Drivers More Likely to Be Distracted While Using Partial Automation Tech, Study Shows 

Cars are stuck in traffic after police blocked the road in West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 15, 2024 following a shooting incident at former US president Donald Trump's golf course. (AFP)
Cars are stuck in traffic after police blocked the road in West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 15, 2024 following a shooting incident at former US president Donald Trump's golf course. (AFP)
TT

Drivers More Likely to Be Distracted While Using Partial Automation Tech, Study Shows 

Cars are stuck in traffic after police blocked the road in West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 15, 2024 following a shooting incident at former US president Donald Trump's golf course. (AFP)
Cars are stuck in traffic after police blocked the road in West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 15, 2024 following a shooting incident at former US president Donald Trump's golf course. (AFP)

Drivers are more likely to engage in non-driving activities, such as checking their phones or eating a sandwich, when using partial automation systems, with some easily skirting rules set to limit distractions, new research showed on Tuesday.

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) conducted month-long studies with two such systems - Tesla's Autopilot and Volvo's Pilot Assist - to examine driver behavior when the technology was in use and how it evolved over time.

While launching and commercializing driverless taxis have been tougher than expected, major automakers are in a race to deploy technology that partially automates routine driving tasks to make it easier and safer for drivers, and generate revenue for the companies.

The rush has sparked concerns and litigation around the dangers of driver distraction and crashes involving such technology.

The studies show better safeguards are needed to ensure attentive driving, IIHS said in the report.

Partial automation - a level of "advanced driver assistance systems" - uses cameras, sensors and software to regulate the speed of the car based on other vehicles on the road and keep it in the center of the lane. Some enable lane changing automatically or when prompted.

Drivers, however, are required to continuously monitor the road and be ready to take over at any time, with most systems needing them to keep their hands on the wheel.

"These results are a good reminder of the way people learn," said IIHS President David Harkey. "If you train them to think that paying attention means nudging the steering wheel every few seconds, then that's exactly what they'll do."

"In both these studies, drivers adapted their behavior to engage in distracting activities," Harkey said. "This demonstrates why partial automation systems need more robust safeguards to prevent misuse."

The study with Tesla's Autopilot used 14 people who drove over 12,000 miles (19,300 km) with the system, triggering 3,858 attention-related warnings. On average, drivers responded in about three seconds, usually by nudging the steering wheel, mostly preventing an escalation.

The study with Volvo's Pilot Assist had 29 volunteers who were found to be distracted for 30% of the time while using the system - "exceedingly high" according to the authors.



TikTok Faces Tough Questions from Court over Challenge to US Law

A view of the E. Barrett Prettyman US Court House in Washington, DC on September 16, 2024. (AFP)
A view of the E. Barrett Prettyman US Court House in Washington, DC on September 16, 2024. (AFP)
TT

TikTok Faces Tough Questions from Court over Challenge to US Law

A view of the E. Barrett Prettyman US Court House in Washington, DC on September 16, 2024. (AFP)
A view of the E. Barrett Prettyman US Court House in Washington, DC on September 16, 2024. (AFP)

A lawyer for TikTok and Chinese parent company ByteDance faced tough questions on Monday as a US appeals court heard arguments in their lawsuit seeking to block a law that could ban the short video app used by 170 million Americans as soon as Jan. 19.

A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia began hearing arguments in the suit filed by TikTok and ByteDance in May seeking an injunction barring the law from taking effect.

The judges questioned TikTok's outside lawyer Andrew Pincus, who argued that the US government had not demonstrated that TikTok poses national security risks and that the law violates the US Constitution on a number of grounds including running afoul of First Amendment free speech protections.

"The law before this court is unprecedented, and its effect would be staggering," Pincus told the judges, saying "for the first time in history, Congress has expressly targeted a specific US speaker, banning its speech and the speech of 170 million Americans."

The law gives ByteDance until Jan. 19 to sell or divest TikTok's US assets or face a ban in the United States. Driven by worries among American lawmakers that China could access data on Americans or spy on them with the app, the US Congress passed the measure with overwhelming support and President Joe Biden signed it into law in April.

The law prohibits app stores like Apple and Alphabet's Google from offering TikTok and bars internet hosting services from supporting TikTok unless ByteDance divests TikTok by the deadline. Under the law, Biden could extend the deadline by three months if he certifies ByteDance is making significant progress toward a sale.

Judges Sri Srinivasan, Neomi Rao and Douglas Ginsburg were hearing the arguments.

The case is playing out during the final weeks of the US presidential campaign. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, his Democratic rival, are active on TikTok, seeking to court younger voters.

The Justice Department has said TikTok, under Chinese ownership, poses a serious national security threat because of its access to vast amounts of personal data on Americans, asserting China can covertly manipulate information that Americans consume via TikTok.

ByteDance has said divestiture is "not possible technologically, commercially or legally."

TikTok and the Justice Department have asked for a ruling by Dec. 6, which could allow the US Supreme Court to consider any appeal before a ban takes effect.

The White House has said it wants to see Chinese-based ownership ended on national security grounds, but not a ban on TikTok. Trump, who unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok in 2020, has said if elected in November he would not allow TikTok to be banned.