US Pet Shop That Sold Sick, Hurt Puppies Will Repay Nearly 200 Customers

By Erin Nolan

The owners of a Long Island pet store accused of knowingly selling hundreds of sick and injured puppies, including some that died days after being bought, will pay $300,000 to about 200 customers under a settlement announced by New York’s attorney general.

The settlement resolves a lawsuit filed by the attorney general, Letitia James, in December 2021 after an investigation by her office determined that the store, Shake A Paw, was acquiring and selling puppies from so-called puppy mills, large-scale commercial breeders with reputations for abuse, inbreeding and filthy conditions.

Ms. James’s inquiry also found that the store and its owners, Marc Jacobs and Gerard O’Sullivan, had failed to disclose animals’ serious medical conditions and had illegally refused to reimburse customers for veterinary bills incurred after they had been sold sick pets, according to court documents.

In addition to repaying the $300,000, Mr. Jacobs and Mr. O’Sullivan agreed to stop the store’s misleading advertising, including claims that puppies sold by Shake A Paw were the “healthiest” and from the “most trusted breeders”; to buy animals only from reputable breeders; and to provide customers with disclosures certifying the health of their puppies, according to court documents.

All pet stores in New York will be prohibited from selling dogs, cats and rabbits starting in December under a law passed in 2022.

The settlement was not an admission of wrongdoing by Shake A Paw, according to a news release provided by Richard Hamburger, a lawyer for the pet store, late Friday night. Shake A Paw would continue to operate in accordance with the law, the news release said, “which is exactly what it has been doing for the past 30 years.”

The agreement marks the end of “an otherwise failed lawsuit” and vindicates Shake A Paw, the news release said, noting that “there was no consumer fraud” and that the store was “released from any claims arising from the sale of more than 22,000 puppies” over an eight-year period.

“Shake A Paw will continue to remain open for business in order to spread joy by uniting adorable puppies with loving New York families,” the release said.

Erin Laxton, who bought her Chihuahua-dachshund mix, Merlin, at Shake A Paw in 2020, described the settlement as a “huge relief.” Ms. Laxton said Merlin had begun coughing the day she brought him home from Shake A Paw and had died of respiratory illnesses five weeks later, according to court documents.

“I feel like I was able to get justice for my poor puppy,” Ms. Laxton said in a statement, adding, “I miss my puppy every day, but I am proud to have been part of this process.”

Shake A Paw has locations in Hicksville and Lynbrook, both of which opened in 1994, according to court documents. Customers paid $2,500 to $8,000 on average for a puppy, along with what the attorney general’s office said were hundreds of dollars of unnecessary additional goods and services.

Ms. James said in the lawsuit that from 2016 to 2021, her office had received 99 complaints from Shake A Paw customers who said they had been sold puppies with serious physical injuries, congenital and hereditary disorders or infectious diseases. Similar complaints were made with the New York Better Business Bureau, according to Ms. James’s office.

One customer’s puppy died six days after a Shake A Paw employee said the pet was “fine,” according to court documents; another was hospitalized for severe double pneumonia just two days after it had been bought. Some customers said they had spent thousands of dollars on veterinary bills in the days and weeks after buying puppies from Shake A Paw, court documents show.

An analysis by the attorney general’s office of over 400 veterinary records of puppies sold by Shake A Paw found that more than half had upper respiratory infections or other breathing problems — both, in some cases — or were infected with parasites.

Shake A Paw also refused to reimburse customers for veterinary care they sought for pets that were already sick when they were sold, Ms. James said in a news release.

Shake A Paw also lied about where it had obtained the puppies it sold. The store claimed on its website that it worked with “the most trusted breeders” and handpicked “the best of the bunch,” but financial records showed that thousands of puppies from known puppy mills had been shipped to Shake A Paw’s owners.

Meaghan Huber bought a three-pound Shih Tzu that she named Mei Mei at Shake A Paw in 2014. She said in an interview on Friday that she was glad the store and its owners were finally being held accountable for the pain they had caused her and others.

Ms. Huber said Mei Mei had begun to have trouble breathing just days after she brought her home. For two years, Mei Mei was in and out of veterinary hospitals being treated for various illnesses and birth defects. She died in Ms. Huber’s arms just before her second birthday.

“It was so horrendous,” Ms. Huber, 35, said of trying to get Shake A Paw to compensate her for selling her a sick puppy.

“Dogs are our children,” she said. “We want the best for them. We did the best for Mei Mei that we could. We loved her with all of our hearts.”

The New York Times

Muddy footprints left on a Kenyan lakeside suggest two of our early human ancestors were nearby neighbors some 1.5 million years ago.
The footprints were left in the mud by two different species “within a matter of hours, or at most days,” said paleontologist Louise Leakey, co-author of the research published Thursday in the journal Science.
Scientists previously knew from fossil remains that these two extinct branches of the human evolutionary tree – called Homo erectus and Paranthropus boisei – lived about the same time in the Turkana Basin.
But dating fossils is not exact. “It’s plus or minus a few thousand years,” said paleontologist William Harcourt-Smith of Lehman College and the American Museum of Natural History in New York, who was not involved in the study.
Yet with fossil footprints, “there’s an actual moment in time preserved,” he said. “It’s an amazing discovery.”
The tracks of fossil footprints were uncovered in 2021 in what is today Koobi Fora, Kenya, said Leaky, who is based at New York's Stony Brook University.
Whether the two individuals passed by the eastern side of Lake Turkana at the same time – or a day or two apart – they likely knew of each other’s existence, said study co-author Kevin Hatala, a paleoanthropologist at Chatham University in Pittsburgh.
“They probably saw each other, probably knew each other was there and probably influenced each other in some way,” The Associated Press quoted him as saying.
Scientists were able to distinguish between the two species because of the shape of the footprints, which holds clues to the anatomy of the foot and how it’s being used.
H. erectus appeared to be walking similar to how modern humans walk – striking the ground heel first, then rolling weight over the ball of the foot and toes and pushing off again.
The other species, which was also walking upright, was moving “in a different way from anything else we’ve seen before, anywhere else,” said co-author Erin Marie Williams-Hatala, a human evolutionary anatomist at Chatham.
Among other details, the footprints suggest more mobility in their big toe, compared to H. erectus or modern humans, said Hatala.
Our common primate ancestors probably had hands and feet adapted for grasping branches, but over time the feet of human ancestors evolved to enable walking upright, researchers say.
The new study adds to a growing body of research that implies this transformation to bipedalism – walking on two feet — didn’t happen at a single moment, in a single way.
Rather, there may have been a variety of ways that early humans learned to walk, run, stumble and slide on prehistoric muddy slopes.
“It turns out, there are different gait mechanics – different ways of being bipedal,” said Harcourt-Smith.

US Pet Shop That Sold Sick, Hurt Puppies Will Repay Nearly 200 Customers