Bangladesh Ramps up Border Vigilance as Thousands of Rohingya Flee Myanmar 

Rohingya refugee children play football at a refugee camp in Ukhia on September 10, 2024. (AFP)
Rohingya refugee children play football at a refugee camp in Ukhia on September 10, 2024. (AFP)
TT

Bangladesh Ramps up Border Vigilance as Thousands of Rohingya Flee Myanmar 

Rohingya refugee children play football at a refugee camp in Ukhia on September 10, 2024. (AFP)
Rohingya refugee children play football at a refugee camp in Ukhia on September 10, 2024. (AFP)

Bangladesh has ramped up vigilance at its border with Myanmar, with at least 18,000 Rohingya Muslims crossing over in recent months to escape escalating violence in Myanmar's western Rakhine state, officials in Dhaka said.

The influx of refugees from Myanmar has mounted as fighting escalates between the troops of the ruling junta and the Arakan Army, the powerful ethnic militia that recruits from the Buddhist majority.

"Thousands of Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh and many are waiting to cross. The situation is dire," said a foreign ministry official, who asked not to be named as he was not authorized to talk to media.

The new arrivals add to more than one million Rohingya refugees already living in overcrowded camps in Cox's Bazar district after they fled a military-led crackdown in Myanmar in 2017. They have little hope of returning to Myanmar, where they are largely denied citizenship and other basic rights.

Arrivals have more than doubled from what the government estimated earlier this month, despite Bangladesh repeatedly saying it cannot accept more Rohingya refugees as resources are already stretched thin.

"The vigilance at the border has increased, but managing our 271 km (168 miles) border with Myanmar is challenging, especially without a security counterpart on the other side," said another government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The official said many Rohingya were desperate and were finding ways to cross into Bangladesh.

The government has yet to make a decision on whether to register those who have entered recently and are living in refugee camps, said the foreign ministry official.

"If we decide to register them, it could open the floodgates, and that's something we can't afford," he said. "But at the same time, how long can we ignore this issue? That's the real question."

The head of Bangladesh's interim government, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus, has called for a fast-tracked third-country resettlement of Rohingya as a long-term solution, but the foreign ministry official said progress on resettlement has been limited.

"Around 2,000 people have gone under the resettlement program since it resumed in 2022 after a gap of 12 years," he said, adding that the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Ireland were among countries taking in refugees.



Some Undecided Voters Not Convinced by Harris After Debate with Trump 

A man holds a Harris-Walz flag as supporters of Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris attend a watch party during the US Presidential debate between Harris and former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in in Nashville, Tennessee, on September 10, 2024. (AFP)
A man holds a Harris-Walz flag as supporters of Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris attend a watch party during the US Presidential debate between Harris and former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in in Nashville, Tennessee, on September 10, 2024. (AFP)
TT

Some Undecided Voters Not Convinced by Harris After Debate with Trump 

A man holds a Harris-Walz flag as supporters of Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris attend a watch party during the US Presidential debate between Harris and former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in in Nashville, Tennessee, on September 10, 2024. (AFP)
A man holds a Harris-Walz flag as supporters of Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris attend a watch party during the US Presidential debate between Harris and former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in in Nashville, Tennessee, on September 10, 2024. (AFP)

Kamala Harris was widely seen as dominating Tuesday's presidential debate against Republican former president Donald Trump, but a group of undecided voters remained unconvinced that the Democratic vice president was the better candidate.

Reuters interviewed 10 people who were still unsure how they were going to vote in the Nov. 5 election before they watched the debate. Six said afterward they would now either vote for Trump or were leaning toward backing him. Three said they would now back Harris and one was still unsure how he would vote.

Harris and Trump are in a tight race and the election will likely be decided by just tens of thousands of votes in a handful of battleground states, many of whom are swing voters like the undecided voters who spoke to Reuters.

Although the sample size was small, the responses suggested Harris might need to provide more detailed policy proposals to win over voters who have yet to make up their minds.

Five said they found Harris vague during the more than 90-minute debate on how she would improve the US economy and deal with the high cost of living, a top concern for voters.

The encounter was particularly important for Harris, with a weekend New York Times/Siena College opinion poll showing that more than a quarter of likely voters feel they do not know enough about her, in contrast to the well-known Trump.

The Trump converts said they trusted him more on the economy, even though all said they did not like him as a person. They said their personal financial situation had been better when he was president between 2017-2021. Some singled out his proposal to tax foreign imports, although economists say that is likely to raise prices.

Four of those six also said Harris did not convince them she would pursue different economic policies than Democratic President Joe Biden, a Democrat they largely blame for the high cost of living.

"I still don't know what she is for," said Mark Kadish, 61, an entrepreneur in Florida. "There was no real meat and bones for her plans."

Four of the voters are women and six are men; eight are white and two are Black. All have voted for both Democratic and Republican candidates in the past.

Harris did mention some policy specifics, including her plan to offer tax benefits to families and small businesses. But she focused much of the debate on attacking Trump rather than laying out detailed policies.

Robert Wheeler, 48, a security firm executive in Nevada, was leaning toward Harris before the debate. He now says if the election were held tomorrow, he would vote for Trump, largely because he thought Harris didn't provide clarity on her policies.

"I felt like the whole debate was Kamala Harris telling me why not to vote for Donald Trump instead of why she's the right candidate," Wheeler said.

But Meredith Marshall, who is self-employed and lives in Los Angeles, said she was now for Harris. She said she had hoped to hear more about the economy from the vice president, but still liked her plan to help small business owners.