‘MAHSA’ Act Advances in US Senate

 A woman carrying a picture of the Iranian activist Mahsa Amini in Brussels last September (AFP)
A woman carrying a picture of the Iranian activist Mahsa Amini in Brussels last September (AFP)
TT

‘MAHSA’ Act Advances in US Senate

 A woman carrying a picture of the Iranian activist Mahsa Amini in Brussels last September (AFP)
A woman carrying a picture of the Iranian activist Mahsa Amini in Brussels last September (AFP)

After more than 7 months of approval in the House of Representatives, the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee announced it will discuss the Mahsa Amini Human rights and Security Accountability Act (MAHSA Act) on April 16.

The bipartisan legislation passed the House of Representatives with overwhelming majority in September 2023, but has not yet been moved forward for a vote in the Senate.

It is named after the 22-year-old Kurdish-Iranian girl whose death in police custody in September 2022 sparked country-wide protests, challenging the Iranian regime like never before.

Chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ben Cardin decided to put the bill on the agenda after previously holding back.

This move was welcomed by supporters of the bill, like Republican Representative Jim Banks, who urged for its vote to honor Amini’s memory and hold Iran accountable for human rights abuses.

Banks urged Chuck Schumer, the current Senate majority leader, to put the bill to vote in the Senate.

In a post on “X,” he highlighted two main points: the sanctions mentioned in the legislation and the upcoming steps and challenges.

The MAHSA Act, passed overwhelmingly by the House of Representatives with 410 votes, urges the US government to impose sanctions on top Iranian figures, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Ebrahim Raisi, for human rights violations and supporting terrorism.

The bill requires the Biden administration to impose these sanctions within 90 days and freeze the assets of Iranian officials involved in human rights abuses.

Republican House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Mike McCaul criticized the Biden administration for not applying existing sanction laws against Iranian officials despite their roles in human rights violations.

He also accused the administration of pursuing a political agenda in dealing with Iran, cautioning against sacrificing the Iranian people’s interests for a flawed nuclear deal.

These criticisms have raised doubts about the Biden administration’s willingness to sign such legislation.

Banks urged Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to put the bill to a vote in the Senate.

While its discussion in the committee is important for party unity, it doesn’t guarantee a vote. The final decision rests with Schumer, who hasn’t revealed his stance yet.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee may propose amendments during the expected debate on the bill. This means the final version will differ from the House's.

Hence, the House will need to vote again to align the text before sending it to the White House for the President’s signature.

Additionally, the committee will discuss two more bills to impose extra sanctions on Iran: one targeting the oil sector and the other aimed at the drone and missile program and its exporters.



Reactions to the ICC warrants

An exterior view of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, Netherlands, 21 November 2024. EPA/REMKO DE WAAL
An exterior view of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, Netherlands, 21 November 2024. EPA/REMKO DE WAAL
TT

Reactions to the ICC warrants

An exterior view of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, Netherlands, 21 November 2024. EPA/REMKO DE WAAL
An exterior view of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, Netherlands, 21 November 2024. EPA/REMKO DE WAAL

These are reactions to the International Criminal Court arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and Hamas commander Ibrahim al-Masri, who is believed to be dead.

The warrants are for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, and Israel's military campaign in Gaza since then.

ISRAEL:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office:
"Israel rejects with disgust the absurd and false actions leveled against it by ICC," the office said, calling the move antisemitic.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog:
"The decision chose the side of terrorism and evil over democracy and freedom and turned the international justice system itself into a human shield for Hamas' crimes against humanity."

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar:
"A dark moment for the International Criminal Court," Saar said, adding the court had "lost all legitimacy" and adding that it had issued "absurd orders without authority".

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid:
"Israel defends its life against terrorist organizations that attacked, murdered and raped our citizens, these arrest warrants are a reward for terrorism."

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich:
"Israel will continue to defend its citizens and its security with determination," he said, urging Netanyahu to sever contact with the court and impose sanctions on the Palestinian Authority and its leaders "to the point of its collapse".

Israeli Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir:
"The International Criminal Court in The Hague shows once again that it is antisemitic through and through."

PALESTINIANS:

Hamas official statement:
"We call on the International Criminal Court to expand the scope of accountability to all criminal occupation leaders."

Senior Hamas official Basem Naim:
"This is an important step on the path to justice and bringing justice to the victims but it remains a limited and spiritual step if it is not backed practically by all countries."

UNITED STATES:
Republican US Senator Lindsey Graham, a close ally of President-elect Trump: "The Court is a dangerous joke. It is now time for the US Senate to act and sanction this irresponsible body."

EUROPE:
EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said the ICC warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant are not political and the court decision should be respected and implemented.

Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp told parliament, "The Netherlands obviously respects the independence of the ICC," adding: "We won't engage in non-essential contacts and we will act on the arrest warrants. We fully comply with the Rome Statute of the ICC," he added.

France's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Christophe Lemoine said the French reaction to the warrants would be "in line with ICC statutes" but declined to say whether France would arrest the leader if he came to the country. "It's a point that is legally complex," he said.

Norway's Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide said, "It is important that the ICC carries out its mandate in a judicious manner. I have confidence that the court will proceed with the case based on the highest fair trial standards."

Ireland's Prime Minister Simon Harris called the warrants "an extremely significant step" and added that Ireland respects the role of the ICC and anyone in a position to assist it in carrying out its vital work must do so "with urgency".

MIDDLE EAST:
Jordan's Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said the ICC rulings should be respected and implemented, adding that "Palestinians deserve justice".