Pre-season Friendlies in the US are a Harbinger of Football’s Grueling Future

Part of the friendly match between Arsenal and Manchester United (The AP)
Part of the friendly match between Arsenal and Manchester United (The AP)
TT

Pre-season Friendlies in the US are a Harbinger of Football’s Grueling Future

Part of the friendly match between Arsenal and Manchester United (The AP)
Part of the friendly match between Arsenal and Manchester United (The AP)

On a sunny summer Saturday in Inglewood, California, two of the Premier League’s most historic rivals met on the pitch, and the biggest news had nothing to do with the score of the game. Rather, two key injuries for Manchester United (Rasmus Højlund and new addition Leny Yoro) drew headlines after Arsenal’s 2-1 win in which the London side’s two key Gabriels (Jesus and Martinelli) scored.

It is just pre-season. In all likelihood, the injuries were the biggest thing to come out of a game between these opponents in this location. But it may not be that way for much longer. Soon, games like this week’s Liverpool-Arsenal clash in Philadelphia or Chelsea-Man City in Columbus could actually have an impact on the league table.

The reason why lies just nine miles away from where Milan and Man City kicked off their own transatlantic exhibition in New York City on Saturday: the southern district court of New York in Manhattan, where in 2019 the event promoter Relevent Sports filed suit against US Soccer and Fifa. Relevent had initially brought the suit because US Soccer denied the company licence to stage an Ecuadorian league match in the US. Earlier this year, Fifa reached a deal with Relevent to remove itself from the suit, crucially promising to change its statute as part of the deal while admitting no wrongdoing.
Fifa has not yet removed that statute, but has promised to before the end of this year and ordered a review of the rule at its most recent Congress in May. In just about any reading, the removal of the rule is all but inevitable, with Premier League games on US soil surely soon to follow – whether sanctioned league matches or as part of an extra or rebranded cup competition.

With some time probably remaining before those games actually start happening, this summer’s US tour games now exist in a strange middle ground: no longer some harmless fun before a grueling season, but perhaps a harbinger of what an even more grueling club season may look like. Not only will players be playing more meaningful games than ever before, they’ll also be doing so in an unprecedented number of locations far-flung from the communities the clubs were initially founded to represent.

There is plenty of opposition to these potential overseas games, not least from those grassroots fans. The masses that fill clubs’ stadiums each week feel rightfully aggrieved that their domestic circuits would top a generation of rising commercial revenues, raised ticket prices, inflated player salaries and astronomic transfer fees by abandoning the people who gave them the platform to reap all those rewards in the first place. It’s the European Super League phenomenon, in a different form.

It shouldn’t be lost that as English fans clamour for a concession on more favorable kick-off times, team owners may one day have their eyes fixed on a potential North London derby in New York, LA or Nome, Alaska.

The discussion is fierce enough and relevant enough to broader trends of globalization that it is no longer just about football. And the “real world”, like the football world, tends to agree: the trend is all but unavoidable.

“We’ve got seven Premier League clubs in London but when you look at the way the Premier League works, a lot of the revenue they receive is TV rights,” the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, told the Sports Agents podcast. “I think the point that the Premier League would make and some of the owners would make is, why can’t their fans in those countries benefit from a competitive game?”

Left unsaid, and perhaps assumed, is that the clubs themselves would also benefit massively. Most estimates peg commercial revenues from pre-season tours to be more than $10m for Premier League clubs, so it’s no wonder Europe’s biggest teams now make the United States a regular stop. At first, in the early 2000s, they did so because the marketplace was largely untapped. Today, they do so because the taps have been fully installed and fans have shown that they are willing to flood venues, regardless of the stakes.
In 2014, the Relevent-organized friendly between Manchester United and Real Madrid at Michigan Stadium set an all-time record that still stands for most spectators at a single soccer game in US history: more than 109,000, a total sellout of the Big House in Ann Arbor. The games this past weekend continued to draw solid numbers, and in locations like South Bend, Indiana, (site of Chelsea-Celtic) that do not traditionally see top-flight soccer of any type. Sunday’s Liverpool-Man United match in South Carolina sold out within hours. The ticket prices for all these games easily go into the hundreds – again, for games that mean nothing.

There’s value beyond dollars and cents as well. Every day spent in the US by a European club is a chance to get its players publicity opportunities they may never get otherwise – see Christian Pulisic’s appearance on NBC’s The Tonight Show this week, made possible because of Milan’s visit to the Big Apple. It’s the kind of mainstream exposure to a soccer star that is rarely seen in the US outside World Cups. And promoters like Relevent are at the center of much of this activity, and the money it tends to generate.

It’s easy to imagine how hosting competitive games could accelerate these trends, and it’s equally difficult to imagine it not happening soon. So while these summer friendlies might be meaningless, it would be prudent to enjoy them as much as you can while they last.

Alexander Abnos



Olympics in India a ‘Dream’ Facing Many Hurdles

A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)
A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)
TT

Olympics in India a ‘Dream’ Facing Many Hurdles

A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)
A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)

India says it wants the 2036 Olympics in what is seen as an attempt by Narendra Modi to cement his legacy, but the country faces numerous challenges to host the biggest show on earth.

The prime minister says staging the Games in a nation where cricket is the only sport that really matters is the "dream and aspiration" of 1.4 billion people.

Experts say it is more about Modi's personal ambitions and leaving his mark on the world stage, while also sending a message about India's political and economic rise.

Modi, who is also pushing for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, will be 86 in 2036.

"Hosting the Olympics will, in a way, burnish India's credentials as a global power," said academic Ronojoy Sen, author of "Nation at Play", a history of sport in India.

"The current government wants to showcase India's rise and its place on the global high table, and hosting the Olympic Games is one way to do it."

Already the most populous nation, India is on track to become the world's third-biggest economy long before the planned Olympics.

- Olympics in 50-degree heat? -

India submitted a formal letter of intent to the International Olympic Committee in October, but has not said where it wants to hold the Games.

Local media are tipping Ahmedabad in Modi's home state of Gujarat, a semi-arid region where temperatures surge above 50 degrees Celsius (122F) in summer.

Gujarat state has already floated a company, the Gujarat Olympic Planning and Infrastructure Corporation, with a $710 million budget.

Ahmedabad has about six million people, its heart boasting a UNESCO-listed 15th-century wall which sprawls out into a rapidly growing metropolis.

The city is home to a 130,000-seater arena, the world's biggest cricket stadium, named after Modi. It staged the 2023 Cricket World Cup final.

The city is also the headquarters of the Adani Group conglomerate, headed by billionaire tycoon and Modi's close friend Gautam Adani.

Adani was the principal sponsor for the Indian team at this summer's Paris Olympics, where the country's athletes won one silver and five bronze medals.

- 'Window of opportunity' -

Despite its vast population India's record at the Olympics is poor for a country of its size, winning only 10 gold medals in its history.

Sports lawyer Nandan Kamath said hosting an Olympics was an "unprecedented window of opportunity" to strengthen Indian sport.

"I'd like to see the Olympics as a two-week-long wedding event," he said.

"A wedding is a gateway to a marriage. The work you do before the event, and all that follows, solidifies the relationship."

Outside cricket, which will be played at the Los Angeles Games in 2028, Indian strengths traditionally include hockey and wrestling.

New Delhi is reported to be pushing for the inclusion at the Olympics of Indian sports including kabaddi and kho kho -- tag team sports -- and yoga.

Retired tennis pro Manisha Malhotra, a former Olympian and now talent scout, agreed that global sporting events can boost grassroots sports but worries India might deploy a "top-down" approach.

"Big money will come in for the elite athletes, the 2036 medal hopefuls, but it will probably end at that," said Malhotra, president of the privately funded training center, the Inspire Institute of Sport.

Veteran sports journalist Sharda Ugra said India's underwhelming sports record -- apart from cricket -- was "because of its governance structure, sporting administrations and paucity of events".

"So then, is it viable for us to be building large stadiums just because we are going to be holding the Olympics?

"The answer is definitely no."

The Indian Olympic Association is split between two rival factions, with its president P.T. Usha admitting to "internal challenges" to any bid.

- 'Poor reputation' -

After Los Angeles, Brisbane will stage the 2032 Games.

The United States and Australia both have deep experience of hosting major sporting events, including previous Olympics.

India has staged World Cups for cricket and the Asian Games twice, the last time in 1982, but it has never had an event the size of an Olympics.

Many are skeptical it can successfully pull it off.

The 2010 Commonwealth Games in New Delhi were marked by construction delays, substandard infrastructure and accusations of corruption.

Many venues today are in a poor state.

"India will need serious repairing of its poor reputation on punctuality and cleanliness," The Indian Express daily wrote in an editorial.

"While stadium aesthetics look pretty in PowerPoint presentations and 3D printing, leaking roofs or sub-par sustainability goals in construction won't help in India making the cut."