Iran Vows Israel Retaliation, Complains to Security Council Over Consulate Strike

A banner distributed by the propaganda office affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards threatens to liquidate Israeli army leaders (AFP)
A banner distributed by the propaganda office affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards threatens to liquidate Israeli army leaders (AFP)
TT

Iran Vows Israel Retaliation, Complains to Security Council Over Consulate Strike

A banner distributed by the propaganda office affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards threatens to liquidate Israeli army leaders (AFP)
A banner distributed by the propaganda office affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards threatens to liquidate Israeli army leaders (AFP)

Iran has vowed to retaliate against Israel for bombing its consulate in Damascus, which killed seven top officers of the Revolutionary Guards, including Mohammad Reza Zahedi, the commander of the Quds Force in Syria and Lebanon.

This raises fears of more violence after this unprecedented attack.

Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei mourned Zahedi and his deputy, Mohammad Hadi Haj Rahim, and promised that Israel would regret its actions.

Iranian media shared a photo of the consulate’s entrance, confirming the attack.

The death toll has reached 13, including seven Revolutionary Guards members.

Iran’s ambassador to Syria, who had been working at the nearby embassy, said the consulate in the Syrian capital had been hit by six missiles launched by F-35 jets.

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi condemned the attack, promising a response. A statement from the Supreme National Security Council assured that necessary decisions have been made.

Moreover, Iran’s UN mission called on the Security Council to strongly condemn the attack, describing it as a serious threat to regional peace.

Iran also stated its right to respond decisively. The strike was criticized as a clear violation of international law and the principle of diplomatic premises’ inviolability.

The conflict in the Middle East has been escalating since the Gaza war began in October. Israel has been carrying out airstrikes for years, targeting Iranian interests or groups supported by Iran. However, Monday's attack in Damascus was one of the boldest yet.

While Tehran avoids direct conflict with Israel, it has backed attacks on Israeli, US, and Red Sea commercial targets.

Israel has not claimed responsibility for the attack, which destroyed a consulate building near the main Iranian embassy.

According to a senior Israeli official, the targets were involved in previous attacks on Israeli and US assets and were planning more.

Four unnamed Israeli officials admitted Israel's involvement in the attack, as reported by The New York Times.

According to Axios, which cited a US official, Washington informed Iran that it “had no involvement” or advance knowledge of an Israeli strike on the diplomatic compound in Syria.

Threats to retaliate against Israel have raised questions within Iran about what form the response might take.

Vahid Jalalzadeh, head of Iran’s parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, mentioned that Iran will respond “at the right time and place” but didn't specify further.

Observers, however, downplay the likelihood of a direct clash between Iran and Israel.



Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
TT

Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)

Iran on Saturday hinted it would be willing to negotiate on a nuclear agreement with the upcoming administration of US President-elect Donald Trump, but that it has conditions.
Last Thursday, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a “comprehensive” report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.
Ali Larijani, advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said Iran and the US are now in a new position concerning the nuclear file.
In a post on X, he said, “If the current US administration say they are only against Iran’s nuclear weapons, they must accept Iran’s conditions and provide compensation for the damages caused.”

He added, “The US should accept the necessary conditions... so that a new agreement can be reached.”
Larijani stated that Washington withdrew from the JCPOA, thus causing damage to Iran, adding that his country started increasing its production of 60% enriched uranium.
The Iran nuclear accord, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was reached to limit the Iranian nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
The deal began unraveling in 2018, when Washington, under Trump’s first administration, unilaterally withdrew from the accord and re-imposed a sanction regime of “maximum pressure” on Tehran.
In retaliation, Iran has rapidly ramped up its nuclear activities, including by increasing its stockpiles of enriched uranium to 60% — close to the 90% threshold required to develop a nuclear bomb.
It also began gradually rolling back some of its commitments by increasing its uranium stockpiles and enriching beyond the 3.67% purity -- enough for nuclear power stations -- permitted under the deal.
Since 2021, Tehran has significantly decreased its cooperation with the IAEA by deactivating surveillance devices to monitor the nuclear program and barring UN inspectors.
Most recently, Iran escalated its confrontations with the Agency by announcing it would launch a series of “new and advanced” centrifuges. Its move came in response to a resolution adopted by the United Nations nuclear watchdog that censures Tehran for what the agency called lack of cooperation.
Centrifuges are the machines that enrich uranium transformed into gas by rotating it at very high speed, increasing the proportion of fissile isotope material (U-235).
Shortly after the IAEA passed its resolution last Thursday, Tehran spoke about the “dual role” of IAEA’s chief, Raphael Grossi.
Chairman of the Iranian Parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, Ebrahim Azizi said, “The statements made by Grossi in Tehran do not match his actions in Vienna.”
And contrary to the statements of Azizi, who denied his country’s plans to build nuclear weapons, Tehran did not originally want to freeze its uranium stockpile enriched to 60%
According to the IAEA’s definition, around 42 kg of uranium enriched to 60% is the amount at which creating one atomic weapon is theoretically possible. The 60% purity is just a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
Spokesperson and deputy head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Behrouz Kamalvandi, said on Friday that IAEA inspectors were scheduled to come immediately after the meeting of the Board of Governors to evaluate Iran’s capacity, “with those capacities remaining for a month without any interruption in enrichment at 60% purity.”
Iran’s news agency, Tasnim, quoted Kamalvandi as saying that “the pressures resulting from the IAEA resolution are counterproductive, meaning that they increase our ability to enrich.”
He added: “Currently, not only have we not stopped enrichment, but we have orders to increase the speed, and we are gradually working on that."