Grossi: Nuclear Deal is ‘Empty Shell,’ We Need New Format

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director Rafael Grossi attends a press conference at the Japan National Press Club in Tokyo, Japan, 20 February 2025. EPA/FRANCK ROBICHON
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director Rafael Grossi attends a press conference at the Japan National Press Club in Tokyo, Japan, 20 February 2025. EPA/FRANCK ROBICHON
TT
20

Grossi: Nuclear Deal is ‘Empty Shell,’ We Need New Format

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director Rafael Grossi attends a press conference at the Japan National Press Club in Tokyo, Japan, 20 February 2025. EPA/FRANCK ROBICHON
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director Rafael Grossi attends a press conference at the Japan National Press Club in Tokyo, Japan, 20 February 2025. EPA/FRANCK ROBICHON

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi called Thursday for a new framework for negotiations with Iran over its almost weapon level nuclear program, describing the 2015 deal as an “empty shell.”

At a press conference in Tokyo, Grossi said the text of the previous JCPOA agreement already contains outdated information, including the types of centrifuges used by Iran, according to the Russian news agency, TASS.

“It is necessary to look for a new format for a deal with Iran,” Grossi said.

“The JCPOA is an empty shell. I don't think anybody thinks that the JCPOA can play a role at the moment. I think it used to be an agreement that was in operation for some time, but now, irrespective of what you may think about its merits or lack of thereof, it is obvious that technologically speaking, it has been completely superseded. It is no longer fit for purpose,” he added.

Grossi noted that during his meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, the two sides agreed that “the philosophy of the JCPOA,” which is based on Iran's “restraint of activities in exchange for incentives,” can continue.

The nuclear deal -- known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action -- collapsed following Washington’s withdrawal from it in 2018 during the first term of US President Donald Trump, who returned to office in January.

Last week, Grossi warned that Iran was in the process of increasing around sevenfold its monthly production of uranium enriched to up to 60%.

He said Iran would likely have about 250 kg of uranium enriched to up to 60% by the time of the agency's next report in the coming weeks.

That is enough in principle, if enriched further, for six nuclear bombs, according to an IAEA yardstick.

“I think we are running out of time, but it doesn't mean that we can't do it fast,” Grossi said in an interview on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference.

“The IAEA is there and has all the information and elements, but when it comes to the policy it's up to the countries,” he added.

Also last Sunday, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to “finish the job” against Iran with the support of Washington.

Earlier this month, intelligence reports warned that Israel is likely to launch a preemptive attack on Iran's nuclear program by midyear.

Analysts say Iran is forced to negotiate with Trump, with the downfall of its key ally, the Assad regime in Syria, and the severe weakening of Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

In an interview with Fox News, Trump said Iran's military vulnerabilities appeared to have left it in a weakened position, making negotiations more appealing than confrontation.

Trump predicted that Washington would make a deal with Iran to prevent it from developing its nuclear program, but added that Tehran is very frightened because its defenses have been allegedly destroyed in an Israeli strike last year.

Meanwhile, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tehran has repeatedly announced that it seeks dialogue but will never succumb to force and pressure and hold negotiations “at any cost.”

“It is not acceptable to impose sanctions and say that you should have no missiles or weapons, and then talk about negotiations again,” Pezeshkian said in a meeting with elites and intellectuals of Tehran Province on Thursday.



Qalibaf: Any Aggression Against Iran Would Cause Regional Explosion

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf (Iranian Parliament)
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf (Iranian Parliament)
TT
20

Qalibaf: Any Aggression Against Iran Would Cause Regional Explosion

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf (Iranian Parliament)
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf (Iranian Parliament)

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf warned on Tuesday that any Israeli attack against his country “means igniting a powder keg that will explode the entire region.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday repeated calls for Iran's entire nuclear infrastructure to be dismantled, as Washington and Tehran engage in talks for a nuclear accord.

Netanyahu said that he had told US President Donald Trump that any nuclear agreement reached with Iran should also prevent Tehran from developing ballistic missiles.

Speaking at an open parliamentary session in Tehran, Qalibaf said, “We consider these positions to be merely worthless rhetoric to influence the process of Iran-US indirect negotiations, and we do not take it (the rhetoric) seriously.”

However, he added, the Zionist regime will not engage in any act of adventurism or foolishness without the permission of the United States.

On Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Netanyahu was “dictating what President Trump can and cannot do in his diplomacy with Iran.”

“Israel’s fantasy that it can dictate what Iran may or may not do is so detached from reality that it hardly merits a response,” Araghchi said.

His remarks came two days after Iranian and US delegations met in Oman for a third round of high-level talks on Tehran’s nuclear program, with both sides reporting progress.

Netanyahu said the only “good deal” between the US and Iran would be one that removed “all of the infrastructure” akin to the 2003 agreement that Libya made with the West that saw it give up its nuclear, chemical, biological and missile programs.

Meanwhile, France said it will not think twice about reimposing United Nations sanctions on Iran if negotiations to reach a deal over its nuclear program do not succeed, its foreign minister told the UN Security Council late on Monday.

France, Britain and Germany - the “E3” - are parties to a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran that expires in October and have the power to initiate its mechanism for reimposing sanctions, called snapback, at the Security Council.

“It goes without saying that when the Iranian nuclear deal expires in a few weeks, if European security interests are not guaranteed, we will not hesitate for a single second to reapply all the sanctions that were lifted 10 years ago,” Jean-Noel Barrot said.

“These sanctions would then permanently close off Iranian access to technology, investment, and the European market, with devastating effects on the country's economy. This is not what we want, and that is why I solemnly call on Iran to take the necessary decisions today to avoid the worst,” Barrot added.

Speaking alongside Barrot, IAEA Director Rafael Grossi stressed that an agreement with Iran was crucial.

“There is a very important effort between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. I'm in constant contact with Ambassador Witkoff, of course, at the same time consulting with Foreign Minister Araghchi in order to provide the technical support and capabilities and monitoring potential that the IAEA should be able to exercise,” he said.

Later on X, Grossi wrote that “Iran’s expanding nuclear program remains a serious issue.”

He said, “To be noted are the intense diplomatic efforts and meetings between the US and Iran over the past few weeks; these are important. I am engaging closely and actively with both sides and am encouraged by their commitment.”