‘I am Not a Klopp Clone,’ Insists Slot

Arne Slot admitted he had big shoes to fill. Photograph: Craig Brough/Action Images/Reuters
Arne Slot admitted he had big shoes to fill. Photograph: Craig Brough/Action Images/Reuters
TT

‘I am Not a Klopp Clone,’ Insists Slot

Arne Slot admitted he had big shoes to fill. Photograph: Craig Brough/Action Images/Reuters
Arne Slot admitted he had big shoes to fill. Photograph: Craig Brough/Action Images/Reuters

Arne Slot believes Liverpool need only marginal improvement to win the Premier League and has insisted there is more to his football style than being a clone of Jürgen Klopp.

Liverpool unveiled their new head coach on Friday almost five weeks after he officially started. One reason for the delay was to put distance between Slot and Klopp’s emotional farewell, although the 45-year-old’s predecessor still loomed large over proceedings. Klopp’s name was mentioned 11 times during the press conference – on seven occasions in questions asked by the media – and Slot, while admitting he had “big shoes to fill”, claimed he relished the opportunity to build on his predecessor’s legacy.

The former Feyenoord coach said: “Margins are small [at the top of the Premier League] and sometimes it’s difficult if the margins are small and you’ve inherited a team that’s doing really well as there are only a few percentage to improve. But that last few percentage makes the difference between winning it, competing to the last day or ending up number three. Our aim should be that we want to win it and we want to be on top of the league.

“This is what we’re aiming for – to get the best out of the players to reach the maximum – and then the margins will decide. But to get in that position it takes a lot of hard work on a daily basis and we have to come in here and improve and improve and improve and improve.”

Liverpool’s new sporting director, Richard Hughes, sat alongside Slot and admitted that Feyenoord’s “front-foot, attacking football, played with intelligence and passion” not only made the Dutchman their first choice to succeed Klopp but suited the squad. Both men indicated there were unlikely to be wholesale changes this summer, given the quality at Slot’s disposal and the rebuilding work done last year.

Hughes would not give an update on the contract situations of Mohamed Salah, Virgil van Dijk and Trent Alexander-Arnold, all of whom have 12 months on their deals, other than to say: “The only concern I have, that Arne has, about those situations is that there is total commitment from the players to the cause for next season, and we are absolutely convinced that is the case.”

Slot said of his approach: “I don’t take over from a manager where I have to change the playing style completely. At my former club Feyenoord I would say the playing style was completely different [when he arrived] to the style I wanted to implement. Now there are a lot of similarities but of course I am not a clone of Jürgen. We will have some differences and I think the players will see them but also some similarities as well. Ideally I would have started in a season when there were no Euros and no Copa América but that’s not the situation and you have to take it the way it is. The good thing is after the first game we have a few normal [free] weeks so pre-season can continue into the season.”

Darwin Núñez has flourished at the Copa América with Uruguay and as the focal point of Marcelo Bielsa’s attack. Slot has spoken with the striker, who cut a frustrated figure under Klopp at the end of the last campaign, and suggested Núñez would have a fixed position at centre-forward.

“I assume he will fit really well into this [style] because I like him, I’ve told him already,” said Slot. “He might have had some struggles with finishing opportunities but he came a lot of times into those positions. It’s clear for him which position he is going to play. It’s clear for me as well. I just told him that, from what I saw, he played multiple positions and what positions – or position – I see him playing.”

Slot revealed he attended a game at Anfield in 2017, a 2-0 win over Tottenham when Sadio Mané scored twice. That was his only visit before being appointed Liverpool’s head coach. He said: “I knew Pepijn [Lijnders, former Liverpool assistant manager] for a long time and met him at the training ground. The club I was working with at the time, Cambuur Leeuwarden, had contact with Julian Ward [Liverpool’s former sporting director] about loan players.

“I was there as a professional but I enjoyed the game. I had a look and feel for the club, but not in a way that I would assume that seven years later I would be in this position. It was before they won the league and the Champions League but everyone was positive even back then without the team at that stage winning trophies.”

The Guardian Sport



Brazil at Rock Bottom: How the Seleção Lost their Way

Brazil are on their fourth manager since exiting the 2022 World Cup in the quarter-finals. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images
Brazil are on their fourth manager since exiting the 2022 World Cup in the quarter-finals. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images
TT

Brazil at Rock Bottom: How the Seleção Lost their Way

Brazil are on their fourth manager since exiting the 2022 World Cup in the quarter-finals. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images
Brazil are on their fourth manager since exiting the 2022 World Cup in the quarter-finals. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images

If this isn’t rock bottom for the Seleção, it’s as near as makes no difference. Another early tournament exit. Another Brazil team making unwanted history. Their defeat to Uruguay on penalties in the quarter-finals of Copa América marks the seventh time they’ve been dumped from a tournament held outside Brazil before the semi-finals since 2009.

It may not be 1950 or 7-1, but the latest defeat paints as grim a picture as those famous results.

Heading into this summer’s Copa América, there was little expectation that Brazil would win their 10th title. But this could have been, should have been, a chance to build momentum. After years of turmoil at the federation, there was hope that a strong showing could spark a shift before the next round of World Cup qualifiers, where Brazil sit sixth in the standings – putting them perilously close to missing the 2026 tournament altogether.

After strong outings against Spain and England in March, coach Dorival Júnior, who was drafted in to stop the rot, looked to have stabilized the team. But Copa América did little to silence Dorival’s doubters. He has been criticized for failing to react in-game and for making substitutions too late. More alarmingly, his authority over a star-studded squad is being questioned. Before the penalty shootout, as the players huddled up, Dorival was left out of the circle. Raising his hand to speak, Dorival was ignored.

The manager talked throughout the tournament about his focus on penalties. Brazil spent pre-game sessions practising spot kicks, knowing the odds of a shootout were increased with Copa América moving straight to penalties during the knockout rounds without extra time. Yet despite reportedly missing every spot-kick in training, Éder Militão was chosen as the first to take a penalty and promptly fluffed his lines, as did Douglas Luiz.

Accosted by angry fans at the team’s hotel, calling for Dorival and captain Danilo to step down, Danilo said Brazil are a “young team showed that can do great things” and that he “only hopes that people have a little patience”.

Few would agree. Patience was already running thin before the tournament, and the results and performances point to a team that has again lost its way. Brazil won just one game, a 4-1 hammering of lowly Paraguay in their second group game. In their other three matches against Costa Rica, Colombia and Uruguay, they drew in regular time and failed to score from open play.

Brazil are associated with slick, free-flowing moves, but Dorival’s team were meandering. The joy looked like it had been stripped away. There was little intensity. The players expected to inject dynamism – Rodrygo, Endrick, Vinícius Júnior – were either left on the bench or disappointed. Much of the focus has been placed on Vinícius, who is hearing criticism from all angles.

“Vinícius is not the player you say ‘if he plays well, Brazil will be champion.’ If he plays well, he will [only] help Brazil a lot,” Brazilian great Romário said recently.

The evidence of this summer suggests he is right. Vinícius was once again unable to convince on the big stage for his country – and was suspended for the quarter-final after picking up two cheap bookings in the group stage. He scored twice in the win over Paraguay, but went missing in the draws against Costa Rica and Colombia. For his club side, Vinícius is a blur of speed. He’s inventive in the final third. When he’s rolling, no defender can stop him. But that player vanishes when he puts on the yellow shirt. Under successive managers, he’s struggled to find his role. Should he be driving in from the left? Holding up play in the middle? Dropping deeper? Does he connect play or initiate it? He ebbs between periods of frustration, drifting without the ball, or leading fruitless one-man missions into closed corridors. In 251 minutes at this summer’s Copa, he had double the number of unsuccessful touches as he had passes leading to a shot.

But for as much as Vinícius shoulders the creative burden, the failure to get him more involved falls on those around him. The forward can only thrive in a structured team with a stable base. And as Vinícius has grown to become the nation’s most influential player, the team around him has descended into mediocrity.

Before the Uruguay game, midfielder Andreas Pereira said that Brazil’s squad was one that Uruguay could only dream of having. It was a strange statement. Brazil’s midfield, full of Premier League players, had just been steamrolled by a Colombian midfield filled with players from the often ridiculed Brasileirão. But it also served as a motivation for La Celeste’s players.

“To talk about Uruguay you need to have a little more respect,” Luis Suárez said after Uruguay’s win. “Know the history of Uruguay before saying that there are players who would like to be in the Brazil national team. Whoever made that comment was [Giorgian] De Arrascaeta’s back-up in Brazilian football [at Flamengo], so imagine what it’s like for us to hear that.”

If Pereira’s words appeared tone-deaf before kick-off, they sounded laughable afterward. Lucas Paquetá, João Gomes, Bruno Guimarães and Pereira could not handle Uruguay’s high-octane press, just as they had struggled against Colombia. Unable to play through the middle in either game, they resorted to Alisson launching hit-and-hope long balls from the back, fracturing any attempt to build up play.

Standing on the sideline, Dorival could not find solutions. Whereas once Brazil could call on Casemiro or Fernandinho to offer strength and tenacity at the base of midfield, now they’re reliant on a midfield trio – Gomes, Guimarães and Paquetá – who are too often bystanders.

Only Endrick offers any real glimmer of light. The 17-year-old was handed his starting debut by Dorival in the quarter-final in place of Vinícius. But to expect him to carry the team at such a young age, in a difficult moment, is too much to ask. Against Uruguay, he completed just two passes (one from a kick-off), struggling to deal with the physicality of La Celeste’s back line.

Endrick may be viewed as a saviour, but he alone will not fix the structural problems in midfield or the lack of cohesion throughout the team. The reality is that Brazil are now the fourth-best team in South America, behind Argentina, Uruguay and Colombia, who are on a 27-game unbeaten streak. Those sides do not necessarily have more talent than the Seleção, but they all have a have clear way of playing and strong, dogmatic coaches.

If things do not turn around quickly, Brazil are in danger of missing the 2026 World Cup. And if Dorival can not halt the spiral, they will probably be on their fifth manager since 2022.