Netanyahu is Intensifying His War Against His Army

Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)
Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)
TT
20

Netanyahu is Intensifying His War Against His Army

Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)
Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)

Israel has recently witnessed a new and intense escalation at the so-called eighth front that has emerged between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government against the leadership of the Israeli army and other security services.
The dispute between the two sides has reached a stage where the PM has requested the dismissal of the military's chief spokesman, Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari.
Hagari, known for his wartime propaganda and cold-bloodedness, is a beloved figure in Israel.
The vast majority of Israeli Jews, 87%, have confidence in the Army spokesperson, according to a poll conducted by the Israel Democracy Institute. This trust later dropped to 67% and again rose to 76%.
But the Israeli government wants to fire Hagari after the latter dared to criticize last Wednesday the so-called Feldstein law being advanced by the government. The law would shield members of the defense establishment from prosecution should they give classified intelligence to the prime minister or defense minister without authorization.
When asked about the law, Hagari said the legal amendment considered by lawmakers was “dangerous for the army and the country's security.”
During a press briefing, the spokesperson said the law aims to protect Eli Feldstein, a spokesman for Netanyahu, and an unnamed army reservist relating to their alleged involvement in the leak of stolen classified intelligence information to the foreign press.
“The army does not hide information from the political echelon. The army works in accordance with the political echelon for the defense of Israel,” Hagari said in response to a question at a press conference.
He said, “The document in question was accessible to the relevant authorities in the Prime Minister’s Office,” referring to the leaked classified intel.
“This law is very dangerous because it will create a situation where any junior official in the army can, based on his own personal judgment, steal documents or intelligence materials from the army,” he continued.
Angry Government
Hagari’s statements were met with criticism from government officials, including Defense Minister Israel Katz.
“The criticism by the army spokesman against the political echelon and against the legislative process in the Knesset is a grave incident and a complete deviation from his authority and what is allowed and expected of a uniformed person in a democratic regime,” Katz said.
Katz threatened that he would take “disciplinary action” against Hagari for his comments “as soon as possible.”
Hagari was also criticized by the government and several deputies, who said he had “exceeded the scope of his authority” by criticizing the law.
In a statement, Netanyahu said, “It is good that the army spokesman was put in his place to ensure that such a statement is not heard again.”
He added, “In a democratic country, the military is not supposed to interfere in political matters and certainly not criticize legislation.”
Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana said that in a democratic country, the military does not criticize the legislative process in parliament at a press conference.
“The army can express its position in the Knesset committee that prepares the law, as it has done countless times in the past, and as all state bodies that are monitored by the Knesset or are affected by legislation do,” Ohana said.
National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir linked Hagari’s criticism to Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara’s initiation of investigations of police officials who carried out orders by Ben Gvir to distribute weapons in contradiction to existing regulations.
“The spirit of the attorney general is seeping into the army spokesperson,” Ben Gvir said. “When Hagari sees that the attorney general disregards the government, he also disregards the defense minister. Full deep state – except this time, it's already from the get-go.”
Interior Minister Moshe Arbel said Hagari’s statement was a very serious crossing of a red line.
“No one in uniform has any right to publicly express a political opinion on political issues, whatever their position may be, especially when it contradicts the position of the relevant minister,” Arbel said.
For his part, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said, “Israel has an army, not the other way around.”
In response to the criticisms, the Israeli army issued a statement, saying “Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi reprimanded the army spokesperson for his response to a question about the law on transferring classified information to the Prime Minister and ministers during a press briefing, in which he exceeded his authority.”
The statement added that the army “does not criticize the legislature but conveys its position to the political leadership through the appropriate mechanisms for that purpose.”
Later, Hagari issued a personal statement apologizing for his remarks.
“In my statement tonight in response to a question, I spoke in a way that exceeded my authority as the army spokesperson, and for this, I was reprimanded by the Chief of Staff. Israel is a democratic country, and the army is subordinate to the political leadership.”
He added, “In the hundreds of statements and questions I have answered since October 7, I have maintained professionalism.”
On Wednesday, the Knesset had approved the so-called Feldstein bill in a preliminary reading.
The proposed legislation was introduced by Knesset members Hanoch Milwidsky and Amit Halevi, both from Netanyahu's Likud Party.
It passed with 59 out of 120 votes in favor and 52 against.
The bill follows the “classified documents case,” which emerged months ago, implicating Eli Feldstein, Netanyahu's security spokesperson, and advisor Jonatan Urich in the alleged leak of military intelligence documents.

 



Russia Says It Cannot Accept US Proposals on Ukraine ‘In Current Form’

 A view shows ruins of buildings in the abandoned town of Marinka (Maryinka), which was destroyed in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict in the Donetsk region, a Russian-controlled area of Ukraine, April 1, 2025. (Reuters)
A view shows ruins of buildings in the abandoned town of Marinka (Maryinka), which was destroyed in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict in the Donetsk region, a Russian-controlled area of Ukraine, April 1, 2025. (Reuters)
TT
20

Russia Says It Cannot Accept US Proposals on Ukraine ‘In Current Form’

 A view shows ruins of buildings in the abandoned town of Marinka (Maryinka), which was destroyed in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict in the Donetsk region, a Russian-controlled area of Ukraine, April 1, 2025. (Reuters)
A view shows ruins of buildings in the abandoned town of Marinka (Maryinka), which was destroyed in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict in the Donetsk region, a Russian-controlled area of Ukraine, April 1, 2025. (Reuters)

Russia cannot accept US proposals to end the war in Ukraine in their current form because they do not address problems Moscow regards as having caused the conflict, a senior Russian diplomat said, suggesting US-Russia talks on the subject had stalled.

The comments by Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov suggest Moscow and Washington have so far been unable to bridge differences which President Vladimir Putin raised more than two weeks ago when he said US proposals needed reworking.

They come as US President Donald Trump appears to be growing increasingly impatient with what he has suggested might be foot-dragging over a wider deal by Moscow.

Trump in recent days has said he is "pissed off" with Putin and has spoken of imposing sanctions on countries that buy Russian oil if he feels Moscow is blocking a deal.

Ryabkov, a specialist in US-Russia relations, said Moscow was not yet able to move forward with a deal however.

"We take the models and solutions proposed by the Americans very seriously, but we can't accept it all in its current form," Ryabkov was quoted by state media as telling the Russian magazine "International Affairs" in an interview released on Tuesday.

"As far as we can see, there is no place in them today for our main demand, namely to solve the problems related to the root causes of this conflict. It is completely absent, and that must be overcome."

Putin has said he wants Ukraine to drop its ambitions to join NATO, Russia to control the entirety of four Ukrainian regions it has claimed as its own, and the size of the Ukrainian army to be limited. Kyiv says those demands are tantamount to demanding its capitulation.

'VERY COMPLEX'

Asked about Trump's latest remarks about wanting Putin to do a deal on Ukraine, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters earlier on Tuesday that Moscow was "continuing our contacts with the American side".

"The subject is very complex. The substance that we are discussing, related to the Ukrainian settlement, is very complex. This requires a lot of extra effort."

Russia also said on Tuesday it was fully complying with a US-brokered moratorium on attacking Ukraine's energy facilities.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told state TV that Defense Minister Andrei Belousov had briefed Putin on alleged Ukrainian violations during a meeting of Russia's Security Council on Tuesday. Russia passed a list of the violations to US National Security Adviser Mike Waltz and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Lavrov said.

Before the weekend, Trump had taken a more conciliatory stance towards Russia that has unnerved the United States' European allies as he tries to broker an end to the conflict in Ukraine, now in its fourth year.

But in recent days, and amid lobbying by Europeans such as Finland's president urging him to hold Russia to account, he has adopted a tougher tone.