Huge Crowds March in Rival Rallies For and Against South Korea’s Impeached President

Emergency personnel work near the damage after a tornado touched down in Florissant, Missouri, US March 14, 2025. REUTERS/Lawrence Bryant
Emergency personnel work near the damage after a tornado touched down in Florissant, Missouri, US March 14, 2025. REUTERS/Lawrence Bryant
TT
20

Huge Crowds March in Rival Rallies For and Against South Korea’s Impeached President

Emergency personnel work near the damage after a tornado touched down in Florissant, Missouri, US March 14, 2025. REUTERS/Lawrence Bryant
Emergency personnel work near the damage after a tornado touched down in Florissant, Missouri, US March 14, 2025. REUTERS/Lawrence Bryant

Thousands of South Koreans on Saturday filled the streets of downtown Seoul in massive rival rallies for and against impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol, as the Constitutional Court nears a decision on whether to formally remove him from office over his imposition of martial law in December.

Waving banners and signs demanding the ouster of the conservative president, big crowds of anti-Yoon protesters packed the streets near the court, where police had recently tightened security in anticipation of the ruling expected as early as next week.

Yoon’s supporters rallied in nearby streets, waving South Korean and US flags while calling for the return of their conservative hero, whose ill-conceived power grab evoked memories of the military dictatorships last seen in the 1980s. Police deployed thousands of officers to maintain safety and there were no immediate reports of major clashes or injuries, The AP reported.

Organizers of the anti-Yoon protests estimated turnout at 1.1 million, while police put the size in the tens of thousands. Marching toward streets near the court, the protesters sang and chanted slogans demanding Yoon’s ouster and imprisonment over his short-lived martial law imposition on Dec. 3. Yoon’s powers were suspended after the opposition-controlled National Assembly impeached him on Dec. 14.

“We cannot wait even a single day,” one of the protest leaders said on stage. “This is the order of our citizens — the Constitutional Court must immediately remove Yoon Suk Yeol, the ringleader of rebellion!”

To formally remove Yoon from office, at least six of the Constitutional Court’s eight incumbent justices must approve the impeachment motion passed by lawmakers. If they do not, Yoon’s presidential powers will be immediately restored. Chung Sung-il, a 72-year-old anti-Yoon protester, said he expected the court to dismiss Yoon, “100 percent.”

“If he is reinstated, so many dangerous things can happen.”

The pro-Yoon rallies were attended by members of Yoon’s conservative People Power Party, including five-term lawmaker Yoon Sang-hyun. He has defended the president’s martial law imposition as an attempt to check against the “legislative dictatorship” of the liberals, who have obstructed his agenda with their majority in the Assembly. The crowds repeatedly chanted Yoon Suk Yeol’s name and held signs that read “Dissolve the National Assembly.”

“President Yoon declared martial law to protect free democratic South Korea,” said Jin Woo-chan, a 20-year-old Yoon supporter.

Yoon has argued that his martial law decree was necessary to overcome the “anti-state” liberal opposition, which he claims improperly used its legislative majority to block his agenda.

Despite blockades by hundreds of heavily armed troops, lawmakers gathered a quorum and unanimously voted to lift martial law, hours after Yoon declared it. The constitution limits the exercise of such powers to times of war or comparable national emergencies.

Yoon’s legal saga, which also includes a separate criminal indictment on rebellion charges, rattled state affairs, diplomacy and the economy and has become a stress test for the country’s democracy.

Yoon’s conservative supporters rioted at a Seoul court that authorized his arrest. His lawyers and ruling party have openly questioned the credibility of courts and law enforcement institutions, and Yoon has continued to express contempt for his liberal rivals, endorsing baseless conspiracy theories about election fraud to justify his ill-fated authoritarian push.

If the Constitutional Court dismisses Yoon, that will trigger a presidential by-election within two months.



Netanyahu Says He Will Seek to Dismiss the Head of Israel’s Internal Security Service

 Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends his trial on corruption charges at the district court in Tel Aviv, Israel, Wednesday, March 12, 2025. (AP)
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends his trial on corruption charges at the district court in Tel Aviv, Israel, Wednesday, March 12, 2025. (AP)
TT
20

Netanyahu Says He Will Seek to Dismiss the Head of Israel’s Internal Security Service

 Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends his trial on corruption charges at the district court in Tel Aviv, Israel, Wednesday, March 12, 2025. (AP)
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends his trial on corruption charges at the district court in Tel Aviv, Israel, Wednesday, March 12, 2025. (AP)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced Sunday he will seek to dismiss the head of the country's internal security service this week, following a power struggle over the Hamas attack that sparked the war in Gaza.

Netanyahu said in a statement he has had “ongoing distrust” with Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar, and “this distrust has grown over time.”

The Shin Bet is responsible for monitoring Palestinian armed groups, and recently issued a report accepting responsibility for its failures around the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack. But it also criticized Netanyahu, saying failed government policies helped create the climate that led to it.

The tensions boiled over this weekend when Bar’s predecessor, Nadav Argaman, said he would release sensitive information about Netanyahu if it is found that the prime minister had broken the law. Netanyahu accused Argaman of blackmail and filed a police complaint.

The Shin Bet did not have an immediate response to Netanyahu's announcement.

Netanyahu has resisted calls for an official state commission of inquiry into the Oct. 7 attack and has tried to blame the failures on the army and security agencies. In recent months, a number of senior security officials, including a defense minister and army chief, have been fired or forced to step down.

Bar had been one of the few remaining senior security officials since the Oct. 7 attack to remain in office.

Netanyahu said removing Bar from his position would help Israel “achieve its war goals and prevent the next disaster.” The prime minister is expected to appoint a loyalist in his place, slowing any momentum for the commission of inquiry.

The Movement for Quality Government in Israel, a good-governance civil society group, called Netanyahu’s announcement a “declaration of war on the rule of law” and claimed that he does not have the authority to take the step against Bar because of investigations into his own office.

Netanyahu is also angry that the Shin Bet is investigating members of his staff for their dealings with Qatar. The Shin Bet, and Bar, have been closely involved with the hostage negotiations during the war in Gaza.

Netanyahu recently removed Bar from the negotiating team and replaced him with a loyalist, Cabinet minister Ron Dermer. Israeli media have reported on deep policy differences between the negotiators, who have pushed for a hostage deal, and Netanyahu, who continues to threaten to resume the war.