Bassil Disavows Hezbollah, Blames it for Israeli Assault on Lebanon

Head of the Free Patriotic Movement MP Gebran Bassil. (Reuters)
Head of the Free Patriotic Movement MP Gebran Bassil. (Reuters)
TT

Bassil Disavows Hezbollah, Blames it for Israeli Assault on Lebanon

Head of the Free Patriotic Movement MP Gebran Bassil. (Reuters)
Head of the Free Patriotic Movement MP Gebran Bassil. (Reuters)

Head of the Free Patriotic Movement MP Gebran Bassil announced on Tuesday that his party was no longer in alliance with Hezbollah.

In scathing remarks against the Iran-backed party to Al-Arabiya television, he said Hezbollah had relinquished Lebanon’s claim to self-defense when it opened the “support front” for Hamas in Gaza on October 8, 2023.

This weakened the party and exposed its military capabilities and rendered Lebanon completely vulnerable to Israeli assaults, he added.

Bassil’s statements are another in a slew of criticism by Lebanese officials that have blamed Hezbollah for dragging Lebanon to another conflict with Israel. They have slammed the party for taking the unilateral decision to launch the “support front” without informing official authorities.

Bassil held Hezbollah responsible for committing a strategic error when it said it would “unify arenas” in Lebanon and Gaza to champion Hamas, a fellow Iran-backed ally.

He stated that the “unity of arenas” does not benefit Lebanon, rather another – Iran.

Moreover, Bassil said Hezbollah committed another error when it prioritized Shiite interests at the expense of Lebanon’s.

“We are no longer in an alliance with the party,” he declared.

The FPM had struck the alliance with the party in 2006.

Iran is using Hezbollah and the Lebanese people, Bassil went on to say, expressing his fears over internal strife erupting in Lebanon.

“We are facing an existential threat,” he said. He also voiced concern over attemts to divide the country.

Meanwhile, the Kataeb party warned that Lebanon is enduring one of the most dangerous phases in its history that could be a turning point in shaping its future for generations to come.

In a statement after a politburo meeting, it added: “After the end of all conflicts, the Kataeb will not under any circumstances agree for the situation to return to the way it was” before the eruption of the conflict.

It will not agree to the return of the absence of the state and its authority. It will not return to a state that sells its decision-making power to countries near and far.

It will not agree to the spread of weapons outside of state authority, “which the decades have proven is the main reason for undermining the authority of the state and wronging the Lebanese people and exposing them to all forms of occupation,” added the statement.



Netanyahu Dashes Hopes for Gaza Ceasefire Deal

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu during a visit to the Air Force Command, accompanied by Defense Minister Israel Katz, earlier this month (dpa)
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu during a visit to the Air Force Command, accompanied by Defense Minister Israel Katz, earlier this month (dpa)
TT

Netanyahu Dashes Hopes for Gaza Ceasefire Deal

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu during a visit to the Air Force Command, accompanied by Defense Minister Israel Katz, earlier this month (dpa)
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu during a visit to the Air Force Command, accompanied by Defense Minister Israel Katz, earlier this month (dpa)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu affirmed that fighting in Gaza would resume following any hostage deal with Hamas, according to a report on Monday on Channel 12 website.

His statement reinforced fears that the PM has no intention of ending the war and leaving the Strip anytime soon.

“If there is a deal—and I hope there will be—Israel will return to fighting afterward. There’s no reason to obscure or conceal this because resuming fighting is intended to complete the war’s objectives. This doesn’t obstruct a deal; it encourages one,” Channel 12 quoted the premier as saying.

The PM’s recent remarks came while negotiations for the release of hostages faced difficulties due to two issues: A request for Hamas to hand over a list of the names of detainees, whether alive or dead. Meanwhile, the movement insists that a proposed deal include the terms for an end to the war.

Channel 12 said the remarks sparked fresh concerns among members of the hostage negotiating team, who believe that such comments have made it more difficult to secure a deal.

They said Netanyahu’s statements reinforce Hamas' fears that the PM does not intend to reach the later stages of a ceasefire deal.

Mediators are actively seeking to reach an agreement before US President-elect Donald Trump takes office in about 20 days.

Channel 12 said Netanyahu's comments raised serious concerns that even in a partial agreement, the first stage of the envisioned three-phase deal, would not bear fruits.

Netanyahu has long insisted to resume fighting after any deal with Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The PM said neither Hamas nor the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority should govern the territory, and that Israel will keep “full security control.”

Palestinians, Arabs and Americans fear that Israel intends to establish a military rule in the Gaza Strip. Israeli military and security service leaders oppose the idea and demand an immediate replacement for Hamas.

On Tuesday, the Yedioth Ahronoth quoted senior Israeli army officials as saying that failure to plan for Gaza's future governance could lead to a relapse of conditions that existed before the October 7 attack. “It’s that simple,” one official said.

Security officials emphasize that without decisive action on post-war governance, Hamas could rebuild its political power and regain control of Gaza.

“In the absence of an alternative, Hamas will inevitably return to power. Decisions must be made now, before any hostage deals or ceasefire agreements,” officials said.

This concern resonates within both the Israeli army and the Shin Bet. While Hamas’ military capabilities have been decimated, officials caution that the group’s political infrastructure remains intact.

A senior Israeli official said that according to Netanyahu, even if a deal is made, Israel would return to the fighting in Gaza until it achieves its declared goals, according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

“The prime minister is in the opinion that there can be no plan for the day after the war until all of Hamas's capabilities are destroyed,” the official said, adding that there have been discussions in the appropriate forums on the matter.

He said: “the policy of the prime minister in Gaza is that neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority (PA) would govern Gaza, including having responsibility over distribution of humanitarian aid.”

“The security agencies are considering alternatives and would continue to do so. Cutting Hamas off from aid distribution is meant to prevent the terror group from controlling the civilian population and to bring about the release of hostages,” the official said.

Amos Harel, a military analyst for the Haaretz newspaper, wrote that Netanyahu is unwilling to take the extra step to reach a deal, for a variety of political, personal and strategic reasons.

He said Netanyahu needs the war to continue to justify his moves up to now, and in order to prevent the establishment of a state commission of inquiry over the failures that enabled the October 7 attack, and in order to continue, under the fog of war, with his judicial coup legislation.