Bipartisan Congressional Pressure on Biden to Prevent ‘Bad Deal’ with Iran

US President Joe Biden boards the plane upon his return to the White House at San Francisco International Airport. (AFP)
US President Joe Biden boards the plane upon his return to the White House at San Francisco International Airport. (AFP)
TT

Bipartisan Congressional Pressure on Biden to Prevent ‘Bad Deal’ with Iran

US President Joe Biden boards the plane upon his return to the White House at San Francisco International Airport. (AFP)
US President Joe Biden boards the plane upon his return to the White House at San Francisco International Airport. (AFP)

In light of the increasing momentum to revive negotiations between Western capitals and Tehran over the Iranian nuclear program, 26 Democratic and Republican senators have intensified pressure on President Joe Biden’s administration to prevent it from hastily concluding an agreement they fear could be “bad.”

This comes simultaneously with reports of the European-Iranian talks entering a phase of addressing contentious issues related to uranium enrichment levels and cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

These developments coincided with the approval of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the US House of Representatives on a bill that abolishes the so-called “sunset clause” on sanctions imposed since 1996, replacing it with “permanent sanctions” on Iran in order to prevent it from producing any nuclear weapons.

In other news, CNN, quoting a source who requested anonymity, reported on a two-day discussion in Doha between European Union diplomat Enrique Mora and the Iranian top nuclear negotiator, Ali Bagheri-Kani.

Talks focused on key sticking points, including nuclear enrichment levels and Iranian cooperation with the IAEA, the diplomatic source, who was briefed on the matter, told CNN.

Additionally, the source said the talks appear to be “leading to positive developments on many issues.”

“The current environment has been positive for de-escalation,” added the source.

Mora on Twitter described the talks as “intense,” and Kani tweeted earlier that the two had a “serious and constructive meeting on a range of issues, including “negotiations on sanctions lifting” – a key priority for Tehran.

The meeting came a week after Kani met with officials from the signatories to the deal – formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – France, Germany and the UK.

US and Iranian parties resumed indirect talks late last year, with senior US official Brett McGurk traveling multiple times to Oman for indirect discussions with representatives of the Iranian government.

The Biden administration hopes to achieve at least three demands in these negotiations: curtailing Iran’s nuclear program in the field of atomic weapons development, ceasing attacks by the Iranian proxies against US forces in Syria, and releasing three long-held American prisoners in Iran.

As more signs show renewed contacts between Iran and the West, the 26 senators asked Biden not to rush into a bad agreement.

They expressed their concern over reports that the administration is trying to reach a limited nuclear deal with Iran, which it apparently intends to keep out of the US Congress by not signing a formal document.

“It is crucial for your administration to remain aligned with Congressional efforts related to Iran’s nuclear program and not agree to a pact that fails to achieve our nation’s critical interests,” the letter said.



South Korea’s Yoon Defies Second Agency Summons over Martial Law

This handout from the South Korean Presidential Office taken on December 3, 2024 shows South Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol delivering a speech to declare martial law in Seoul. (Handout / South Korean Presidential Office / AFP)
This handout from the South Korean Presidential Office taken on December 3, 2024 shows South Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol delivering a speech to declare martial law in Seoul. (Handout / South Korean Presidential Office / AFP)
TT

South Korea’s Yoon Defies Second Agency Summons over Martial Law

This handout from the South Korean Presidential Office taken on December 3, 2024 shows South Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol delivering a speech to declare martial law in Seoul. (Handout / South Korean Presidential Office / AFP)
This handout from the South Korean Presidential Office taken on December 3, 2024 shows South Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol delivering a speech to declare martial law in Seoul. (Handout / South Korean Presidential Office / AFP)

South Korea's suspended President Yoon Suk Yeol did not respond on Wednesday to a second summons by anti-corruption authorities who, along with prosecutors, are investigating his short-lived martial law decree issued early this month.

Yoon had not appeared for questioning as of 10 a.m. (0100 GMT) on Christmas Day as requested by the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials, after ignoring their first summons last week.

An agency official said it would continue waiting for Yoon on Wednesday, adding it would need to review the case further before seeking an arrest warrant, Yonhap news agency reported.

Yoon also did not respond on Dec. 15 to a separate summons by prosecutors who are investigating the martial law declaration, Yonhap said.

Yoon's repeated defiance of the summons and failures to appear for questioning have sparked criticism and calls from the opposition for his arrest, citing concerns over potential destruction of evidence.

In a televised address on Dec. 7, four days after the martial law declaration, Yoon said he would not evade legal and political responsibility for his actions.

Yoon was impeached by parliament on Dec. 14 over his brief imposition of martial law and must now face a Constitutional Court trial on whether to remove him from office or restore his presidential powers.

Prosecutors, the police and the corruption investigation office have all launched probes into Yoon and other officials, seeking to pursue charges of insurrection, abuse of power or other crimes.

Insurrection is one of the few charges for which a South Korean president does not have immunity.

A lawyer advising Yoon has said he is willing to present his views in person during legal proceedings related to the martial law declaration.