Russia Warns the United States of the Risks of World War Three

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attends a press conference with Yemen's foreign minister after their meeting in Moscow, Russia, 27 August 2024. (EPA)
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attends a press conference with Yemen's foreign minister after their meeting in Moscow, Russia, 27 August 2024. (EPA)
TT

Russia Warns the United States of the Risks of World War Three

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attends a press conference with Yemen's foreign minister after their meeting in Moscow, Russia, 27 August 2024. (EPA)
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attends a press conference with Yemen's foreign minister after their meeting in Moscow, Russia, 27 August 2024. (EPA)

Russia said the West was playing with fire by considering allowing Ukraine to strike deep into Russia with Western missiles and cautioned the United States on Tuesday that World War Three would not be confined to Europe.

Ukraine attacked Russia's western Kursk region on Aug. 6 and has carved out a slice of territory in the biggest foreign attack on Russia since World War Two. President Vladimir Putin said there would be a worthy response from Russia to the attack.

Sergei Lavrov, who has served as Putin's foreign minister for more than 20 years, said that the West was seeking to escalate the Ukraine war and was "asking for trouble" by considering Ukrainian requests to loosen curbs on using foreign-supplied weapons.

Since invading Ukraine in 2022, Putin has repeatedly warned of the risk of a much broader war involving the world's biggest nuclear powers, though he has said Russia does not want a conflict with the US-led NATO alliance.

"We are now confirming once again that playing with fire - and they are like small children playing with matches - is a very dangerous thing for grown-up uncles and aunts who are entrusted with nuclear weapons in one or another Western country," Lavrov told reporters in Moscow.

"Americans unequivocally associate conversations about Third World War as something that, God forbid, if it happens, will affect Europe exclusively," Lavrov said.

Lavrov added that Russia was "clarifying" its nuclear doctrine.

Russia's 2020 nuclear doctrine sets out when its president would consider using a nuclear weapon: broadly as a response to an attack using nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction or conventional weapons "when the very existence of the state is put under threat".

RUSSIA'S RESPONSE

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said earlier this month that the assault on Russia's Kursk region showed that Kremlin threats of retaliation were a bluff.

Zelenskiy said Ukraine, because of the restrictions imposed by allies, could not use the weapons at its disposal to hit some Russian military targets. He urged allies to be bolder in their decisions about how to help Kyiv in the war.

Russia has said that Western weaponry, including British tanks and US rocket systems, have been used by Ukraine in Kursk. Kyiv has confirmed using US HIMARS missiles to take out bridges in Kursk.

Washington says it was not informed about Ukraine's plans ahead of the surprise incursion into Kursk. The United States has also said it did not take any part in the operation.

Putin's foreign intelligence chief, Sergei Naryshkin, said on Tuesday that Moscow did not believe Western assertions that it had nothing to do with the Kursk attack. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said the involvement of the United States was "an obvious fact".

The New York Times reported that the United States and Britain provided Ukraine with satellite imagery and other information about the Kursk region in the days after the Ukrainian attack.

The Times said that the intelligence was aimed at helping Ukraine keep better track of Russian reinforcements.



Iran Divided Over Araghchi’s Call for New Nuclear Talks

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. (AFP)
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. (AFP)
TT

Iran Divided Over Araghchi’s Call for New Nuclear Talks

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. (AFP)
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. (AFP)

Iranian newspapers are split over the first comments made by new Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi about the 2015 nuclear deal and whether it can be revived to lift US sanctions.

On Sunday, Araghchi denied that the deal between Iran and world powers is “dead,” walking back from earlier comments suggesting the agreement was finished and needed new negotiations.

His remarks came in his first TV interview after taking office last Wednesday.

The nuclear deal fell apart after former US President Donald Trump withdrew from it in 2018, criticizing it for not addressing Iran's regional activities, especially its ballistic missile program.

In response, Iran gradually stopped complying with the deal, including significantly increasing uranium enrichment after President Joe Biden took office.

Efforts by the Biden administration to revive the deal failed after six rounds of negotiations in Vienna, led by Araghchi, and further talks with Iran’s previous government.

The diplomatic process stalled further with the Ukraine war and Iran’s growing isolation after mass protests in September 2022.

During his election campaign, President Masoud Pezeshkian promised to lift sanctions and improve living conditions, criticizing a 2020 law that allowed Iran to further pull away from the deal.

However, after winning the elections, Pezeshkian, and former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, pledged to follow domestic laws in any negotiations.

Araghchi, too, affirmed his commitment to these laws in parliament and noted that reviving the nuclear talks would be harder now due to changing international conditions, such as the Ukraine war and conflict in Gaza.

He suggested that if the deal is to be revived, it would need amendments, which would be challenging.

Later, Araghchi clarified that his comments did not mean the deal was dead and that Iran would continue negotiations, consulting with other parties to protect Iranian interests.

His remarks came after phone calls with his counterparts in France, Germany, the UK, and the EU’s foreign policy chief.

The reformist newspaper Sazandegi reported that Araghchi told European officials the current deal couldn’t be revived without changes.

Meanwhile, the hardline Khorasan daily highlighted the challenges Araghchi faces, including the expiration of a related UN Security Council resolution in October.

The newspaper Farhikhtegan, linked to a top adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader, questioned the value of new negotiations.

An analyst suggested that Iran's foreign policy remains consistent despite government changes, with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei having the final say.

The reformist Arman-e Melli newspaper accused opponents of the deal of distracting from Araghchi's comments and suggested that the new government would pursue national interests if not obstructed.

Some lawmakers who previously opposed the deal now support reviving talks, but one political analyst argued that the deal is effectively dead and cannot be brought back.