Iran: Scenarios for Nuclear Negotiations after Shamkhani’s Dismissal

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Ali Shamkhani during a government meeting (Mehr News Agency)
Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Ali Shamkhani during a government meeting (Mehr News Agency)
TT

Iran: Scenarios for Nuclear Negotiations after Shamkhani’s Dismissal

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Ali Shamkhani during a government meeting (Mehr News Agency)
Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Ali Shamkhani during a government meeting (Mehr News Agency)

Ali Shamkhani took on the role of Iran’s Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council on September 10, 2013, coinciding with the delegation of nuclear negotiation responsibilities to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

While not directly involved in the nuclear negotiations, Shamkhani served as a crucial link between the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the nuclear negotiating team, playing a pivotal role in advancing the progress of the talks.

Due to his role in the negotiations that resulted in the 2015 nuclear agreement, Shamkhani faced pressure from opponents of the deal, particularly after the talks stalled in September 2022.

In recent days, Iranian officials have discussed the possibility of resuming nuclear negotiations with the US, given the exchange of messages between the two sides.

Iranian news websites have been reporting on potential alterations to the Iranian negotiators’ team, with speculation surrounding the potential comeback of former chief negotiator Abbas Araqchi.

However, the likelihood of a replacement for Shamkhani remains uncertain, although not entirely ruled out.

Shamkhani’s involvement in foreign policy has intensified during the final months of his tenure, fueling speculation about the potential restoration of direct negotiation authority to the Supreme National Security Council.

This remains one of the scenarios under consideration even after Shamkhani's potential replacement.

With Iran’s growing stockpile of 60% enriched uranium, reviving the negotiations remains a strongly considered scenario. This is due to growing Western concerns about the shift in the trajectory of Iran’s nuclear program.

In recent weeks, the risks of a potential military confrontation between Iran and Israel have increased. Israel has informed Western powers that it may launch a unilateral strike on Iranian facilities if Tehran continues enriching uranium at a 60% level.

After US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan hinted at giving Israel the green light in the event of Iran’s proximity to nuclear weapons, Iranian officials have indirectly warned of potential withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

This possibility is also on the table if nuclear negotiations are officially declared unsuccessful, prompting Western powers to trigger the mechanism for the reinstatement of UN sanctions.

Shamkhani’s departure from the Supreme National Security Council is expected to influence nuclear negotiations, particularly with the arrival of influential leader Ali Akbar Ahmadian.

This shift may favor proponents of enhanced Iranian “deterrence,” including the possibility of nuclear weapon production, despite the Iranian Supreme Leader's fatwa against weapons of mass destruction.

 



Pro-Palestinian NGOs Sue Dutch Gov't over Israel Support

A Palestinian flag is removed from a building by Israeli authorities after being put up by an advocacy group that promotes coexistence between Palestinians and Israelis, in Ramat Gan, Israel, Wednesday, June 1, 2022. (AP)
A Palestinian flag is removed from a building by Israeli authorities after being put up by an advocacy group that promotes coexistence between Palestinians and Israelis, in Ramat Gan, Israel, Wednesday, June 1, 2022. (AP)
TT

Pro-Palestinian NGOs Sue Dutch Gov't over Israel Support

A Palestinian flag is removed from a building by Israeli authorities after being put up by an advocacy group that promotes coexistence between Palestinians and Israelis, in Ramat Gan, Israel, Wednesday, June 1, 2022. (AP)
A Palestinian flag is removed from a building by Israeli authorities after being put up by an advocacy group that promotes coexistence between Palestinians and Israelis, in Ramat Gan, Israel, Wednesday, June 1, 2022. (AP)

Pro-Palestinian groups took the Dutch state to court Friday, urging a halt to arms exports to Israel and accusing the government of failing to prevent what they termed a genocide in Gaza.

The NGOs argued that Israel is breaking international law in Gaza and the West Bank, invoking, amongst others, the 1948 United Nations Genocide Convention set up in the wake of the Holocaust.

"Israel is guilty of genocide and apartheid" and "is using Dutch weapons to wage war", said Wout Albers, a lawyer representing the NGOs.

"Dutch weapons are killing children, every day, in Palestine, including my family," said Ahmed Abofoul, a legal advisor to Al Haq, one of the groups involved in the suit, AFP reported.

Israel furiously denies accusations of genocide as it presses on with the offensive in Gaza it began after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel.

Opening the case at the court in The Hague, judge Sonja Hoekstra noted: "It is important to underline that the gravity of the situation in Gaza is not contested by the Dutch State, nor is the status of the West Bank."

"Today is about finding out what is legally in play and what can be expected of the State, if the State can be expected to do more, or act differently than it is currently acting," she added.

She acknowledged this was a "sensitive case", saying: "It's a whole legal debate."

The lawyer for the Dutch State, Reimer Veldhuis, said the Netherlands has been applying European laws in force for arms exports.

Veldhuis argued the case should be tossed out.

"It is unlikely that the minister responsible will grant an arms export licence to Israel that would contribute to the Israeli army's activities in Gaza or the West Bank," said Veldhuis.