Half of Israelis Believe Govt. is Not Serious about Fighting Crime

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir (AP)
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir (AP)
TT
20

Half of Israelis Believe Govt. is Not Serious about Fighting Crime

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir (AP)
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir (AP)

Israeli officials in the government coalition criticized National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir for “embarrassing the government”, accusing him of causing a global crisis for Israel with his foolish statements.

One of the ministers said that tens of millions of social media followers do not agree with the racist statements that Ben-Gvir made on Wednesday, which showed Israel as an apartheid state.

Ben Gvir said his right to safe movement in the West Bank was more important than the rights of Arabs to free movement.

The US administration and the European Union also condemned the Minister’s statement.

During an interview with Channel 12, Ben-Gvir was asked about the West Bank and his failure to combat violence and crime in Arab society.

“My right, and my wife’s and my children’s right, to get around on the roads in Judea and Samaria is more important than the right to movement for Arabs,” he responded, adding: “That’s the reality. That’s the truth. My right to life comes before their right to movement.”

The boycott Israel movements launched campaigns against Ben-Gvir and various far-right officials who made similar statements or supported apartheid behavior.

Palestinian-US model Bella Hadid slammed Ben-Gvir’s comments and posted the video clip from the interview and shared it on Instagram with her 60 million followers.

"In no place, no time, especially in 2023, should one life be more valuable than another's," said Hadid in the post. "Especially simply because of their ethnicity, culture, or pure hatred."

Ben Gvir's supporters tried to underestimate Hadid's position, saying that she is the daughter of an Arab father from Nazareth, who uses her social media platforms to attack Israel constantly.

MSNBC broadcaster Mehdi Hasan echoed Hadid’s statement, saying: “A top Israeli minister just openly admitted to apartheid.”

Social media was packed with similar positions from all over the world.

-Ongoing protest

The Arab public in Israel continued to protest the escalation of crime and began preparing for a strike in schools and local and municipal councils next week.

They stressed the government is not serious about combating crime and arresting its organizations.

A survey published by the Hebrew newspaper Maariv revealed that there was a significant difference between the positions of Arab and Jewish citizens towards the government's policy regarding crime in Arab society.

Seventy percent of the Arab respondents and 40 percent of the Jewish respondents believe the government does not want to deal with crime in Arab society.

About 39 percent of all respondents believed the government wants to fight crime, but it is not succeeding.

Almost 77 percent of all respondents said they fear that crime in the Arab community will spread to the Jewish community, and 59 percent of the Arabs, compared to 37 percent of the Jews, said they were terrified of this scenario.

A total of 46 percent of the Arabs said the government was responsible for the increase in crime, 18 percent blamed the police, and four percent considered the Arab society to be violent.

On the other hand, 27 percent of the Jews, including 36 percent of the voters of the right-wing coalition parties, considered that the increase in crime is due to the violent Arab society, and 23 percent said that the reason is the government's weak performance.



Trump’s Policy to Deport Activists Is Unconstitutional, Khalil’s Lawyers Say

 Demonstrators hold placards as they protest on the day of a hearing on the detention of Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, in New York City, US, March 12, 2025. (Reuters)
Demonstrators hold placards as they protest on the day of a hearing on the detention of Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, in New York City, US, March 12, 2025. (Reuters)
TT
20

Trump’s Policy to Deport Activists Is Unconstitutional, Khalil’s Lawyers Say

 Demonstrators hold placards as they protest on the day of a hearing on the detention of Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, in New York City, US, March 12, 2025. (Reuters)
Demonstrators hold placards as they protest on the day of a hearing on the detention of Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, in New York City, US, March 12, 2025. (Reuters)

The Trump administration’s policy of deporting some foreign nationals who participate in pro-Palestinian protests is unconstitutional, lawyers for a detained Columbia University student said.

In their first filing since US authorities articulated the legal basis for arresting Mahmoud Khalil, his lawyers urged US District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan to immediately release him from immigration detention because his free speech rights were violated.

"The government’s unlawful policy of targeting noncitizens for arrest and removal based on protected speech is...viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment," Khalil’s lawyers, led by Amy Belsher of the New York Civil Liberties Foundation, wrote in a Thursday night court filing.

A spokesperson for the Justice Department, which is representing the government in court, said in a statement: "Being in the United States as a non-citizen is a privilege, not a right ... Mahmoud won’t be missed."

Khalil’s case has become a flashpoint in Republican President Donald Trump’s pledge to deport some participants in the pro-Palestinian protests that swept US college campuses after Hamas group’s October 2023 attack and Israel’s subsequent military campaign.

Earlier this week, Justice Department lawyers representing the government said Khalil, 30, was subject to deportation because Secretary of State Marco Rubio had determined that his presence or activities in the country could have "serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States."

The provision the government cited in justifying Rubio's ability to declare Khalil deportable is part of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act and has rarely been invoked, legal experts have said, meaning there is little precedent for courts to turn to in determining its constitutionality. Khalil’s lawyers said that statute was not meant to silence dissent.

The government did not elaborate in court papers on how Khalil could harm US foreign policy. Trump, without evidence, has accused him of supporting Hamas, and Rubio told reporters earlier this week that noncitizen protesters who disrupt campus life should have their visas revoked.

In their filing, Khalil's lawyers sought to push back on the Trump administration's portrayal of their client. They called him a "mediator and negotiator" and pointed to a spring 2024 interview with CNN in which he said, "I believe that the liberation of the Palestinian people and the Jewish people are intertwined."

Khalil, who is of Palestinian descent and became a US lawful permanent resident last year, was arrested by Department of Homeland Security agents on Saturday night at his university residence in Manhattan.

The government said he was then brought to an immigration detention center in New Jersey and later flown to Louisiana, where he is currently being held.

Furman has temporarily blocked Khalil’s deportation while his lawyers’ challenge to the legality of his arrest, known as a habeas corpus petition, plays out. Even before the block, there was no indication the student activist’s deportation was imminent.

In a court filing on Friday, Khalil's lawyers said they planned to file a further motion later in the day asking Furman to grant him bail. They said if he continues to be detained, he could miss the birth of his first child. Khalil's wife, an American citizen, is eight months pregnant.

Khalil's case could ultimately test where courts draw the line between protected speech guaranteed to citizens and noncitizens alike under the US Constitution’s First Amendment, and the executive branch’s view that some protests in the US can undermine foreign policy.

Columbia, the epicenter of anti-Israel protests at dozens of US college campuses last spring, has become a prime target of the Trump administration, which has accused it of an inadequate response to antisemitism on campus and allowing Jewish students to be intimidated.

Protest organizers say criticism of Israel’s military assault on Gaza is being wrongly conflated with antisemitism.

Last week, the federal government canceled about $400 million in grants and contracts to Columbia because of what it described as antisemitism.

On Thursday, Department of Homeland Security agents searched two student residences at Columbia pursuant to judicial warrants, its president said, though no one was arrested and no items were removed. The university has expelled some students who occupied a university building during a protest last spring.