Iran Urges IAEA to Avoid Politicizing its Nuclear Program

Iran's Vice-President for Strategic Affairs Javad Zarif speaks during the 55th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 22, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman
Iran's Vice-President for Strategic Affairs Javad Zarif speaks during the 55th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 22, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman
TT
20

Iran Urges IAEA to Avoid Politicizing its Nuclear Program

Iran's Vice-President for Strategic Affairs Javad Zarif speaks during the 55th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 22, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman
Iran's Vice-President for Strategic Affairs Javad Zarif speaks during the 55th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 22, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman

Iran has called on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to maintain its technical cooperation with the country and refrain from politicizing technical issues.

The Iranian request came shortly after Iranian Vice President for Strategic Affairs Javad Zarif said Washington's flexibility would leave room for negotiations.

“Iran and the IAEA must continue their cooperation in a technical and forward-looking environment,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Thursday during a telephone conversation with the agency’s chief, Rafael Grossi.

The Foreign Minister urged the IAEA to act within the framework of its responsibilities and continue cooperation with Iran in “a technical atmosphere,” away from “unjustified pressure” exerted by some countries.

The semi-official Mehr news agency said Araghchi reiterated his country’s determination to continue cooperation with the IAEA within the framework of its international obligations, stressing the agency needs to avoid politicization.

Iran earlier said Israel and the US would be “crazy” to attack its nuclear facilities, adding it would spell a “very bad disaster” for the region. Tehran also said that the new US administration should work to win back Iran’s trust if it wants a new round of nuclear negotiations.

Last week, US President Donald Trump said he wished to avoid military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, hoping instead for an agreement.

On Wednesday, Iranian newspaper Jomhouri-e Eslami, which is close to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said the statements of regime officials signal that the willingness of Iran to negotiate has become greater than ever.

It added that in such case, there is hope for a breakthrough in foreign policy issues.

For his part, Javad Zarif criticized the US influence on his country's foreign policy, calling it an obstacle that must be removed.

Speaking at a conference in Tehran, titled Prospects of Regional and Global Developments in the Trump Era, Zarif said: “I do not view the United States as an opportunity for Iran's foreign policy; I see it as an obstacle.”

According to Mehr, he said Trump's focus on reviving hard power through economic pressure—such as tariffs and visa restrictions—was emblematic of his administration's approach to global dominance.

The Iranian Vice President added that Trump divided countries into “smaller nations that must show loyalty and other peer nations that do not.”

This dynamic, he suggested, “weakened the notion of stable alliances, replacing them with temporary, issue-based coalitions.”

Zarif also addressed perceptions of Iran’s weakened state, refuting that it posed a greater nuclear threat.

“They argue that military action is the only way to stop Iran,” he said, but added that Trump’s flexibility might leave room for negotiations.

After Trump's victory in the US presidential election, sources close to him said his administration will return to the ‘maximum pressure’ measures against Tehran. They also spoke about a possible military attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.



Australia Says Will Not Commit Troops in Advance to Any Conflict

Residential properties are seen near the Sydney Harbour Bridge in, Sydney, Australia, July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams
Residential properties are seen near the Sydney Harbour Bridge in, Sydney, Australia, July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams
TT
20

Australia Says Will Not Commit Troops in Advance to Any Conflict

Residential properties are seen near the Sydney Harbour Bridge in, Sydney, Australia, July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams
Residential properties are seen near the Sydney Harbour Bridge in, Sydney, Australia, July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams

Australia will not commit troops in advance to any conflict, Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy said on Sunday, responding to a report that the Pentagon has pressed its ally to clarify what role it would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan.

Australia prioritizes its sovereignty and "we don't discuss hypotheticals", Conroy said in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

"The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance but by the government of the day," he said.

The Financial Times reported on Saturday that Elbridge Colby, the US under-secretary of defense for policy, has been pressing Australian and Japanese officials on what they would do in a Taiwan conflict, although the US does not offer a blank cheque guarantee to defend Taiwan.

Colby posted on X that the Department of Defense is implementing President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda of restoring deterrence, which includes "urging allies to step up their defense spending and other efforts related to our collective defense".

China claims democratically governed Taiwan as its own and has not ruled out the use of force to bring Taiwan under its control. Taiwan President Lai Ching-te rejects China's sovereignty claims, saying only Taiwan's people can decide their future.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, speaking in Shanghai at the start of a six-day visit to China that is likely to focus on security and trade, said Canberra did not want any change to the status quo on Taiwan.

Conroy said Australia was concerned about China's military buildup of nuclear and conventional forces, and wants a balanced Indo-Pacific region where no country dominates. He said China was seeking a military base in the Pacific, which was not in Australia's interest, Reuters reported.

'GOAL IS NO WAR'

Talisman Sabre, Australia's largest war-fighting exercise with the United States, opened on Sunday on Sydney Harbour and will involve 40,000 troops from 19 countries, including Japan, South Korea, India, Britain, France and Canada.

Conroy said China's navy might be watching the exercise to collect information, as it had done in the past.

The war games will span thousands of kilometers from Australia's Indian Ocean territory of Christmas Island to the Coral Sea on Australia's east coast, in a rehearsal of joint war fighting, said Vice Admiral Justin Jones, chief of joint operations for the Australian Defense Force.

The air, sea, land and space exercises over two weeks will "test our ability to move our forces into the north of Australia and operate from Australia", Jones told reporters.

"I will leave it to China to interpret what 19 friends, allies and partners wanting to operate together in the region means to them. But for me... it is nations that are in search of a common aspiration for peace, stability, a free and open Indo-Pacific," he said.

US Army Lieutenant General Joel Vowell, deputy commanding general for the Pacific, said Talisman Sabre would improve the readiness of militaries to respond together and was "a deterrent mechanism because our ultimate goal is no war".

"If we could do all this alone and we could go fast, but because we want to go far, we have to do it together and that is important because of the instability that is resident in the region," Vowell said.

The United States is Australia's major security ally. Although Australia does not permit foreign bases, the US military is expanding its rotational presence and fuel stores on Australian bases, which from 2027 will have US Virginia submarines at port in Western Australia.