Trump, Zelenskyy Meet in New York amid Rising Questions about US Support for Ukraine

(L-R) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Republican presidential nominee, former US President Donald Trump, shake hands during a meeting on September 27, 2024 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)
(L-R) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Republican presidential nominee, former US President Donald Trump, shake hands during a meeting on September 27, 2024 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Trump, Zelenskyy Meet in New York amid Rising Questions about US Support for Ukraine

(L-R) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Republican presidential nominee, former US President Donald Trump, shake hands during a meeting on September 27, 2024 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)
(L-R) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Republican presidential nominee, former US President Donald Trump, shake hands during a meeting on September 27, 2024 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met face-to-face with Donald Trump on Friday with public tensions rising between the two over Ukraine's defense against Russia's invasion and in the midst of the US presidential election.

“We both want to see this end, and we both want to see a fair deal made,” Trump told Fox News while standing alongside Zelenskyy after meeting for 40 minutes. “The president wants it to end, and he wants it to end as quickly as possible. He wants a fair transaction to take place.”

Zelenskyy said the war shouldn't have started and added that there needs to be pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin and peace for the families of those killed.

“We need to do everything to pressure him to stop this war. He is in our territory. That's most important to understand. He is in our territory.”

The meeting came at a critical time in the Russia-Ukraine war as Election Day nears in the US Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent, have taken sharply different approaches to Ukraine. Zelenskyy has been eager to keep good relations with the United States, his country's largest provider of arms and money for the war. But the future of that support would be in doubt if Trump were to win the election.

Trump, who has touted his good relationship with Putin and called the Russian leader “pretty smart” for invading Ukraine, has for months criticized US support for Ukraine and derided Zelenskyy as a “salesman” for persuading Washington to provide weapons and funding to his military as it tries to fend off Moscow.

On Friday, Trump brought up his first impeachment, which Democrats in Congress pursued after he asked Zelenskyy for a “favor” — that he investigate Joe Biden, now the president, and Biden’s son Hunter, who served on the board of a Ukrainian gas company.

At the time Trump asked for the “favor,” he was withholding $400 million in military aid to Ukraine as it fought Russian-backed separatists on its eastern boundary. He was later acquitted of the impeachment charges by a Republican-led Senate.

“He could have grandstanded and played cute,” Trump said. “And he didn't do that. He said, ‘President Trump did absolutely nothing wrong.’ He said it loud and clear.”

Zelenskyy told reporters in October 2019, as Congress was launching its impeachment inquiry, that there was “no blackmail” from Trump. He also told reporters, “I don’t want to interfere in any way in the elections,” trying to publicly and privately distance himself then from US domestic politics.

But The Associated Press reported afterward that, despite Zelenskyy’s denials, US officials were aware he was feeling pressure from the Trump administration to investigate Biden even before his phone call with Trump regarding the “favor.”

Friday's meeting almost wasn't scheduled despite Zelenskyy’s office saying something had been planned during the Ukrainian leader’s visit to the UN General Assembly, during which he is making his endgame pitch to allies.

In an interview with The New Yorker that was published earlier this week, Zelenskyy implied Trump does not understand and oversimplifies the conflict. The Ukrainian leader said Trump's running mate, Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, was “too radical” and has essentially advocated for Ukraine to “make a sacrifice” by “giving up its territories.”

Trump ripped Zelenskyy and Ukraine on two separate occasions this week. Speaking Wednesday in North Carolina, he referred to Ukraine as “demolished” and its people as “dead.”

“Any deal — the worst deal — would’ve been better than what we have now,” Trump said. “If they made a bad deal, it would’ve been much better. They would’ve given up a little bit and everybody would be living and every building would be built and every tower would be aging for another 2,000 years.”

Meanwhile, Harris on Thursday stood alongside Zelenskyy and said Trump's push for Ukraine to quickly cut a deal to end the war was “not proposals for peace,” but “proposals for surrender.” Trump on Thursday said he was not advocating for a surrender.

As he was preparing to sit down for the Friday meeting, Trump was asked by a reporter if Ukraine could win the war and he replied, “Sure. They could.”

He said of Zelenskyy: "We have a very good relationship. And I also have a very good relationship, as you know, with President Putin. And if we win, I think we’re going to get it resolved very quickly.”

Zelenskyy cut into Trump's remarks with, “I hope we have more good relations between us." Before moving on to another question, Trump interjected to say “but, you know, it takes two to tango.”



Iran Treads Carefully, Backing Hezbollah While Avoiding War

Analysts say Iran's strategy is to project power without being dragged into a war and playing into Israel's hands. ATTA KENARE / AFP/File
Analysts say Iran's strategy is to project power without being dragged into a war and playing into Israel's hands. ATTA KENARE / AFP/File
TT

Iran Treads Carefully, Backing Hezbollah While Avoiding War

Analysts say Iran's strategy is to project power without being dragged into a war and playing into Israel's hands. ATTA KENARE / AFP/File
Analysts say Iran's strategy is to project power without being dragged into a war and playing into Israel's hands. ATTA KENARE / AFP/File

As violence between Israel and Hezbollah escalates, Iran is walking a tightrope by supporting Hezbollah without being dragged into a full-blown conflict and playing into its enemy's hands.
With a focus on easing its isolation and reviving its battered economy, Iran is aware that war could complicate efforts to secure relief from crippling sanctions, AFP said.
Cross-border fire between Israel and Hezbollah, sparked by Hamas's October 7 attack on Israel, has intensified, especially after last week's sabotage on Hezbollah's communications that killed 39 people.
Israeli air strikes on Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon followed, killing hundreds. Hezbollah retaliated with rocket barrages.
Despite the surge in hostilities, Iran appears determined to avoid direct military confrontation.
"Iran is not going to be pulled into war," said Hamid Gholamzadeh, an Iran-based political expert.
Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group said Iran's strategy was to project power, without directly engaging, especially as escalation could benefit Israel and impact the US election.
"Iran does not want to play into its arch-enemy's hands," said Vaez, noting Iran's priority was securing sanctions relief and some economic stability.
Even during its first-ever direct attack on Israel in April -- retaliation for an air strike Tehran's embassy annex in Damascus -- most missiles were intercepted by Israel's defenses or allied forces.
Measured approach
In New York, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian accused Israel of warmongering while positioning Iran as restrained.
He suggested Iran had held back retaliation after the killing of Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran in July, fearing it could derail US efforts for a Gaza ceasefire.
"We tried to not respond. They kept telling us we were within reach of peace, perhaps in a week or so," he said.
"But we never reached that elusive peace. Every day Israel is committing more atrocities."
This measured approach echoes Iran's response earlier this year during heightened tensions with Israel. Iran fired hundreds of missiles and drones after the Damascus strike, but most were intercepted.
Analysts say Iran is flexing its muscles amid the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, without provoking a US response.
Iran continues to face Western sanctions, especially since the United States, under then-president Donald Trump, withdrew from a nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers in 2018.
European nations have also slapped sanctions on Iran, accusing it of supplying ballistic missiles to Russia for the Ukraine war.
Iran denied the accusations, with Pezeshkian saying in New York that Iran was "willing to sit down with the Europeans and the Americans to have a dialogue and negotiations".
Vaez said any Iranian escalation could strengthen Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and even possibly help Trump return to power.
This "would be highly detrimental for Iranian interests", he said.
'Dangerous consequences'
Despite its restraint, Iran continues to back Hezbollah. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned Tehran would "not remain indifferent" to Israeli attacks.
Iran also urged the UN Security Council to take immediate action, warning of "dangerous consequences" for Israel.
Israel has targeted senior Hezbollah commanders since the Gaza war began.
Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei this week lamented the loss of Hezbollah's fighters but said it would not bring the group "to its knees".
Afifeh Abedi, a political researcher, said Iran was evaluating its support for Hezbollah, but noted the group's "significant human resources".
Gholamzadeh added that Hezbollah's resources ensure it will not be easily defeated.
"Hezbollah needs to be supported, but this support does not mean that they might be defeated if there is no support," he said.
Vaez said last week's attack on Hezbollah's communications may have weakened the group, but it would not be completely "paralyzed even if the first two tiers of its leadership were... eliminated".
This vulnerability, he said, could be one of the reasons for Iran and Hezbollah's "reluctance to enter a full-fledged war".