The Odd Behavior of a Subatomic Particle May Shake up Physics

The Muon g-2 ring sits in its detector hall at US Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) in Batavia, Illinois, US, in an undated handout photo. (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory/Ryan Postel/Handout via Reuters)
The Muon g-2 ring sits in its detector hall at US Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) in Batavia, Illinois, US, in an undated handout photo. (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory/Ryan Postel/Handout via Reuters)
TT
20

The Odd Behavior of a Subatomic Particle May Shake up Physics

The Muon g-2 ring sits in its detector hall at US Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) in Batavia, Illinois, US, in an undated handout photo. (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory/Ryan Postel/Handout via Reuters)
The Muon g-2 ring sits in its detector hall at US Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) in Batavia, Illinois, US, in an undated handout photo. (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory/Ryan Postel/Handout via Reuters)

The peculiar wobble of a subatomic particle called a muon in a US laboratory experiment is making scientists increasingly suspect they are missing something in their understanding of physics - perhaps some unknown particle or force.

Researchers on Thursday announced new findings about the muon (pronounced MEW-on), a magnetic and negatively charged particle similar to its cousin the electron but 200 times more massive, in their experiment at the US Energy Department's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois.

The experiment studied the wobble of muons as they traveled through a magnetic field. The muon, like the electron, has a tiny internal magnet that causes it to wobble - or, technically speaking, "precess" - like the axis of a spinning top while in a magnetic field.

But the wobble's speed, as measured in the experiment, varied considerably from what was predicted based on the Standard Model of particle physics, the theory that explains how the basic building blocks of matter interact, governed by four fundamental forces in the universe.

The new findings, building on data released in 2021, continue to hint at some mysterious factor at play as the researchers try to sort out the discrepancy between the theoretical prediction and the actual experimental results.

"We are looking for an indication that the muon is interacting with something that we do not know about. It could be anything: new particles, new forces, new dimensions, new features of space-time, anything," said Brendan Casey, a senior scientist at Fermilab and one of the authors of a research paper on the findings published in the journal Physical Review Letters.

"I like crazy so I would love this to be something like Lorentz violation or some other new property of space-time itself. That would be insane and revolutionary," Casey added.

Casey was alluding to a principle called Lorentz invariance that holds that the laws of physics are the same everywhere.

"Yes, it is fair to say that it could be pointing to unknown particles or forces," University College London physicist and study co-author Rebecca Chislett said. "Currently due to new results in the theory community, it is difficult to say exactly what the discrepancy between the two (predicted muon behavior and observed behavior) is, but theorists are working hard to resolve this."

The experiment was conducted at minus-450 degrees Fahrenheit (minus-268 degrees Celsius). The researchers shot beams of muons into a donut-shaped superconducting magnetic storage ring measuring 50 feet (15 meters) in diameter. As the muons zipped around the ring traveling nearly the speed of light, they interacted with other subatomic particles that, like tiny dance partners, altered their wobble.

The 2021 results similarly showed an anomalous wobble. The new results were based on quadruple the amount of data, bolstering confidence in the findings.

"With all this new knowledge, the result still agrees with the previous results and this is hugely exciting," Chislett said.

The researchers hope to announce their final findings using all of their collected data in about two years.

"The experiment measures how fast muons spin in a magnetic field. The concept is simple. But to get to the required precision takes years of building the experiment and taking data. We took data from 2018 to 2023. The new result is based on our 2019 and 2020 data," Casey said.

"We have to be patient because we need the Standard Model prediction to catch up to us for us to make the strongest use of our data," Casey added. "We are also very baffled because there are different ways to predict what our experiment should see and they don't agree well. So there is something very fundamental here we must be missing, which is very intriguing."



Japan’s ispace Fails Again: Resilience Lander Crashes on Moon

Staff members and guests react as they watch the progress of Moon landing of Resilience, a Moon lander built by Japan-based startup ispace, during a live event in Tokyo, Japan, early 06 June 2025. (EPA)
Staff members and guests react as they watch the progress of Moon landing of Resilience, a Moon lander built by Japan-based startup ispace, during a live event in Tokyo, Japan, early 06 June 2025. (EPA)
TT
20

Japan’s ispace Fails Again: Resilience Lander Crashes on Moon

Staff members and guests react as they watch the progress of Moon landing of Resilience, a Moon lander built by Japan-based startup ispace, during a live event in Tokyo, Japan, early 06 June 2025. (EPA)
Staff members and guests react as they watch the progress of Moon landing of Resilience, a Moon lander built by Japan-based startup ispace, during a live event in Tokyo, Japan, early 06 June 2025. (EPA)

Japanese company ispace said its uncrewed moon lander likely crashed onto the lunar surface during its touchdown attempt on Friday, marking another failure two years after an unsuccessful inaugural mission.

Tokyo-based ispace had hoped to join US firms Intuitive Machines and Firefly Aerospace in making successful commercial moon landings amid a global race that includes state-run lunar missions from China and India.

Although the failure means another multi-year pause in Japan's commercial access to the moon, the country remains committed to the US-led Artemis program and a wide range of Japanese companies are studying lunar exploration as a business frontier.

Resilience, ispace's second lunar lander, had problems measuring its distance to the surface and could not slow its descent fast enough, the company said, adding it has not been able to communicate with Resilience after a likely hard landing.

"Truly diverse scenarios were possible, including issues with the propulsion system, software or hardware, especially with sensors," ispace Chief Technology Officer Ryo Ujiie told a press conference.

A room of more than 500 ispace employees, shareholders, sponsors and government officials abruptly grew silent when flight data was lost less than two minutes before the scheduled touchdown time during a public viewing event at mission partner Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp in the wee hours in Tokyo.

Shares of ispace were untraded, overwhelmed by sell orders, and looked set to close at the daily limit-low, which would mark a 29% fall. As of the close of Thursday, ispace had a market capitalization of more than 110 billion yen ($766 million).

"We're not facing any immediate financial deterioration or distress because of the event," CFO Jumpei Nozaki said in the press conference, citing recurring investor support.

In 2023, ispace's first lander crashed into the moon's surface due to inaccurate recognition of its altitude. Software remedies have been implemented, while the hardware design was mostly unchanged in Resilience.

$16 MILLION PAYLOAD

Resilience was carrying a four-wheeled rover built by ispace's Luxembourg subsidiary and five external payloads worth a total of $16 million, including scientific instruments from Japanese firms and a Taiwanese university.

The lander had targeted Mare Frigoris, a basaltic plain about 900 km (560 miles) from the moon's north pole.

If the landing had been successful, the 2.3-meter-high lander and the rover would have begun 14 days of planned exploration activities, including capturing of regolith, the moon's fine-grained surface material, on a contract with US space agency NASA.

Resilience in January shared a SpaceX rocket launch with Firefly's Blue Ghost lander, which took a faster trajectory to the moon and touched down successfully in March.

Intuitive Machines, which last year marked the world's first commercial lunar touchdown, also landed its second Athena lander in March, although in a toppled position just as with its first mission.

Japan last year became the world's fifth country to achieve a soft lunar landing after the former Soviet Union, the United States, China and India, when the national Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency achieved the touchdown of its SLIM lander.

The government last year signed an agreement with NASA to include Japanese astronauts in Artemis lunar missions and has supported private companies' research projects for future lunar development, assuming ispace's transportation capabilities.

"Expectations for ispace have not faded," Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said in an X post.

Although ispace will likely remain Japan's most advanced lunar transportation company, some Japanese firms may start to consider transport options from foreign entities to test their lunar exploration visions, said Ritsumeikan University professor Kazuto Saiki, who was involved in the SLIM mission.

For its third mission in 2027, ispace's US unit is building a bigger lander as part of NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services for the Artemis program. The company projects six more missions in the US and Japan through 2029.

"NASA increasingly needs private companies to improve cost efficiency for key missions with limited budgets," ispace CEO Takeshi Hakamada said, referring to US President Donald Trump's proposed budget cuts.

"To meet NASA's expectations, we'll support our US subsidiary to keep up with development and play a role."