Iranian Atomic Organization Refutes Reports of Building Nuclear Site under Natanz Mountains

Head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization Mohammad Eslami on the sidelines of a cabinet meeting. (IRNA)
Head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization Mohammad Eslami on the sidelines of a cabinet meeting. (IRNA)
TT

Iranian Atomic Organization Refutes Reports of Building Nuclear Site under Natanz Mountains

Head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization Mohammad Eslami on the sidelines of a cabinet meeting. (IRNA)
Head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization Mohammad Eslami on the sidelines of a cabinet meeting. (IRNA)

The head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization, Mohammad Eslami, denied what he called “rumors” about building a nuclear site under the Zagros Mountains separating central and western Iran, without mentioning the Natanz facility, after American experts said it was expanding at a greater depth than that of the fortified Fordow complex.

 

The Tasnim news agency, affiliated with the Revolutionary Guard, quoted Eslami as saying that the media reports regarding the construction of the nuclear site under the mountains adjacent to the Natanz facility, are “bogus repetitions that Israel has been saying for years.”

 

He added that whenever Israel finds itself “stuck in difficult situations in the region, it intensifies these psychological operations.”

 

He added that “Iran is working under the IAEA safeguards, and whenever it wants to start new activities, it will coordinate with the IAEA, and act accordingly,” Eslami said, referring to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

 

A report by the Associated Press said that the regime was building a deep underground nuclear facility near the Zagros Mountains in central Iran, close to the Natanz nuclear site, with experts claiming development “is likely beyond the range of a last-ditch US weapon designed to destroy such sites.”

 

Photos and videos from Planet Labs PBC, cited in the report, showed that Iran has been digging tunnels in the mountain near the Natanz nuclear site.

 

A different set of images analyzed by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies reveals that four entrances have been dug into the mountainside, two to the east and another two to the west. Each is 6 meters (20 feet) wide and 8 meters (26 feet) tall.

 

It is not the first time that an underground site has been revealed near the Natanz facility. In January 2021, while US President Joe Biden was preparing to enter the White House, the Washington-based International Institute for Science and Security revealed a set of images taken by the US Maxar satellites.

 

The Institute, which monitors sensitive nuclear activities, said that the authorities were building a new facility under the mountain to accelerate uranium enrichment.

 

Iran said at the time that the new facility would replace a damaged centrifuge manufacturing center.

 

The new Natanz facility is likely to be even deeper underground than Iran’s Fordow complex, according to the AP report.

 

“So the depth of the facility is a concern because it would be much harder for us. It would be much harder to destroy using conventional weapons, such as a typical bunker buster bomb,” Steven De La Fuente, a research associate at the center who led the analysis of the tunnel work, told AP.

 

Israel immediately commented on the report, threatening to launch a decisive strike on Iran if it continues to enrich uranium by more than 60 percent.

 

“This of course limits the capacity to carry out an attack, relative to above-ground facilities, which is of course easier. But what can be said about this matter is that there is nowhere that cannot be reached,” Israeli National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi said, as quoted by Reuters.

 

The Israeli official declined to threaten an explicit Israeli attack and even suggested the onus would be on the United States, by noting that it has massive GBU-43/B bombs which are not in Israel’s arsenal.

 

But he added: “This (underground facility near Natanz) is years away from being completed.”

 



Pro-Palestinian NGOs Sue Dutch Gov't over Israel Support

A Palestinian flag is removed from a building by Israeli authorities after being put up by an advocacy group that promotes coexistence between Palestinians and Israelis, in Ramat Gan, Israel, Wednesday, June 1, 2022. (AP)
A Palestinian flag is removed from a building by Israeli authorities after being put up by an advocacy group that promotes coexistence between Palestinians and Israelis, in Ramat Gan, Israel, Wednesday, June 1, 2022. (AP)
TT

Pro-Palestinian NGOs Sue Dutch Gov't over Israel Support

A Palestinian flag is removed from a building by Israeli authorities after being put up by an advocacy group that promotes coexistence between Palestinians and Israelis, in Ramat Gan, Israel, Wednesday, June 1, 2022. (AP)
A Palestinian flag is removed from a building by Israeli authorities after being put up by an advocacy group that promotes coexistence between Palestinians and Israelis, in Ramat Gan, Israel, Wednesday, June 1, 2022. (AP)

Pro-Palestinian groups took the Dutch state to court Friday, urging a halt to arms exports to Israel and accusing the government of failing to prevent what they termed a genocide in Gaza.

The NGOs argued that Israel is breaking international law in Gaza and the West Bank, invoking, amongst others, the 1948 United Nations Genocide Convention set up in the wake of the Holocaust.

"Israel is guilty of genocide and apartheid" and "is using Dutch weapons to wage war", said Wout Albers, a lawyer representing the NGOs.

"Dutch weapons are killing children, every day, in Palestine, including my family," said Ahmed Abofoul, a legal advisor to Al Haq, one of the groups involved in the suit, AFP reported.

Israel furiously denies accusations of genocide as it presses on with the offensive in Gaza it began after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel.

Opening the case at the court in The Hague, judge Sonja Hoekstra noted: "It is important to underline that the gravity of the situation in Gaza is not contested by the Dutch State, nor is the status of the West Bank."

"Today is about finding out what is legally in play and what can be expected of the State, if the State can be expected to do more, or act differently than it is currently acting," she added.

She acknowledged this was a "sensitive case", saying: "It's a whole legal debate."

The lawyer for the Dutch State, Reimer Veldhuis, said the Netherlands has been applying European laws in force for arms exports.

Veldhuis argued the case should be tossed out.

"It is unlikely that the minister responsible will grant an arms export licence to Israel that would contribute to the Israeli army's activities in Gaza or the West Bank," said Veldhuis.