YouTube, the Online Video Powerhouse, Turns 20 

A picture taken on October 5, 2021 in Toulouse shows the logo of YouTube social media displayed by a by a tablet and a smartphone. (AFP)
A picture taken on October 5, 2021 in Toulouse shows the logo of YouTube social media displayed by a by a tablet and a smartphone. (AFP)
TT
20

YouTube, the Online Video Powerhouse, Turns 20 

A picture taken on October 5, 2021 in Toulouse shows the logo of YouTube social media displayed by a by a tablet and a smartphone. (AFP)
A picture taken on October 5, 2021 in Toulouse shows the logo of YouTube social media displayed by a by a tablet and a smartphone. (AFP)

YouTube has evolved from a dinner party lark 20 years ago into a modern lifestyle staple poised to overtake US cable television in paid viewership.

PayPal colleagues Steve Chen, Chad Hurley, and Jawed Karim conceived YouTube in 2005, reportedly during a dinner party. The domain YouTube.com launched on Valentine's Day that year.

Video uploading capabilities were added on April 23, when Karim posted the first video, titled "Me at the Zoo." The 19-second clip showing Karim at the San Diego Zoo's elephant exhibit has garnered 348 million views.

Over the next 20 years, the site has expanded beyond what was imagined possible back in 2005.

"YouTube was started by tech bros who wanted a video hosting service to watch reruns of Janet Jackson's 'wardrobe malfunction' during the Super Bowl," said eMarketer analyst Ross Benes.

"Now, it's the world's largest digital video service in terms of time spent and ad revenue -- it's an utter behemoth."

YouTube reached more than 2.5 billion viewers globally last year, with its music and premium tier subscribers hitting 100 million, according to market tracker Statista.

Users worldwide watch more than a billion hours of YouTube content daily on television sets alone, Google reported.

"If you go back 20 years, it would have seemed laughable that this website with kids making parody videos would become a threat to Disney, ABC, and CBS," Benes said.

"That's what they were able to accomplish."

- 'Firehose' of videos -

YouTube's breakthrough came from challenging traditional television titans without requiring studios or production costs -- it was users who were creating and uploading the content.

The platform hosts everything from concert clips to political campaign ads to how-to videos -- and much more.

"The amount of new stuff coming out is a firehose that you can't turn off, so people are always tuning in," Benes said.

According to Google, more than 500 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute.

Analysts consider Google's 2006 purchase of YouTube for $1.65 billion in stock a pivotal moment, combining Google's search and advertising expertise with a video-sharing platform that had passionate users.

"YouTube was part of the recovery from the dot-com collapse, when people realized monetization was actually important," said tech analyst Rob Enderle. "YouTube became an example of how dot-coms should have been done, as opposed to how they were done in the late 1990s."

Google used its advertising know-how to build a successful model, sharing revenue with creators who attract significant audiences.

The company also enhanced technology and negotiated with studios to address copyright violations on what was once considered the Wild West of video content.

"The piracy aspect isn't quite there the way it used to be at YouTube," Benes noted. "They used to have nudity too."

YouTube also worked its way past concerns that disturbing content, like parody videos of popular cartoon characters in violent or risque situations, were being served up to children by its recommendation software.

The company launched a free "Kids" app promoted as a safe space for children, and is constantly tweaking its algorithm to avoid offending users, advertisers, and governments.

Analyst Enderle credited much of YouTube's development into a formidable platform to former chief executive Susan Wojcicki, who died last year.

"She was phenomenal at her job and showcased how something like this should be done," Enderle said.

- 'Part of me' -

YouTube is projected to surpass all US cable television services in paid subscribers within two years, according to Benes.

The platform now competes with streaming services like Netflix, Disney, and Amazon Prime, as well as short-form video platforms like TikTok and Instagram's Reels.

In response to TikTok's popularity, YouTube introduced its "Shorts" feature, which averages more than 70 billion views daily.

"As the original streaming video platform, YouTube has continued to evolve and differentiate," Mike Proulx, vice president and research director at Forrester, told AFP.

"It's the de facto standard for long-form user-generated video, literally defining the modern 'creator.'"

While YouTube's recommendation algorithm has traditionally favored established creators, longtime content maker "Robert G" noted that emerging creators are once again being featured on the home page.

"I'm really happy that YouTube is changing," said Robert G, who began uploading videos in 2009.

"YouTube is part of me; it is what I do."



Meta Faces Historic Antitrust Trial That Could Force It to Break off Instagram, WhatsApp 

The Meta logo is seen at the Vivatech show in Paris, France, June 14, 2023. (AP)
The Meta logo is seen at the Vivatech show in Paris, France, June 14, 2023. (AP)
TT
20

Meta Faces Historic Antitrust Trial That Could Force It to Break off Instagram, WhatsApp 

The Meta logo is seen at the Vivatech show in Paris, France, June 14, 2023. (AP)
The Meta logo is seen at the Vivatech show in Paris, France, June 14, 2023. (AP)

Meta Platforms Inc. faces a historic antitrust trial beginning Monday that could force the tech giant to break off Instagram and WhatsApp, startups it bought more than a decade ago that have since grown into social media powerhouses.

The looming antitrust trial will be the first big test of President Donald Trump’s Federal Trade Commission’s ability to challenge Big Tech. The lawsuit was filed against Meta — then called Facebook — in 2020, during Trump's first term. It claims the company bought Instagram and WhatsApp to squash competition and establish an illegal monopoly in the social media market.

Meta, the FTC argues, has maintained a monopoly by pursuing CEO Mark Zuckerberg's strategy, "expressed in 2008: ‘It is better to buy than compete.’ True to that maxim, Facebook has systematically tracked potential rivals and acquired companies that it viewed as serious competitive threats."

Facebook also enacted policies designed to make it difficult for smaller rivals to enter the market and "neutralize perceived competitive threats," the FTC says in its complaint, just as the world shifted its attention to mobile devices from desktop computers.

"Unable to maintain its monopoly by fairly competing, the company’s executives addressed the existential threat by buying up new innovators that were succeeding where Facebook failed," the FTC says.

Facebook bought Instagram — then a scrappy photo-sharing app with no ads and a small cult following — in 2012. The $1 billion cash and stock purchase price was eye-popping at the time, though the deal's value fell to $750 million after Facebook's stock price dipped following its initial public offering in May 2012.

Instagram was the first company Facebook bought and kept running as a separate app. Up until then, Facebook was known for smaller "acqui-hires" — a type of popular Silicon Valley deal in which a company purchases a startup as a way to hire its talented workers, then shuts the acquired company down. Two years later, it did it again with the messaging app WhatsApp, which it purchased for $22 billion.

WhatsApp and Instagram helped Facebook move its business from desktop computers to mobile devices, and to remain popular with younger generations as rivals like Snapchat (which it also tried, but failed, to buy) and TikTok emerged. However, the FTC has a narrow definition of Meta's competitive market, excluding companies like TikTok, YouTube and Apple's messaging service from being considered rivals to Instagram and WhatsApp.

"The FTC already has the difficult task, whether it’s looking at 10 years ago or five years ago or today, of trying to define what is the market we’re talking about in a sufficiently narrow way that it can show Meta has a ton of power in that market," said Paul Swanson, an antitrust attorney for the law firm Holland & Hart. "And I do think that challenge has gotten harder as the years have gone by and we see more and more potential competitors in social media spaces."

Meta, meanwhile, says the FTC’s lawsuit "defies reality."

"The evidence at trial will show what every 17-year-old in the world knows: Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp compete with Chinese-owned TikTok, YouTube, X, iMessage and many others. More than 10 years after the FTC reviewed and cleared our acquisitions, the Commission’s action in this case sends the message that no deal is ever truly final. Regulators should be supporting American innovation, rather than seeking to break up a great American company and further advantaging China on critical issues like AI," the company said in a statement.

In a filing last week, Meta also stressed that the FTC "must prove that Meta has monopoly power in its claimed relevant market now, not at some time in the past." This, experts say, could also prove challenging since more competitors have emerged in the social media space in the years since the company bought WhatsApp and Instagram.

Meta's fate will be decided by US District Judge James Boasberg, who late last year denied Meta's request for a summary judgment and ruled that the case must go to trial.

Boasberg "seems to be skeptical" of the FTC's narrow market definition in his rulings to date, Swanson said. He added that the judge also said it is a "fact question," which means he is open to hearing what the FTC and its experts have to say to define that narrow market.

While the FTC may face an uphill battle in proving its case, the stakes are high for Meta, whose advertising business could be cut in half if it's forced to spin off Instagram.

"Instagram is now Meta’s biggest money maker in the US, its most lucrative market, where the app accounts for 50.5% of the company’s ad revenues in 2025. Instagram has also been picking up the slack for Facebook on the user front, particularly among young people, for a long time," said Emarketer analyst Jasmine Enberg.

"The trial also comes as Meta is trying to bring back OG Facebook in an effort to appeal to Gen Z and younger users as they join social media. Social media usage is far more fragmented today than it was in 2012 when Facebook acquired Instagram, and Facebook isn’t where the cool college kids hang out anymore. Meta needs Instagram to continue growing, especially as more advertisers think Instagram-first with their Meta budgets," she added.

But Meta isn't the only technology company in the sights of federal antitrust regulators, Google and Amazon face their own cases. The remedy phase of Google's case is scheduled to begin on April 21. A federal judge declared the search giant an illegal monopoly last August.

"A big theme here is we are applying 19th-century laws to 21st-century markets. And I think it’s an open question whether the judgment developments to antitrust law can keep up with markets as they are changing — these fluid and dynamic tech markets in particular," Swanson said. "And this will be a case that speaks directly to that."