Hasina Wins Bangladesh Vote amid Low Turnout

Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina - dpa
Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina - dpa
TT

Hasina Wins Bangladesh Vote amid Low Turnout

Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina - dpa
Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina - dpa

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has won an overwhelming majority in Bangladesh's parliamentary election after a campaign fraught with violence and a boycott from the main opposition party, giving her and her Awami League a fourth consecutive term.

While the Election Commission has been slow to announce the results of Sunday's election, TV stations with journalists across the country reported the Awami League won 224 seats out of 299. Independent candidates took 62, while the Jatiya Party, the third largest in the country, took 11 seats and Kallyan Party got 1. The results for the rest of the constituencies were still coming in.

The election was held in 299 out of 300 parliamentary seats. In one seat, the election was postponed as required by law after an independent candidate died, according to Reuters.

A final official declaration from the Election Commission is expected on Monday.

At least 18 arson attacks preceded the vote but the election day passed in relative calm. Turnout was around 40%, Chief Election Commissioner Kazi Habibul Awal said after the polls closed.

The main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party led by former premier Khaleda Zia refused to accept the election outcome, saying Bangladeshi voters have rejected the government's one-sided election.

Security incidents, including four deaths in an arson attack on a passenger train on Friday, intensified tensions ahead of the election that was shunned by Zia's party and its allied groups. They accuse Hasina of turning Bangladesh into a one-party state and muzzling dissent and civil society.

Authorities blamed much of the violence on the BNP, accusing it of seeking to sabotage the election. On Saturday, detectives arrested seven men belonging to the BNP and its youth wing for their alleged involvement in the train attack. The party denied any role in the incident.



The Pentagon Chief Loses Bid to Reject 9/11 Plea Deals

FILED - 19 March 2024, Rhineland-Palatinate, Ramstein-Miesenbach: US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin speaks during a press conference. Photo: Uwe Anspach/dpa
FILED - 19 March 2024, Rhineland-Palatinate, Ramstein-Miesenbach: US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin speaks during a press conference. Photo: Uwe Anspach/dpa
TT

The Pentagon Chief Loses Bid to Reject 9/11 Plea Deals

FILED - 19 March 2024, Rhineland-Palatinate, Ramstein-Miesenbach: US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin speaks during a press conference. Photo: Uwe Anspach/dpa
FILED - 19 March 2024, Rhineland-Palatinate, Ramstein-Miesenbach: US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin speaks during a press conference. Photo: Uwe Anspach/dpa

A military appeals court has ruled against Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's effort to throw out the plea deals reached for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and two other defendants in the 9/11 attacks, a US official said.

The decision puts back on track the agreements that would have the three men plead guilty to one of the deadliest attacks ever on the United States in exchange for being spared the possibility of the death penalty. The attacks by al-Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on Sept. 11, 2001, and helped spur US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq in what the George W. Bush administration called its war on terror.

The military appeals court released its ruling Monday night, according to the US official, who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, according to The AP.

Military prosecutors and defense attorneys for Mohammed, the accused mastermind of the attacks, and two co-defendants reached the plea agreements after two years of government-approved negotiations. The deals were announced late last summer.

Supporters of the plea agreement see it as a way of resolving the legally troubled case against the men at the US military commission at Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba. Pretrial hearings for Mohammed, Walid bin Attash and Mustafa al-Hawsawi have been underway for more than a decade.

Much of the focus of pretrial arguments has been on how torture of the men while in CIA custody in the first years after their detention may taint the overall evidence in the case.

Within days of news of the plea deal this summer, Austin issued a brief order saying he was nullifying them.

He cited the gravity of the 9/11 attacks in saying that as defense secretary, he should decide on any plea agreements that would spare the defendants the possibility of execution.

Defense lawyers said Austin had no legal authority to reject a decision already approved by the Guantanamo court's top authority and said the move amounted to unlawful interference in the case.

The military judge hearing the 9/11 case, Air Force Col. Matthew McCall, had agreed that Austin lacked standing to throw out the plea bargains after they were underway. That had set up the Defense Department's appeal to the military appeals court.

Austin now has the option of taking his effort to throw out the plea deals to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. There was no immediate word from the Pentagon on any next move.