination and unity of the resistance at every critical juncture?”