Netanyahu is Intensifying His War Against His Army

Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)
Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)
TT

Netanyahu is Intensifying His War Against His Army

Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)
Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)

Israel has recently witnessed a new and intense escalation at the so-called eighth front that has emerged between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government against the leadership of the Israeli army and other security services.
The dispute between the two sides has reached a stage where the PM has requested the dismissal of the military's chief spokesman, Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari.
Hagari, known for his wartime propaganda and cold-bloodedness, is a beloved figure in Israel.
The vast majority of Israeli Jews, 87%, have confidence in the Army spokesperson, according to a poll conducted by the Israel Democracy Institute. This trust later dropped to 67% and again rose to 76%.
But the Israeli government wants to fire Hagari after the latter dared to criticize last Wednesday the so-called Feldstein law being advanced by the government. The law would shield members of the defense establishment from prosecution should they give classified intelligence to the prime minister or defense minister without authorization.
When asked about the law, Hagari said the legal amendment considered by lawmakers was “dangerous for the army and the country's security.”
During a press briefing, the spokesperson said the law aims to protect Eli Feldstein, a spokesman for Netanyahu, and an unnamed army reservist relating to their alleged involvement in the leak of stolen classified intelligence information to the foreign press.
“The army does not hide information from the political echelon. The army works in accordance with the political echelon for the defense of Israel,” Hagari said in response to a question at a press conference.
He said, “The document in question was accessible to the relevant authorities in the Prime Minister’s Office,” referring to the leaked classified intel.
“This law is very dangerous because it will create a situation where any junior official in the army can, based on his own personal judgment, steal documents or intelligence materials from the army,” he continued.
Angry Government
Hagari’s statements were met with criticism from government officials, including Defense Minister Israel Katz.
“The criticism by the army spokesman against the political echelon and against the legislative process in the Knesset is a grave incident and a complete deviation from his authority and what is allowed and expected of a uniformed person in a democratic regime,” Katz said.
Katz threatened that he would take “disciplinary action” against Hagari for his comments “as soon as possible.”
Hagari was also criticized by the government and several deputies, who said he had “exceeded the scope of his authority” by criticizing the law.
In a statement, Netanyahu said, “It is good that the army spokesman was put in his place to ensure that such a statement is not heard again.”
He added, “In a democratic country, the military is not supposed to interfere in political matters and certainly not criticize legislation.”
Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana said that in a democratic country, the military does not criticize the legislative process in parliament at a press conference.
“The army can express its position in the Knesset committee that prepares the law, as it has done countless times in the past, and as all state bodies that are monitored by the Knesset or are affected by legislation do,” Ohana said.
National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir linked Hagari’s criticism to Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara’s initiation of investigations of police officials who carried out orders by Ben Gvir to distribute weapons in contradiction to existing regulations.
“The spirit of the attorney general is seeping into the army spokesperson,” Ben Gvir said. “When Hagari sees that the attorney general disregards the government, he also disregards the defense minister. Full deep state – except this time, it's already from the get-go.”
Interior Minister Moshe Arbel said Hagari’s statement was a very serious crossing of a red line.
“No one in uniform has any right to publicly express a political opinion on political issues, whatever their position may be, especially when it contradicts the position of the relevant minister,” Arbel said.
For his part, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said, “Israel has an army, not the other way around.”
In response to the criticisms, the Israeli army issued a statement, saying “Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi reprimanded the army spokesperson for his response to a question about the law on transferring classified information to the Prime Minister and ministers during a press briefing, in which he exceeded his authority.”
The statement added that the army “does not criticize the legislature but conveys its position to the political leadership through the appropriate mechanisms for that purpose.”
Later, Hagari issued a personal statement apologizing for his remarks.
“In my statement tonight in response to a question, I spoke in a way that exceeded my authority as the army spokesperson, and for this, I was reprimanded by the Chief of Staff. Israel is a democratic country, and the army is subordinate to the political leadership.”
He added, “In the hundreds of statements and questions I have answered since October 7, I have maintained professionalism.”
On Wednesday, the Knesset had approved the so-called Feldstein bill in a preliminary reading.
The proposed legislation was introduced by Knesset members Hanoch Milwidsky and Amit Halevi, both from Netanyahu's Likud Party.
It passed with 59 out of 120 votes in favor and 52 against.
The bill follows the “classified documents case,” which emerged months ago, implicating Eli Feldstein, Netanyahu's security spokesperson, and advisor Jonatan Urich in the alleged leak of military intelligence documents.

 



Massive Fire Destroys Resort in Dominican Republic and Forces Evacuation of Almost 1,700 Tourists

A drone view shows a fire at the Viva Wyndham Dominicus Beach Hotel in Bayahibe, La Altagracia, Dominican Republic, June 19, 2026 in this screen grab obtained from social media video. Gojko Culibrk/via REUTERS
A drone view shows a fire at the Viva Wyndham Dominicus Beach Hotel in Bayahibe, La Altagracia, Dominican Republic, June 19, 2026 in this screen grab obtained from social media video. Gojko Culibrk/via REUTERS
TT

Massive Fire Destroys Resort in Dominican Republic and Forces Evacuation of Almost 1,700 Tourists

A drone view shows a fire at the Viva Wyndham Dominicus Beach Hotel in Bayahibe, La Altagracia, Dominican Republic, June 19, 2026 in this screen grab obtained from social media video. Gojko Culibrk/via REUTERS
A drone view shows a fire at the Viva Wyndham Dominicus Beach Hotel in Bayahibe, La Altagracia, Dominican Republic, June 19, 2026 in this screen grab obtained from social media video. Gojko Culibrk/via REUTERS

A large fire almost completely destroyed a luxury resort in the Dominican Republic on Friday, forcing the evacuation of almost 1,700 tourists, authorities said.

Local media reported an Italian tourist died in the fire and several other tourists required medical assistance.

The Viva Dominicus Beach by Wyndham resort is located in Bayahibe, a popular destination for US and international tourists on the Dominican Republic's southeastern coast.

Authorities reported about 1,690 tourists had to be evacuated from the resort to other hotels and nearby housing facilities because of the massive blaze.

The cause of the blaze was under investigation and the country’s Emergency Operations Center said it appeared the “fire spread rapidly” due to wind and because part of the resort’s roof was made of thatch, The Associated Press reported.

Viva Wyndham’s other nearby resort, the Dominicus Palace, was not damaged by the fire and was operating as normal, the center said.


France’s Macron Slams Migrant ‘Return-Hubs’, EU Funding Push

French President Emmanuel Macron addresses a press conference during a European Council summit in Brussels, Belgium, 19 June 2026. (EPA)
French President Emmanuel Macron addresses a press conference during a European Council summit in Brussels, Belgium, 19 June 2026. (EPA)
TT

France’s Macron Slams Migrant ‘Return-Hubs’, EU Funding Push

French President Emmanuel Macron addresses a press conference during a European Council summit in Brussels, Belgium, 19 June 2026. (EPA)
French President Emmanuel Macron addresses a press conference during a European Council summit in Brussels, Belgium, 19 June 2026. (EPA)

French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday slammed the idea of creating deportation centers for irregular migrants outside the EU, saying Paris will oppose efforts to have the bloc fund them.

So-called "return hubs" outside the EU's borders are one of the main features of a tightening of migration rules criticized by human rights groups that won the final approval of the European Parliament this week.

"France does not support that policy," Macron told journalists after a summit of European leaders in Brussels, noting the new rules allowed for people to be sent to countries they had no ties to -- which could receive money in turn.

"I'm not sure that's the Europe we want. I'm not sure those are the fundamental principles on which our Europe was built. And I don't believe, for that matter, that it's effective. The proof is that, so far, I haven't seen anyone make it work."

France was in favor of stricter rules to boost returns of people with no right to stay to their country of origin, but would not be building return hubs, he added.

"I don't believe that this is either effective or in line with our principles," Macron said.

While other EU members were free to go ahead with such plans, Paris was against a move supported by many other member states to have EU money help pay for them, Macron said.

Proponents say return hubs -- which would serve either as the final destination or as transfer centers for those expelled -- could facilitate repatriations and act as a deterrent for would-be irregular migrants

But rights groups have criticized them as "legal black holes" that could see migrants stranded in limbo with little oversight.

Britain abandoned a scheme to deport undocumented migrants to Rwanda, while Italian-run facilities to process migrants in Albania have faced legal challenges and a slow uptake.


EU Leaders Squabble Over Outreach to Moscow as Ukraine War Rages on

European Council President Antonio Costa speaks during a press conference at the end of European Council summit in Brussels, Belgium, 19 June 2026. (EPA)
European Council President Antonio Costa speaks during a press conference at the end of European Council summit in Brussels, Belgium, 19 June 2026. (EPA)
TT

EU Leaders Squabble Over Outreach to Moscow as Ukraine War Rages on

European Council President Antonio Costa speaks during a press conference at the end of European Council summit in Brussels, Belgium, 19 June 2026. (EPA)
European Council President Antonio Costa speaks during a press conference at the end of European Council summit in Brussels, Belgium, 19 June 2026. (EPA)

European Union leaders have been unable to agree on setting up a back-channel with Moscow to ensure that the bloc’s interests are protected should progress be made in negotiations to end Russia’s war on Ukraine, some of them said on Friday.

European Council President Antonio Costa, who chaired their two-day summit, had directed his office to reach out to the Kremlin and proposed a senior official to make contact. Costa said his aim was not to mediate or set up a parallel negotiating track to the one led by the United States, which is making little progress.

Debate has been swirling around Europe in recent months about whether to appoint a mediator for talks with Russia to help get things moving again, but this has been largely rejected as many believe that Russian President Vladimir Putin would be unlikely to negotiate anyway.

Instead, the 27 EU countries have focused on concessions that Russia should make to secure peace.

Speaking to reporters, Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš said the leaders had failed to resolve their differences over the approach overnight. “Europe is unable to agree even on whether there will be negotiations or who will lead them,” he said.

Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin said that “opening up a channel is not a mistake in our view, and I trust António Costa.”

“What was very clear last evening is that any negotiations would have to be first and foremost between Ukraine and Russia, but there are no indications that Russia is coming to the table at all,” he said.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz stressed that peace negotiations must ultimately be conducted by Ukraine, Russia, Europe and the US.

“Who speaks for the European Union is something we don’t need to decide on today,” he said. “We will decide on that when talks come about.”

He added that Costa has “an important to role to play” as president of the European Council, representing the EU, preparing and organizing summits, and “we don’t need to make decisions going beyond that at the moment.”

Merz highlighted efforts to coordinate diplomacy by the so-called E3 group of countries — Germany, France and Britain — a format that he said came about “at the explicit wish of Ukraine.”

Putin has tried to cut out Europe and Kyiv from negotiations with the US over Ukraine’s future. But the Kremlin said on Friday it was “ready for contact” with Europe, on the condition it abandon its desire to talk to Moscow from the position of force.

At the same time, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov argued that the EU can not be an impartial peace broker. He again rejected Western claims that Moscow was harboring plants to attack Europe as “provocation” and “nonsense” while warning that Europe’s military buildup poses growing security threats.

“A direct confrontation between NATO and Russia could rapidly escalate into an exchange of nuclear strikes, with catastrophic consequences,” Lavrov said in an essay released by the Russian Foreign Ministry.

As the leaders left their meeting overnight, Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever joked that Costa would be the envoy to Moscow.

“I was just talking about you, António,” De Wever said while laughing and shaking Costa’s hand. “I was full of praise, saying you are the only one who can represent us and that we will send you to Moscow.”

Margus Tsahkna, foreign minister of Estonia — a nation on the EU’s eastern flank that has faced drone incursions and was once occupied by the Soviet Union — said that “Europe must not assume the role of a neutral mediator” and instead buttress Ukraine’s position to “force the Kremlin into serious negotiations.”