Trump Officials Violated Court Order over South Sudan Deportation Attempt, Judge Says

Anwen Hughes, an attorney with Human Rights First and Trina Realmuto, Executive Director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, speak with reporters outside the federal courthouse, after a judge ruled that the Trump administration violated his court order by attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan, in Boston, Massachusetts, US, May 21, 2025. REUTERS/Nate Raymond
Anwen Hughes, an attorney with Human Rights First and Trina Realmuto, Executive Director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, speak with reporters outside the federal courthouse, after a judge ruled that the Trump administration violated his court order by attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan, in Boston, Massachusetts, US, May 21, 2025. REUTERS/Nate Raymond
TT

Trump Officials Violated Court Order over South Sudan Deportation Attempt, Judge Says

Anwen Hughes, an attorney with Human Rights First and Trina Realmuto, Executive Director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, speak with reporters outside the federal courthouse, after a judge ruled that the Trump administration violated his court order by attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan, in Boston, Massachusetts, US, May 21, 2025. REUTERS/Nate Raymond
Anwen Hughes, an attorney with Human Rights First and Trina Realmuto, Executive Director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, speak with reporters outside the federal courthouse, after a judge ruled that the Trump administration violated his court order by attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan, in Boston, Massachusetts, US, May 21, 2025. REUTERS/Nate Raymond

A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that the US government violated his court order by attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan, opening another front in a battle between Donald Trump and judges who have imposed checks on the Republican president's hardline immigration policies.

US District Judge Brian Murphy said US officials risked being held in contempt of court for violating a preliminary injunction he issued in April to block the administration from sending deportees to countries other than their own without the opportunity to raise any concerns they had for their safety.

At a hearing in Boston, the judge said the US Department of Homeland Security failed to provide six migrants covered by his injunction a meaningful opportunity to contest being sent to South Sudan when it notified them of that possibility less than 24 hours before they were loaded onto a plane.

That was "plainly insufficient" notice, according to the judge. He later issued an order making clear that non-citizens must be given at least 10 days to raise a claim that they fear for their safety before they are deported to a country other than their own.

"The department's actions in this case are unquestionably violative of this court's order," Murphy said.

Murphy, who was appointed by Trump's Democratic predecessor President Joe Biden, warned of the possibility of holding officials in criminal contempt, but did not immediately punish anyone.

The White House in a statement called Murphy "a far-left activist judge," while a spokesperson for the Homeland Security Department called his ruling "deranged."

The department said eight men from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan had been deported, and they had been convicted of murder, armed robbery and other serious crimes. Six of them were covered by Murphy's order, the judge said.

"These are the monsters that the district judge is trying to protect," Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told reporters at a press conference ahead of Wednesday's hearing.

Immigration rights advocates have urged Murphy to order the men be returned to the US.

The judge instead directed officials to grant them interviews after at least 72 hours notice to assess if they have any reasonable fears of going to South Sudan and give them at least 15 days to seek to move to reopen their immigration proceedings if officials deem their claimed fears insufficient.

Murphy told lawyers that while it was his prerogative that the men be brought back to the United States during that process, the Homeland Security Department had the discretion to keep them overseas.

'SENT TO A WAR-TORN COUNTRY'

The judge's finding was one of the strongest rebukes so far to Trump's administration since the president returned to office in January. As a presidential candidate last year, Trump pledged to crack down on illegal immigration but many of his attempts to step up deportations have been impeded by the courts.

Justice Department lawyer Elainis Perez said at the hearing that Murphy's April preliminary injunction did not specifically state how much notice was required, and the expedited deportations did not violate rights protected under the US Constitution.

South Sudan has long been dangerous even for locals. The US State Department advises citizens not to travel there due to violent crime and armed conflict. The United Nations has said the African country's political crisis could reignite a brutal civil war that ended in 2018.

"They were being sent to a war-torn country where their very life and safety is under threat," Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the migrants at the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, told reporters.

The dispute echoes another case in which Washington-based US District Judge James Boasberg found that the administration violated his order to pause the deportations of Venezuelan migrants to a prison in El Salvador.

Boasberg also launched a criminal contempt investigation, but an appeals court has temporarily blocked it while the Trump administration challenges his probe. Trump has called for his impeachment, drawing a rebuke from Chief US Supreme Court Justice John Roberts.

In another case, Maryland-based US District Judge Paula Xinis said the administration did not adequately explain how it was complying with her order to facilitate the return of a Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported to El Salvador despite an earlier court order that he not be sent there.

Trump and US officials appointed by him have accused judges of overstepping their authority and of seeking to thwart his agenda.

The case before Murphy stems from a legal challenge brought by immigrant advocates to the administration's push to deport migrants with final orders of removal to countries other than their own, including migrants who have protections from being sent to their home countries due to safety concerns.

Murphy sided with the plaintiffs, ruling last month that any migrants being sent to a third country were entitled to due process under the US Constitution's Fifth Amendment and must have a meaningful opportunity to raise any fears for their safety.

In an emergency hearing on Tuesday after the advocates said they learned migrants were being flown to South Sudan, Murphy ordered the administration not to let the migrants leave the custody of US immigration authorities.

Throughout Wednesday's proceedings, the men were kept on a plane in a location that officials sought to avoid publicly disclosing in court.

Only after Murphy ruled did White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller appear in a social media post on X to confirm they were currently in Djibouti. He accused Murphy of "putting the lives of our personnel in danger."

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, South Sudan police spokesperson James Mande Enoka said that when the migrants arrived, they would be investigated and then "be again deported to the correct country."

Given those comments, Murphy ordered the Trump administration to submit a declaration explaining why the men's deportation would not violate a prohibition against them being shuttled back to their country of origin.



Iran FM Says Nuclear Deal ‘Within Reach’ Ahead of US Talks

 Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi addresses a special session of the Conference on Disarmament at the United Nations, aside of US-Iran talks in Geneva, Switzerland, February 17, 2026. (Reuters)
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi addresses a special session of the Conference on Disarmament at the United Nations, aside of US-Iran talks in Geneva, Switzerland, February 17, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Iran FM Says Nuclear Deal ‘Within Reach’ Ahead of US Talks

 Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi addresses a special session of the Conference on Disarmament at the United Nations, aside of US-Iran talks in Geneva, Switzerland, February 17, 2026. (Reuters)
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi addresses a special session of the Conference on Disarmament at the United Nations, aside of US-Iran talks in Geneva, Switzerland, February 17, 2026. (Reuters)

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Tuesday that a nuclear deal was "within reach", ahead of talks with the United States scheduled for later this week.

"We have a historic opportunity to strike an unprecedented agreement that addresses mutual concerns and achieves mutual interests," said Araghchi, in a post on the social media site X.

He added that a deal was "within reach, but only if diplomacy is given priority."

Tehran and Washington are due to hold a third round of nuclear negotiations on Thursday in Geneva, the latest since talks resumed earlier this month.

The talks will be held against the backdrop of heavy US military deployment in the region in recent weeks and threats by President Donald Trump of a strike if no deal was reached.

Iran has repeatedly said it would respond firmly to any attack and on Monday the foreign ministry that any strike, even limited, "would be regarded as an act of aggression".

In his post, Araghchi said Iran will "under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon" but insisted on its right to "harness dividends of peaceful nuclear technology."

"We have proven that we will stop at nothing to guard our sovereignty with courage," he added.

Iran and the US held five rounds of nuclear talks last year but those negotiations were brought to an end with Israel's unprecedented attack on Iran which triggered a 12-day war.

The US joined briefly with strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites.

Iran responded at the time with drone and missile attacks on Israel, as well as by targeting the largest US military base in the Middle East, which is in Qatar.

Iran has consistently denied any ambition to build a nuclear weapon but defends enriching uranium for civilian energy and research as a sovereign right.


Revolutionary Guards Conduct Military Drills in Iran’s South

Images of the drill carried out on Tuesday as shown on Iranian state television.
Images of the drill carried out on Tuesday as shown on Iranian state television.
TT

Revolutionary Guards Conduct Military Drills in Iran’s South

Images of the drill carried out on Tuesday as shown on Iranian state television.
Images of the drill carried out on Tuesday as shown on Iranian state television.

Iran's Revolutionary Guards, the ideological arm of the military, are carrying out drills on the country's southern shores of the Gulf, state media said Tuesday.

"Combined 1404 (2026) exercise of the IRGC Ground Forces has begun," state TV reported, referring to this year in both the Iranian and Gregorian calendars.

The war games are focused on the south coasts but similar drills are happening in other parts of Iran, the report added.

They include drones, vessels, amphibious vehicles, ground-to-sea missiles and rockets as well as artillery, state TV said.

"Very good measures have been designed in various sectors, including missiles, artillery, drones, special forces, armored vehicles and armored personnel carriers," Mohammad Karami, commander of IRGC ground forces, told state television.

He said the drills were being conducted "based on the threats that exist", without elaborating.

The drills come after Washington and Tehran concluded two rounds of Oman-mediated talks aimed at reaching a deal on Iran's nuclear program, with further talks set for Thursday.

Washington has repeatedly called for zero uranium enrichment by Iran but has also sought to address its ballistic missile program and support for militant groups in the region, demands Iran has rejected.

Western countries accuse Tehran of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.

Tehran denies having such military ambitions but insists on its right to nuclear technology for civilian purposes.

US President Donald Trump, who has ratcheted up pressure on Iran to reach an agreement, has deployed a significant naval force to the Middle East. He once again on Monday threatened Iran with a military attack if a deal is not reached.

Last week, Iranian naval forces conducted another round of military drills in the Gulf and around the strategic Strait of Hormuz.


Iran Issues Death Sentence Linked to January Unrest, Source Says

Iranians go shopping at the Tehran old grand bazaar in Tehran, Iran, 24 February 2026. (EPA)
Iranians go shopping at the Tehran old grand bazaar in Tehran, Iran, 24 February 2026. (EPA)
TT

Iran Issues Death Sentence Linked to January Unrest, Source Says

Iranians go shopping at the Tehran old grand bazaar in Tehran, Iran, 24 February 2026. (EPA)
Iranians go shopping at the Tehran old grand bazaar in Tehran, Iran, 24 February 2026. (EPA)

A revolutionary court in Tehran has issued a death sentence for an Iranian man accused of "enmity against God", which if confirmed would be the first such sentence linked to mass protests in January, a source close to the man's family said.

The ‌source told Reuters ‌on Tuesday that ‌Iran's ⁠judiciary had not yet ⁠announced the sentence against the man, Mohammad Abbasi, and that Iran's Supreme Court was yet to uphold it.

Abbasi was accused of killing a security officer, ⁠an allegation his family denied, the ‌source ‌said.

Rights groups say thousands of people were ‌killed in a crackdown on ‌the protests, the worst domestic unrest in Iran since the era of its 1979 revolution.

During the unrest, ‌US President Donald Trump warned Tehran that he could order ⁠military ⁠action if it carried out executions.

The source said the defendant's daughter, Fatemeh Abbasi, was handed a 25-year prison sentence over her role in protests.

"The defendants do not have access to the lawyer they wanted, and were given a public defender," the source added.