State Department Official Resigns Over US Policy in Gaza

US State Department offices in Washington (Reuters)
US State Department offices in Washington (Reuters)
TT

State Department Official Resigns Over US Policy in Gaza

US State Department offices in Washington (Reuters)
US State Department offices in Washington (Reuters)

A senior US State Department official resigned this week over disagreements with a newly published report by the Biden administration concluding Israel was not blocking aid into Gaza.

Meanwhile, recent analyses revealed that munitions manufactured in the US were used in the deadly Israeli airstrike Sunday on a displacement camp in the Gaza Strip's southernmost city of Rafah.

Despite these developments, US officials still refuse to say Israel had crossed a red line set weeks ago by US President Joe Biden who had warned the Israeli government of Benjamin Nentanyahu from invading Rafah. But the Israeli Prime Minister didn't heed the US warning.

This week, the resignation of Stacy Gilbert adds to a list of State Department officials who quit the administration in protest at Biden’s support for Israel.

Josh Paul, the director of congressional and public affairs for the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, and Hala Rharrit, the Arabic Language Spokesperson for the State Department, in addition to several State Department employees, have resigned over the US support for Tel Aviv.

Gilbert sent an e-mail to the State Department employees, saying the department report that Israel did not obstruct aid to Gaza was incorrect.

State Department spokesman Matthew Miller declined to discuss Gilbert's resignation. But he said the US administration welcomes diverse viewpoints.

Later, in a LinkedIn post, Josh Paul, who was the first State Department official to quit in protest against US support for Israel, welcomed Gilbert’s departure.

“On the day when the White House announced that the latest atrocity in Rafah did not cross its red line, this resignation demonstrates that the Biden Administration will do anything to avoid the truth,” he wrote.

Paul added, “But this is not just a story of bureaucratic complicity or ineptitude - there are people signing off on arms transfers, people drafting arms transfer approval memos, people turning a blind eye.”

He also spoke about people “who could be speaking up, people who have an immense responsibility to do good, and a lifelong commitment to human rights - whose choice is to let the bureaucracy function as though it were business as usual.”

In February, Biden issued a national security memorandum (NSM-20) on whether the administration finds credible Israel's assurances that its use of US weapons does not violate either US or international law.

Lately, the administration paused a shipment of weapons, including some bombs and precision-guided equipment, to Israel in opposition to apparent moves by its forces to invade Rafah.

However, despite the rising death toll and increased military operations, the administration kept the flow of most weapons unchanged, declaring that Israel's actions in the crowded border city of Rafah have still not crossed the "red line" set by Biden.

Meanwhile, analysis published by CNN on Wednesday revealed that munitions made in the United States were used in the deadly Israeli strike on a displacement camp in Rafah on Sunday.

At least 45 people were killed and more than 250 others injured after a fire broke out following the Israeli army’s strike on the outskirts of the city, most of them women and children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry and Palestinian medics.

In video shared on social media, which CNN geolocated to the same scene by matching details including the camp’s entrance sign and the tiles on the ground, the tail of a US-made GBU-39 small diameter bomb (SDB) is visible, according to four explosive weapons experts who reviewed the video for CNN.

The GBU-39, which is manufactured by Boeing, is a high-precision munition “designed to attack strategically important point targets,” and result in low collateral damage, explosive weapons expert Chris Cobb-Smith told the channel on Tuesday.



Trump Administration Cancels Travel for Refugees Already Cleared to Resettle in the US

 An Afghan refugee man, who asked not to use his name and not to show his face fearing his identity could lead to his capture, speaks during an interview with The Associated Press, in Islamabad, Pakistan, Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2025. (AP)
An Afghan refugee man, who asked not to use his name and not to show his face fearing his identity could lead to his capture, speaks during an interview with The Associated Press, in Islamabad, Pakistan, Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2025. (AP)
TT

Trump Administration Cancels Travel for Refugees Already Cleared to Resettle in the US

 An Afghan refugee man, who asked not to use his name and not to show his face fearing his identity could lead to his capture, speaks during an interview with The Associated Press, in Islamabad, Pakistan, Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2025. (AP)
An Afghan refugee man, who asked not to use his name and not to show his face fearing his identity could lead to his capture, speaks during an interview with The Associated Press, in Islamabad, Pakistan, Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2025. (AP)

Refugees who had been approved to travel to the United States before a deadline next week suspending America's refugee resettlement program have had their travel plans canceled by the Trump administration.

Thousands of refugees who fled war and persecution and had gone through a sometimes yearslong process to start new lives in America are now stranded at various locations worldwide. That includes more than 1,600 Afghans who assisted America's war effort, as well as relatives of active-duty US military personnel.

President Donald Trump paused the refugee resettlement program this week as part of a series of executive orders cracking down on immigration. His move had left open the possibility that refugees who had been screened to come to the US and had flights booked before the Jan. 27 deadline might be able to get in under the wire.

But in an email dated Tuesday and reviewed by The Associated Press, the US agency overseeing refugee processing and arrivals told staff and stakeholders that "refugee arrivals to the United States have been suspended until further notice."

There are a little more than 10,000 refugees from around the world who had already gone through the lengthy refugee admission process and had travel scheduled over the next few weeks, according to a document obtained by the AP. It was not immediately clear how many of those had been set to arrive by upcoming deadline.

Among those are more than 1,600 Afghans cleared to come to the US as part of the program that the Biden administration set up after the American withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

Many veterans of America's longest war have tried for years to help Afghans they worked with, in addition to their families, find refuge in the US. Many were prepared for a suspension of the resettlement program but had hoped for special consideration for the Afghans.

"The Trump administration’s early pause of refugee flights is alarming, leaving thousands of Afghan allies in fear and uncertainty," said Shawn VanDiver, a Navy veteran and head of #AfghanEvac, a coalition supporting Afghan resettlement efforts. "We are ready to partner to fix this and urge clear communication with impacted families. Let’s honor our promises and uphold America’s values."

There is a separate path — the special immigrant visa program— specifically for Afghans who worked directly with the US government. VanDiver's group said that program, set up by Congress, did not appear to be affected at this time.

Trump's order signed Monday had given the State Department a week before it began to halt all processing and traveling. It appears the timing was moved up, though it was not immediately clear what prompted the change.

The State Department referred questions to the White House.

Agencies that help refugees settle and adjust to life in America have argued that this is the type of legal immigration that Trump and his supporters say they like and have pointed to the stringent background checks and sometimes yearslong wait that refugees endure before setting foot in America.

"This abrupt halt to refugee admissions is devastating for families who have already endured unimaginable hardship and waited years for the chance to rebuild their lives in safety," Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, head of Global Refuge, one of the 10 US resettlement agencies, said in a statement Wednesday.

"Refugees go through one of the most rigorous vetting processes in the world, and many are now seeing their travel canceled just days, or even hours, before they were set to begin their new lives in the United States," she said. "It’s utterly heartbreaking."

Refugees are distinct from people who come directly to the US-Mexico border with the goal of eventually seeking asylum. Refugees must be living outside of the US to be considered for resettlement and are usually referred to the State Department by the United Nations.

While the resettlement program has historically enjoyed bipartisan support, the first Trump administration also temporarily halted resettlement and then lowered the number of refugees who could enter the country annually.