US Warns China Against Armed Attack on Philippines

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos in Manila (Reuters)
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos in Manila (Reuters)
TT
20

US Warns China Against Armed Attack on Philippines

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos in Manila (Reuters)
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos in Manila (Reuters)

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned China on Tuesday against any “armed attack” against the Philippines and reaffirmed the US “firm” commitment to defend its ally, a reflection of the rising tensions in the region that could potentially embroil Washington in conflict with Beijing.

But in a sign that the United States hopes to de-escalate the situation, Blinken, on a visit to Manila, gave no indication that recent Chinese provocations — which include ramming Philippine vessels and blasting them with water cannons — crossed the threshold of “armed” attacks.

During a joint news conference with his Philippine counterpart, Blinken was asked about China’s “gray-zone coercion tactics,” which include incidents like directing a high-powered laser at a Philippine Coast Guard vessel, temporarily blinding crew members.

He then emphasized the importance of pursuing diplomatic solutions over military responses.

“The very visibility of those actions, I think, has provoked from a number of other countries clear statements in support of the Philippines and against these provocative actions that are a threat to peace, security, freedom of navigation and basic rights under international law,” he said.

“Repeated violations of international law and the rights of the Philippines – water cannons, blocking maneuvers, close shadowing, other dangerous operations – these waterways are critical to the Philippines, to its security, to its economy, but they’re also critical to the interests of the region, the United States, and the world,” Blinken added.

Attempts to Create a Balance

Top US officials have repeatedly said that “an armed attack” against Philippine public vessels, aircraft, armed forces and coastguard would invoke the 1951 US-Philippines mutual defense treaty in which Washington is obliged to defend its ally.

Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos has expressed “great alarm” over the recent confrontations that have sparked diplomatic sparring between Manila and Beijing.

Blinken's visit to Manila is his second since Marcos took office in 2022 and is part of a brief Asia tour to reinforce US support for regional allies against China.

The US Secretary of State appeared to be attempting to strike a balance at a moment when the Biden administration is trying to sustain a recent thaw in relations with Beijing while also standing firm against Chinese territorial aggression in the region.

He was also signaling robust American support for the Philippines at a high-water moment for recent relations between the countries.

Blinken met later on Tuesday with the Philippine president, who has pivoted his country’s foreign policy back toward Washington since succeeding Rodrigo Duterte, who openly derided the United States and embraced Beijing.

Trilateral Summit

Blinken's trip to Manila comes ahead of a trilateral meeting in Washington next month between Biden, Marcos and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida.

Announcing the three-way summit with the Asia-Pacific allies, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said the leaders would push a “shared vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific.”

Ahead of his meetings in the Philippine capital, Blinken toured a semiconductor plant. He described the country as “an increasingly critical partner” in ensuring a “resilient” supply chain of chips.

The United States is seeking to cement its lead in the chip industry both on national security grounds and in the face of competition from China.

The US sees economic as well as strategic benefit in the renewed friendship with the Philippines, which is one of seven countries to receive funding from the 2022 CHIPS act passed by Congress with Biden’s support.

The law authorizes new funding to boost American research and manufacturing of semiconductors and to diversify America’s high-technology supply chain.

Meanwhile, Beijing claims sovereignty over almost the entire South China Sea, ignoring similar requests from other southeast Asian states, including the Philippines. Its sweeping maritime claims were invalidated by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague in 2016, but China has ignored the ruling.

Not a Party

After Blinken's remarks, China said the United States has “no right” to interfere in the South China Sea.

“The United States is not a party to the South China Sea issue and has no right to interfere in maritime issues that are between China and the Philippines,” foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian told a regular press conference.

Also, the Chinese media treated Blinken's visit with disdain.

The Global Times said “Washington's use of Manila as a proxy to disrupt the South China Sea situation could bring regional strategic confrontation to an unprecedented level.”

Beijing has accused Washington of using the Philippines as a "pawn" in the dispute over the South China Sea and various reefs.



Iran Says Talks with US to Focus Solely on Nuclear Issue, Lifting Sanctions

Iranian newspaper front pages on the day of the highest-level Iran-US nuclear talks in years - AFP
Iranian newspaper front pages on the day of the highest-level Iran-US nuclear talks in years - AFP
TT
20

Iran Says Talks with US to Focus Solely on Nuclear Issue, Lifting Sanctions

Iranian newspaper front pages on the day of the highest-level Iran-US nuclear talks in years - AFP
Iranian newspaper front pages on the day of the highest-level Iran-US nuclear talks in years - AFP

Iran's foreign ministry said Sunday that talks with the United States slated for next weekend will remain "indirect" with Omani mediation, and focused solely on the nuclear issue and lifting of sanctions.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff held talks Saturday in Muscat, marking the highest-level Iran-US nuclear negotiations since the collapse of a 2015 accord.

They agreed to meet again in seven days.

"Negotiations will continue to be indirect. Oman will remain the mediator, but we are discussing the location of future negotiations," foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said in an interview with state TV.

He said the talks would only focus on "the nuclear issue and the lifting of sanctions," and that Iran "will not have any talks with the American side on any other issue."

Analysts had said the US would push to include on the agenda discussions over Iran's ballistic missile program along with Tehran's support for the "axis of resistance" -- a network of militant groups opposed to Israel, AFP reported.

Tehran has, however, maintained it will talk only about its nuclear program.

Donald Trump in 2018 pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers during his first term as US president.

He reimposed sweeping economic sanctions against Iran, which continued to adhere to the agreement for a year after Washington's pullout but later began rolling back its own commitments.

Iran has consistently denied seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.

On Sunday, Iranian media largely welcomed the rare talks as a "decisive turning point" in relations between the longtime foes.

Iran's conservative Javan daily praised the US for "not seeking to expand the negotiations to non-nuclear issues".

The government-sponsored newspaper, Iran, described the discussions as "constructive and respectful," quoting Araghchi.

Meanwhile, the reformist Shargh newspaper said it was a "decisive turning point" in Iran-US relations.

The hardline Kayhan newspaper, which was largely sceptical in the days leading up to the talks, lamented that Iran does not have a "plan B" while there was "no clear prospect for an agreement with Donald Trump."

It, however, lauded the fact that the American side did not bring up "the dismantling of nuclear facilities" and "the possibility of a military attack" during the discussions.